(SPOILER)
What does Jane Espenson think of tonight's new Battlestar ep?
Ms. Espenson, who wrote next week's episode of BSG, has high praise for tonight's edition.
From AICN:
The great Jane Espenson, who scripted next week’s episode (“Passage”) of “Battlestar Galactica,” says this about tonight’s installment:
“Imagine being told you're following this. I'm the act that follows The Beatles."
December 01 2006
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


That said, I'm now looking forward to this episode even more (the two-week wait has been hard, even with holiday mirth tossed in). If JE has such high praise for it, it must be top-notch.
palehorse | December 01, 22:47 CET
Wish I could be in the room when these two break a story together.
Madhatter | December 01, 23:13 CET
I think Jane's too humble.
chickenbird | December 01, 23:31 CET
Resolute | December 02, 02:59 CET
Sorry I dont have a link it's from Creative Screenwriting newsletter that I receive ever week.
"How many rewrites do you typically go through on an episode?
It all depends on the episode. Generally, each episode goes through a great deal of re-writing. During the episode I was working on last week, "Dirty Hands," which I co-wrote with Jane Espenson [Gilmore Girls, Tru Calling], originally it was just going to be [set] on Galactica. Then we decided to set it elsewhere. Then you have to go back and change all the scenes. President Roslin, now she's in her home environment working at her desk, and it changes the story. It's like a river, because when one episode changes, another episode changes. "
werealljustfloating | December 02, 04:04 CET
delirium_haze | December 02, 07:08 CET
Pumps | December 02, 07:57 CET
skeezycheeses | December 02, 08:52 CET
delirium_haze | December 02, 09:11 CET
Madhatter | December 02, 09:40 CET
I'm really looking forward to Jane's episode next week, too. Especially after this start. We're ready for some plot stuff again, and she can bring the character development too. Perfect.
gilraen | December 02, 09:57 CET
Lady Brick | December 02, 21:52 CET
werealljustfloating | December 03, 02:17 CET
I took my hands away from my ears, stopped singing "La, la, la" and watched it, and
It. Was. Good.
Now I understand all the fuss, and must go out today and buy and start watching them, so curse, curse, curse all of you and many, many thanks.
This show would appear to rock the proverbial Casbah.
QuoterGal | December 03, 02:40 CET
dreamlogic | December 03, 03:17 CET
Luckily, some of them can be done in front of the tube.
But damnit, this couldn't come at a worse time...
QuoterGal | December 03, 04:00 CET
Oh, actual topic? Last night's episode: liked the boxing, so glad the infamous Kara/Lee rift was explained but would have rather seen more evidence that the 'ship with the most chemistry, Bill and Laura, had finally, uh, sailed.
narnia | December 03, 05:34 CET
And, sharin' the love for the new ep. Rocked in every way, except, poor D! I'd be happy to console her, if need be. ;-)
billz | December 03, 12:26 CET
So "Black Market" is not a great ep? Guess they left out the Beagles ;)
Passion | December 03, 15:24 CET
This says so much about the quality of the storytelling. And the fact that Jane Espenson is writing some eps for BSG is just sheer extra gravy.
QuoterGal | December 03, 21:35 CET
Passion, no Beagles, but the episode does bear a resemblance to their "smallish droppings." ;)
And billz--you can console Dee; I'll comfort Anders. I'd aim for Helo (sigh), but for Sharon's wrath. I imagine that beside her not wantint to take off her hard-won tags,it would have been an unacceptable risk to the crew to allow her in the ring.
So psyched for Jane's episodes.
Edited because a triple negative is nobody's friend.
[ edited by narnia on 2006-12-04 03:43 ]
[ edited by narnia on 2006-12-04 03:44 ]
narnia | December 04, 01:37 CET
A brilliant episode - all character, no plot. Gotta love it.
crossoverman | December 04, 01:49 CET
Resolute | December 04, 04:08 CET
[ edited by billz on 2006-12-04 03:19 ]
billz | December 04, 05:18 CET
[ edited by narnia on 2006-12-04 03:40 ]
[ edited by narnia on 2006-12-04 03:40 ]
narnia | December 04, 05:39 CET
war_machine | December 04, 17:38 CET
Gudlyf | December 05, 19:52 CET