July 02
2006
England for the World Cup says Alyson Hannigan.
Unfortunately despite Willow's endorsement, England lost 3-1 to Portugal on penalties earlier today.
Simon
| Cast&Crew
| 01:57 CET
|
34 comments total
| tags: world cup, alyson hannigan
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Tim Minear talks about Drive.
|
Clash of the Comics Titans.
Newer »
© 2002 - 2008 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
Apocalypse | July 02, 02:04 CET
Christopher | July 02, 02:05 CET
jerryst3161 | July 02, 02:08 CET
I say the home team, Germany, will take it
impalergeneral | July 02, 02:22 CET
Rogue Slayer | July 02, 02:36 CET
gossi | July 02, 02:47 CET
[ edited by bookworm on 2006-07-02 01:02 ]
bookworm | July 02, 02:57 CET
jam2 | July 02, 03:19 CET
I predict a France-Germany final. France played well in beating Spain and Brazil so shouldn't have too much trouble with Portugal.
Yefa | July 02, 03:53 CET
???
wouldestous | July 02, 04:07 CET
gossi | July 02, 04:11 CET
Honestly though, I feel worse for Brazil.
Bad Kitty | July 02, 04:13 CET
Oh and bookworm? You just met her. But then again I was born there so...
Kessie | July 02, 04:43 CET
theyarescientists | July 02, 05:03 CET
whosflyingthisthing? | July 02, 05:55 CET
I wouldn't blame Sven for the way that England ended their run in this World Cup. The competition in the final's stage has been white hot and there's a thin line between success and failure. Would England with the current team have won the World Cup outright with someone like Hiddink at the helm? I'd say it would have made no difference.
Hold your head up high England. This was a most entertaining match. And to go down on penalties should be no cause for shame.
[ edited by StaffOSimon on 2006-07-02 04:59 ]
StaffOSimon | July 02, 06:58 CET
At least rooney got to step on a man's groin before leaving the game. I wonder how many times that has happened in any sport.
You've obviously never seen hubby and I play UFC! :~D
Rogue Slayer | July 02, 07:05 CET
Harpy | July 02, 08:28 CET
starbreez | July 02, 09:49 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | July 02, 11:05 CET
:(
neptunepirate | July 02, 11:10 CET
Caroline | July 02, 11:55 CET
I really think they deserved to beat Portugal.
There, I said it. And I don't even feel that nauseated ;).
Sure England's performance up to now has been lacklustre (to be generous) but I think they played OK in the first half while Portugal never really comitted men forward or looked that threatening in attack.
Also, i've watched it a few times now and I still don't see that Rooney's nut stamping was deliberate (and I normally have very little time for him and his tantrums) and actually showed rare restraint for him given that he'd been fouled at least twice leading up to the incident. Give him a yellow for the push and dissent (he kept his hands down so no need for a red on that basis, IMO) and get on with the game (that said, I may get a chance to watch it totally sober today and change my opinion completely ;).
And I agree that they played with a lot of guts after going down to ten but what is it with England and penalties ? Given their record over the last 20 years they must've taken literally thousands in training and they still can't just put them away. Crazy.
Anyway, bad luck guys (even if you did make a rod for your own backs) and Come on, Germany !
(and in unrelated news, go on Murray, ya wee beauty. As usual, when England's fat's in the fryer there's a Scot there to pull ye out and keep the British end up ;)
Saje | July 02, 14:12 CET
I'm Scottish, and I agree :o
Grounded | July 02, 14:19 CET
and portugal should've never been good enough to beat england;
hopes up for italy: Italy - France, that's the only final I'd watch now (with the loss of Argentina and Brasil, yeah I'm sucker for the old classics: Uruguay, Uruguay!!!)
[ edited by bookworm on 2006-07-02 15:54 ]
bookworm | July 02, 15:17 CET
England certainly began to play better after David Beckham was taken off. His desire (arguably) might not be in question but he under-performed in a major tournament yet again and he no longer has the pace he once possessed. His contribution to the team is, I would say, greatly diminished these days. The sending off of Wayne Rooney was fully deserved, I think. I saw nothing but intent in the stamping. I will say they were clearly the better side after that, although I am still not sure what Peter Crouch brings to the team apart from increasing the average height calculation. The problem is that for the first 50 minutes they were mediocre at best, giving the same tired, uninspired performance they had done in the first four games. They still can’t string together passes, retain possession of the ball or alter their game plan when it is clearly not working. Do they even have a game plan?
They did well to get as far as they did, given the dreary nature of their performances, but they were not exactly up against world-class opposition. Their alleged match winners all failed to perform and I'm not particularly sorry to see them exit. Yes, they were better than the constantly erratic Portuguese team on the day, but the bizarre tactics of their coach in playing Rooney out of position up front on his own to one side, why didn't they manage to score a goal before the sending off? Did they ever look like scoring in that first hour?
France and Germany have got better with each match. Even the over-hyped and under-performing Brazil had moments of brillance. Italy are still (as ever) a threat and seem to be playing to a more adventurous, attacking game plan than in previous tournaments. Argentina, who I think were the best team in the competition, were spellbinding on occasions before their exit. England never gave a performnce to match any of these teams, at least not that I saw.
Having said all of that, I am hardly an expert about the "beautiful game" (I'm more of a cricket man, myself) so I'm probably just talking out of my arse!
alien lanes | July 02, 15:21 CET
I also agree about the system Eriksson chose to play. Just crazy (and personally I think he's been a liability for years now, just as Volks was for Scotland). True, Rooney likes to run at defences and has the strength to hold the ball up but he can't do it all himself. The team looked out of sorts and like they were just barely keeping it together with 4-5-1 and even though Crouch may be a bit variable at least he could have brought balls down to Rooney's feet and England could've maybe got something from the good old 'route 1' stand-by tactic (OK, it's dull to watch but it works, especially with a 6' 7" forward).
Did England deserve to win the tournament ? No chance. In fact, i'd argue they only got out of the group stage because of the low grade opposition but I do think they were better than Portugal on the night and more willing to chance going forward (not to mention gutsy with ten men) and so deserved to win that particular game.
Re: the stamping, well, i'm definitely going to have to watch it again without the beer goggles on ;).
I'm going with Germany now because a) they're the host nation so it just seems polite ;), b) they're starting to play some good, entertaining footie, c) they play a fairly clean game (not too much diving, holding face when hit in chest etc.) and d) Klinsman has a bit of passion about him and actually seems to care about his players and team's success (i'm not very demonstrative myself so I understand Eriksson being a quiet sort of bloke but it's the frikkin World Cup finals for pity's sake, if you can't show emotion there as a football manager, where can you ?).
Anyway, i'm also far from an expert so it's just one neutral's (well, ish ;) opinion. Not really into cricket though I actually did attend my first live game last week and quite enjoyed it (at least partly because it was a 20-20 and so all over pretty quickly ;).
Saje | July 02, 16:04 CET
That's the problem - neither player can be a lone striker. After he came on, Crouch won 90% of the balls played to him and held them up, but because there was no second striker and limited midfield support he had no outlet.
Grounded | July 02, 18:50 CET
Medusa | July 02, 21:51 CET
Harpy | July 03, 04:38 CET
Yeah, when the Dutch were knocked out(and hello, what was Van Nistelrooy doing on the bench??), hubby decided he'd be for the English, then after them, the Germans....I think he's hoping it doesn't come down to rooting for France; but I'm personally okay with either France or Germany in the end. They're the only ones who didn't either knock out the Netherlands, or play an ugly game against the US!
Rogue Slayer | July 03, 05:56 CET
Even though there is a rivalry between Germany and England when it comes to football, I start to feel sorry for them. Penalties is just not there thing! And I already heard about dutch people cheering for Germany. That's so weird.
And I am sorry bookworm, but: "54, 74, 90, 2006, ja da stimmen wir alle ein. Mit dem Herz in der Hand und der Leidenschaft im Bein, werden wir Weltmeister sein!"
(Sorry, you feel so pissed, mayby you should have left your country for a week to join the fun...)
Anyway - I think, it has been a great party so far and that a lot of fans came together to celebrate their passion peacefully. Fans from opposed team partied together without any fighting until now. The public viewing places are packed with people in colorfull outfits and make-up (I even met people from Trinidad and Tobago!) That's really awesome and I am hoping for a great last week.
Akela | July 03, 18:12 CET
I wanted England to win(I'm always for England, unless they're playing against my country). And they actually played better than Portugal(good improvement since the game against Equador:S)....damn.
fadalow | July 03, 18:54 CET
bookworm | July 04, 11:20 CET