July 23 2006
Sarah Michelle Gellar in talks for Resident Evil 3?
According to IMDb, Sarah Michelle Gellar is in talks to play Cindy Lennox. IMDb sometimes gets false info though.
This thread has been closed for new comments.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
Bit of an understatement there. Most recent example; according to IMDB Michelle Trachtenberg is to play a recurring character on Veronica Mars, but the character has been filled by another actor.
Ashley | July 23, 18:22 CET
eddy | July 23, 18:23 CET
Djungelurban | July 23, 18:37 CET
@theonetruebix | July 23, 18:40 CET
Much in the same way water is wet sometimes.
tinktanker | July 23, 18:49 CET
QuoterGal | July 23, 18:53 CET
I liked the first film. The second one was... uhm... shit, for me at least.
gossi | July 23, 19:06 CET
whosflyingthisthing? | July 23, 19:19 CET
I wouldn't hold it against her if she's in it. Works work. Plus, you never know, the script might be okay. Well, possibly. Wasn't David Boreanaz supposed to be in RE1, but couldn't due to the Angel schedule?
gossi | July 23, 19:28 CET
At this stage of her career, there's no way she'd be joining a franchise in part 3... unless it was a cameo in a Spidey film or something.
[ edited by Impossible on 2006-07-24 02:47 ]
Impossible | July 23, 19:46 CET
cheryl | July 23, 21:22 CET
Mort | July 23, 21:37 CET
The Grudge 2 wrapped shooting a long while ago.
The Dark Shape | July 23, 23:08 CET
Of course not, it's much easier to complain :-)
Wikipedia is even easier to change - everyone can edit it!
Of course, there's no way we can really know if SMG is in talks for RE3 anyway. Usually if it says "in talks" in IMDb there's something to back it up - it's a holdover from IMDbPro, parts of which they've integrated into regular IMDb now (such as the pics beside each actors name on a film's page).
I also don't think - given the sheer amount of info on the IMDb - it can be accused of having a large number of errors in it. Sure, sometimes I think it should have a better system of verification, but there's usually a good balance.
crossoverman | July 23, 23:11 CET
Simon | July 24, 01:19 CET
Yo yo vich!
will.bueche | July 24, 01:22 CET
Resident Evil 4 is a terrific game but my heart will always belong to the second one. I've never played the ones that came out for the Gamecube though.
Simon | July 24, 01:37 CET
Recently the have had alot of Eliza Dushku castings too. All false.
Donna Troy | July 24, 02:12 CET
If this was a physics website i'd imagine posting wikipedia articles about the latest break-through would be similarly frowned upon.
ETA: reading this back it sounds a bit harsh on the article poster, hitnrun017, which wasn't my intent. Just seems a good idea to have a general 'policy' about IMDB posts (unless there's also independent verification).
[ edited by Saje on 2006-07-24 10:44 ]
Saje | July 24, 03:29 CET
Thomas | July 24, 04:02 CET
Simon | July 24, 04:15 CET
Tmas | July 24, 05:33 CET
Snakes on a island.
eddy | July 24, 05:40 CET
gossi | July 24, 05:46 CET
jpr | July 24, 05:51 CET
jamie_marsters | July 24, 06:13 CET
Are they motherfucking Polar bears ? Cos then i'd pay literally cash to see it.
Saje | July 24, 06:43 CET
Samuel Jackson vs Ian McShane in M****rf*ck*ng Snakes vs C*ck*s*ck*ng Polar bears, a certain segment of the moviegoing audience would go wild.
ETA : A natural extra for the DVD would be a commentary track by McNulty and Bunk (The Wire) solely consisting of F*ck, M****rf*ck*r, F***ck etc. etc. similar to their famous crimescene investigation dialogue.
I'd be first in line to pre-order this invaluable language teaching tool :)
[ edited by jpr on 2006-07-24 14:55 ]
jpr | July 24, 07:03 CET
I'd pay *folding* money to see that!
As for the IMDB debate, it's a wonderful resource but one needs to take the info within with a large rock of salt, particularly when it doesn't follow logic... as with the idea of Smidge doing RE3. :-)
OzLady | July 24, 07:10 CET
Then the fact that the RE franchise should be dead long before now. The first was ok, mindless fun, but the second was repetitive and even more unoriginal, so a third one is unnecessary. It wouldn't be fitting for a star on the rise like Sarah to be in a film that is the descent of a franchise.
Razor | July 24, 14:51 CET
Hrm, because everything linked to here is authoritative and always correct! :)
Mort | July 24, 18:59 CET