April 18 2006
First review of Serenity on HD-DVD.
"...given the grungy look of the film, it is not really prime demo material". There's also another review at TechLiving. And The Digital Bits - "It's just utterly clean and clear without being too crisp or edgy - a very natural looking and extremely pleasing image".
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Boo!
eddy | April 18, 18:49 CET
TychoCelchuuu | April 18, 19:08 CET
My first post, yeah :)
mei_mei | April 18, 19:14 CET
MaryQue | April 18, 19:21 CET
Blu-RayHD-DVD version?eddy | April 18, 19:25 CET
How dare he? How can someone forget Buffy, the Vampire Slayer the Movie. And there's also Alien Ressurrection and Titan A.E.
"Gypsies.... "spit""
Numfar PTB | April 18, 19:28 CET
gossi | April 18, 19:32 CET
Numfar PTB | April 18, 19:38 CET
bobster | April 18, 20:30 CET
Answers.com also includes Serenity on their list of box office bombs, which I hadn't noticed before :o(
(Although, it has to be said when you look at that list, you realise the gap with Serenity's box office isn't actually that bad, compared to the rest)
[ edited by gossi on 2006-04-18 18:40 ]
gossi | April 18, 20:35 CET
As far as the whole flop issue...DVD, DVD, DVD! I know MANY lazy former theater goers who are discovering the 'verse at home and are head over heels for it. Serenity was never going to be Star Wars...and we can all be glad for that on multiple levels, even if we would've liked to see similar box office receipts. I have a sneaking suspicion Joss and Co. will both work again in this town and continue to put food, perhaps even high-end organic produce, on the table for their families.
MrArg | April 18, 20:55 CET
Simon | April 18, 20:57 CET
bovik | April 18, 21:10 CET
ETA: I looked through the review, and it is quite good. With the exception of the bitter beginning, it sounded like the guy had a vendetta against Joss Whedon and the fandom, he/she seemed to enjoy the movie. Maybe it will convince Whedon-haters to check out the film.
[ edited by kurya on 2006-04-18 19:34 ]
kurya | April 18, 21:25 CET
Angel TheVampire | April 18, 21:30 CET
eddy | April 18, 22:25 CET
Lioness | April 18, 22:41 CET
Nevertheless, we can at least bandy around that statistic!
orangewaxlion | April 18, 22:43 CET
bobster | April 18, 23:09 CET
[ edited by bigsofty on 2006-04-18 23:01 ]
bigsofty | April 18, 23:46 CET
Has anyone here already seen the HD-DVD version? I would like to hear how they think the movie looks.
Celebithil | April 19, 00:18 CET
As for the review, the review also failed to mention if the menu system is the same as the DVD, or if they took advantage of the new features available to these new formats. I'll assume his lack of mentioning it means it is the same.
Sounds like this omission is good reason to wait until Universal gets the hang of it. Plus their generic packaging is terrible; that "beer can" template won't last. They'll eventually re-release it with a proper cover (if the format flies).
will.bueche | April 19, 02:44 CET
will.bueche | April 19, 02:50 CET
zeitgeist | April 19, 02:59 CET
The Dark Shape | April 19, 04:12 CET
gossi | April 19, 13:18 CET