(SPOILER)
Entertainment Geekly's reviews "Smile Time"
"The triumphant return of Busty Nina and her little, felty friend." Also contains a speculation/spoiler for next week.
I never, ever seem to agree with this guy's reviews. I never fully agree with Herc either though.
February 19 2004
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


ZachsMind | February 19, 09:39 CET
Hell, if Joss can't get all of the actors back for a movie, just turn 'em into muppets! Man, I would kill for an all-muppet episode. Just dying here. Great ep indeed. I want to have Ben Edlund's evil genius babies. I've been laughing myself silly for hours since the episode aired.
[ edited by punkinpuss on 2004-02-19 09:15 ]
punkinpuss | February 19, 09:53 CET
EdDantes | February 19, 10:11 CET
Firefly Flanatic | February 19, 10:24 CET
And say does anyone remember Joss answering on-line questions a while ago and joking that if the budget ran out they would probably do it all with puppets? I wonder if that's where the idea came from.
EdDantes | February 19, 10:38 CET
The Gunn thing is potentially intriguing. Unfortunately, I've been saying that about the new direction with his character ever since his scene with Conduit-Cat in the White Room during "Home"--potentially intriguing. There'd better be some great pay-off, otherwise I'll feel pretty bad for J. August Richards. Every interview featuring him that I've read, he's seemed really excited about the new direction. Yeah, it must be great to have something to actually do after all this time (and he really proved that he could handle the spotlight last season in "Players" and man I just reminded myself that I kinda miss Gwen for the second time in the last week).
The Wes/Fred stuff really didn't bother me, I've always been sorta indifferent towards it (the only thing that really got me was Wes' anguish at the end of "Billy", but since then not much has really worked). Wes telling Angel to "get over it" though, that was the only thing that pissed me off about "Smile Time". What the fuck? He's suddenly a relationships counsellor? Who gives a shit if the majority of relationships (99.999%...???) don't provide perfect happiness, why would Wesley encourage Angel to risk all their lives for some tail? I also don't think Wes should go around doling out relationship advice, the only half-decent one he's had in the last five years was with Virginia. I don't think anyone'll try to convince me that what he had with Lilah was healthy or gave him any credit in this department (much as I enjoyed the thing they had). Was this the writers way of telling us, "Hey, just forget about the curse and the continuity of the gang being cautious about the happy clause [which, admittedly, it looked like they were already breaking with the Cordy/Angel crap], we're letting Angel play the field and the odds" ? Huh? Confusedness. :(
A bit more confusion for me...not that it was absolutely integral to the plot, but I expected more of an explanation for the puppet-demons than just "They're demons". I was expecting the demons to mystically come out of the puppet bodies once they were destroyed by the MoG, so...what? Did the demons just decide to become puppets without worrying about how easy they'd be to kill?
Anyway, I kinda loved this ep. Puppets! Puppets Who Kill! (actually that's the name of a great little comedy that's only aired on the Comedy Network in Canada)
Kris | February 19, 11:17 CET
-The WB tv network is owned by TimeWarner a 39.6 billion dollar company(HBO,TNT,CNN,Cartoon Network, New Line Cinema and not to mention 24.3 million AOL members in the US alone)...Time Warner is a distant second in the cable industry but still enough of a powerhouse to be considering a bid on Cablevision...Why do I mention this? Because TimeWarner owns both The WB and TNT...TNT being a possible alternate destination for AtS.
-Viacom, a 26.6 billion dollar company ( owns CBS and UPN...plus MTV, Nickelodeon and BET, as well as Paramount Pictures) Viacom is rumored to rely on advetising revenue for 45% of its total revenue...Not a very comfortable place to be if you are in television media (and not NBC)...
In other words, if we want UPN to pick up Angel we have to convince UPN that Angel will bring in big bucks for advertising time...
Simpleba | February 19, 12:45 CET
As for the puppets they were priceless. Other posters have said they would love to see the entire cast as puppets. That would be a hoot. Angel Broody Face and Captain Cheekbones...oh yeah!!! If anyone wants to offer Angel and Spike puppets for sale...I'm in. Maybe we start a fund raiser to save the show by selling Puppet Angels and Spikes, also Puppet Lorne,Fred,Gunn,and Wes. Ok...Puppet Harm could be cute...but as for Eve...how about Voodoo Doll Eve instead, complete with push pins ? Works for me.
kathylovesspike | February 19, 17:06 CET
gingeriffic | February 19, 17:51 CET
400lb_Gorilla | February 19, 17:53 CET
Just another great part of a great episode.
prufrock | February 19, 18:14 CET
Why, WHY GOD did the WB cancel Angel?!
cubiclesatan | February 19, 18:21 CET
vamRIPire | February 19, 18:26 CET
Coll | February 19, 18:28 CET
Funny, I missed this breast stuff last night. I wasn't really fixating on Nina's breasts. More interested in Puppet Angel. Although the breasts do seize the attention, don't they?
I like Nina as a character much better than I did in Unleashed, but I think I know why I am resistant to her and Angel hooking up. Angel's two (three, if you count Darla) great loves have been that -- great loves, earned over years of intense interaction. If Angel goes on for another season or two on the UPN, then I'm all for the Nina character being developed more as a real love interest. But with nine (now eight?) episodes left, I don't want any quick fix romances for Angel. Although that may not be ME's intention......maybe the Nina character will be more of a casual, lighthearted romantic partner for Angel. On second thought, that might be kind of interesting. Something new, certainly.
phlebotinin | February 19, 18:31 CET
phlebotinin | February 19, 18:37 CET
Caroline | February 19, 18:38 CET
protector | February 19, 18:40 CET
It was funny, it was sad, Knox is freaking out, Wes is kissing people, Lorne was his hilarious best (She wants a piece of Angelcake!), and the Vamp Angel puppet was great.
I get the whole "Angel's moving on and going out with someone" thing, I just don't care for Nina and Angel as a couple. Don't ask - I don't know why, I just don't.
I'm really really happy for Fred and Wes, but come on, we all know this can't end well. Actually allowing Wes to be HAPPY?
meredith | February 19, 19:02 CET
Oh no, Joss, you're not going to fool me again. Even if I hadn't seen the trailer for the next epi, I wouldn't have fallen into that trap again. First thing I said to my hubby after 'the kiss' was, "Well, let's see how long that lasts. Nothing good can come of it...."
PS Anyone else think that Fred shooting the big puppet was remniscent of Wes shooting his father.....or maybe just me...hehehe
Rogue Slayer | February 19, 19:34 CET
Grace | February 19, 19:43 CET
melsta | February 19, 19:51 CET
Chris in Virginia | February 19, 20:03 CET
lala | February 19, 20:32 CET
put the link in here!
thnanks
nicoblu710 | February 19, 21:29 CET
There ya go.
Robo-Ritter | February 19, 22:13 CET
I seriously doubt I could handle that. I would have fallen off the couch! LOL
ktbear7476 | February 19, 22:40 CET
My ship has finally sailed! Weee!
Dumb old fairy tales and their happily ever afters.
electricspacegirl | February 19, 23:21 CET
[ edited by RTADoyle on 2007-10-27 11:34 ]
RTADoyle | February 19, 23:48 CET
Firefly Flanatic | February 19, 23:51 CET
electricspacegirl | February 20, 00:24 CET
Firefly Flanatic | February 20, 01:10 CET
electricspacegirl | February 20, 02:26 CET
Simpleba | February 20, 02:33 CET
Someone has to step in and pick up 'Angel' (Note: The ratings for ST improved over last week's ep!) because no way should a show this smart and vastly superior to all other genre offerings end up on the crap-heap of corporate commercial whoredom.
Wiseblood | February 20, 02:39 CET
400lb_Gorilla | February 20, 02:50 CET
I'm with Wiseblood. I want to have Ben Edlund's spawn.
phlebotinin | February 20, 02:54 CET
(whimpers and tears) “When I heard that Angel was cancelled, I was having fruit punch, and I thought well Spike and Angel and those other vampires will NEVER HAVE anymore fruit punch that looks like blood EVER!!! It’s stupid. It’s mortal and stupid, and no one will explain to me WHY!?!?!?” (turns evil and all-powerful and causes computer equipment to overload)
[ edited by G Thing on 2004-02-20 01:36 ]
G Thing | February 20, 03:26 CET
As for Fred and Wes, yeah there have been looks from Fred for a while. And sometimes people need to wake up to what's in front of them, a theme that was clearly repeated in this last ep.
Personally I'm happy. I like Gunn but in the earlier triangle between him and Wes and Fred I had to root for Wes. I mean Gunn was the cocky suave guy and Wes the quiet, booky shy guy. Wes was definitely the underdog here and I always hate to see the cocky guys get the girl. Go Wes! Long time in coming. And a bit of a vindication in that she came to him now. "Mss Burkle needs a driver" hehehehe
Of course.....next week....their happiness will be 'Jossed'.....
EdDantes | February 20, 04:25 CET
I caught the Janet-shot of Nina. I'm not accepting Angel and Nina as more than a slight interest. I felt Wes' first scene, where he tells Angel to suck it up and get back out in the dating field, was a little out of character. I can't place exactly why, aside from it straying from his normaly cautious self. I want my own Angel puppet, and I was waiting through the whole episode for it to vamp out.
One thing I'd like to point out that no one has mentioned yet.... the scene where the puppet is controlling the puppetmaker... The human was David Fury!! I was trying to see if the puppet voices seemed at all familiar, but I couldn't place anyone.
ETA: Just saw the actual discussion for this episode, and others did pick up on the Fury appearance. I thought it was odd not seeing anyone mention it. :)
[ edited by Greyflowers on 2004-02-21 09:24 ]
Greyflowers | February 21, 11:11 CET