Only one man can save the budget.
Article in the Times about the use of unknown actors in major movies uses Joss's intention of casting an unknown actress as Wonder Woman as an example.
It mentions the unsubstantiated rumours about Pryanka Chopra in the article.
July 02 2006
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


[ edited by gossi on 2006-07-02 04:35 ]
gossi | July 02, 06:35 CET
I'm not English or all that smart about journalism, but didn't the The Times used to be a real newspaper with fact-checking and stuff?
dreamlogic | July 02, 06:58 CET
TamaraC | July 02, 07:36 CET
TamaraC: here's your prediction of three days ago coming true: from unchecked facts of the IMDB to the world, Let the rumours soar.
*snerkle*
Harpy | July 02, 08:23 CET
TamaraC | July 02, 09:02 CET
Do you really think an overworked underpaid professional rumourmonger with a deadline does more than ask other rumourmongers? If it's not relevant to a Pulitzer Piece, that is. At least I hope so.
[ edited by Harpy on 2006-07-02 07:18 ]
Harpy | July 02, 09:14 CET
dreamlogic | July 02, 09:34 CET
Why is there no fact-checking at all? Why is a rumor placed as pure fact? Not even a "reportedly" in the sentence!
ARGH!
XanFan32 | July 02, 09:56 CET
How exactly did it happen that this board is the only location on the Internet where finding the facts matters? (It's hard out here for truthiness, yo.)
billz | July 02, 11:57 CET
Simon | July 02, 12:09 CET
billz | July 02, 12:53 CET
gossi | July 02, 16:28 CET
The Ninja Report | July 02, 19:26 CET
petranef | July 02, 19:48 CET
(my emphasis)
Oh, the irony ;).
Agreed about Wikipedia. It's a good idea, maybe even a great one but it's by no means authoritative (same applies to IMDB, AICN etc.). That said, 'The Times' is considered authoritative and look at the standard of information they provide so i'm not sure how much meaning 'authoritative' has anymore (i've seen 'The Guardian' spread unsubstantiated rubbish in print as well though I can't remember exact details since it was years ago but it was a fairly well known internet hoax reported as fact even though just checking snopes.com or somewhere similar would've shown it to be bunk. Very lazy journalism).
So, if we start a rumour that Serenity 2 is now in production, and post it around lots of places, it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy, yes? ;)
"My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Joss writing 'Serenity 2: The Wrath of Badger' at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious."
Pass it on.
(and yep, I got the quote to mangle from IMDB, irony upon irony ;)
Saje | July 02, 19:56 CET
The Ninja Report | July 02, 20:00 CET
wouldestous | July 02, 20:34 CET
SpikeBad | July 02, 20:44 CET
[ edited by theonetruebix on 2006-07-02 19:20 ]
The One True b!X | July 02, 21:20 CET
I think once is enough.
Simon | July 02, 21:32 CET
gossi | July 03, 01:59 CET
TamaraC | July 03, 02:23 CET
Simon | July 03, 02:35 CET
I saw bits and pieces everywhere and thought--"Hmm, so many sources reporting on this..." But until I hear it from Joss' mouth (or his fingers...though from his mouth would also be quite the awesome) I will stay quiet. I'm quite glad my post was deleted before too many people questioned the count of my brain cells. ;)
Ethereal Raine | July 03, 04:55 CET
The Ninja Report | July 03, 05:05 CET
postedsaw it on IMDB myself. ;-)[ edited by billz on 2006-07-03 06:08 ]
billz | July 03, 08:07 CET
I'm still just too amused by the idea of Wonder Woman as a Bollywood musical. :-)
And we're all happy about Serenity 2, of course, but didn't Joss say that he wouldn't stoop to the level of twins or clones to get Alan and Ron back for the sequel? Because apparently there's a character described as 'Wash's brother' in the script. I can guess who's going to play that.
Niels | July 03, 18:14 CET
What ?
Saje | July 03, 19:21 CET
billz | July 04, 01:56 CET
Morri | July 05, 06:08 CET