November 03 2006
Serenity producer talks about that legal thing.
A lovely little note from Chris Buchanan about 11th Hour's now concluded case with Universal. Slyck picked up on the issue yesterday, whilst iFMagazine give a slightly mixed final message.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


havok | November 03, 18:54 CET
It makes me ponder.
Tho its lovely of Chris to post, I notice his username is the same as one I saw posting on here the other day?
More ponderings.
ETA: Errrr...maybe I was wrong about that last bit. Ignore it ppl.
[ edited by nixygirl on 2006-11-03 18:12 ]
nixygirl | November 03, 20:03 CET
gossi | November 03, 21:29 CET
Matt_Fabb | November 03, 21:29 CET
And now I'm going shopping at 11th Hour's site. I see some neat things that will make wonderful Christmas gifts, for my non-Serenity/Firefly fan family members as well as for the ones who are.
Kyrax | November 03, 23:17 CET
kurya | November 03, 23:29 CET
On the plus side, we now have a better idea of what will and won't fly as far as fan-made merchandise goes. Couple more C&D letters and we should be able to nail this down :)
C. A. Bridges | November 04, 09:08 CET
I think Universal Studios handled this matter poorly, there were certainly other methods available to protect (and promote) their copyright, I'm kinda' confused why they zeroed in on the top performer?
Again, I'm at a loss. This seems senseless.
Madhatter | November 04, 23:15 CET
After finally discovering what the issue was, it's stunning that such punitive and aggressive measures were being pursued against me. Months before Serenity was released, and back in the day where there was no licensed merchandise, I created an original image meant for fellow Browncoats to help put the word of "serenity" out in the world (as Universal encouraged us to do) in a simple, low key way. And this was an image that was only featured on some shirt backs on one page from my Cafe Press shop. I frankly forgot about it, and people wanted those shirts for the original art that was on the front anyway.
I still don't know why my shop was targeted when there were other shops which featured replicated official graphics and logos. Now understand, I wouldn't wish the kind of legal action I've been through on anyone. It's just that the way it all came down... doesn't make any sense.
11thHour | November 05, 00:54 CET
To be honest, I doubt the legal firm had a very high tech or thoughtful way of doing this. They will have used search engines, almost certainly, to search around.
As your lawyer said, your store looked professionally done. BlueSunShirts.com looked a bit like an official FOX site - it had logos, screen caps and stuff gallore.
gossi | November 05, 00:58 CET
11thHour | November 05, 01:02 CET
[ edited by Madhatter on 2006-11-04 23:44 ]
Madhatter | November 05, 01:43 CET