January 30
2007
Kristen Bell gets asked the ultimate Buffyverse guest star question.
On whether she'd want Sarah Michelle Gellar guesting on Veronica Mars, Kristen says "Oh, of course we'd take that! That would be amazing. Yeah!".
Simon
| Cast&Crew
| 22:44 CET
|
58 comments total
| tags: kristen bell, veronica mars, buffy, sarah michelle gellar
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
(SPOILER)
Sundance Interview: Nathan Fillion...
|
Moonlight Rising postpones con to ...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
Dana5140 | January 30, 23:09 CET
dreamlogic | January 30, 23:36 CET
I lost interest half way through season two so I don't think I'll personally miss it too much if it ends this year.
Technopagan | January 30, 23:55 CET
mikejer | January 31, 00:02 CET
That said, I'd love to see SMG guest star.
fortunateizzi | January 31, 00:15 CET
Wincing, but agreeing.
I love VM, even though Season 2's finale made me cross-eyed with irritation and confusion, and Season 3 has been so low-key as to be nearly invisible. Three interrelated problems have cropped up since the mostly stellar S1:
1) Rob Thomas couldn't come up with a mystery to match the death of Lily Kane. The "bus crash" mystery didn't resonate nearly as deeply, and the plot itself was terrifyingly convoluted.
2) Veronica left high school, and there's no compelling reason for some of these characters to be on the show anymore. The VM/Logan 'ship, while popular, feels played out to me. (On the flip side, Teddy Dunn's Duncan Kane was written out at exactly the right time, but in a way that almost destroyed his character AND Veronica's.)
3) Budget constraints. Rob Thomas can't have all the regulars on at the same time, and the forced lack of ensemble chemistry drains the life out of the show.
I reluctantly agree with Dana that this'll be the last season. I'd like an S4 mystery to match S1, but I don't think we'll get it.
[ edited by cjl on 2007-01-30 23:37 ]
cjl | January 31, 00:23 CET
MrArg | January 31, 00:37 CET
[ edited by TwisTz on 2007-01-30 23:45 ]
TwisTz | January 31, 01:43 CET
It's the only series right now I have to watch. I'll miss it if its gone.
bigsofty | January 31, 01:48 CET
maje | January 31, 02:15 CET
The Operative | January 31, 02:25 CET
As originally conceived, our heroine was a feisty, whip-smart, independent girl with enough moxie to last a lifetime. The clever quips are still coming, but this season, Veronica seems like a whole new person. She's angry and clingy, needlessly chewing out boyfriend Logan (Jason Dohring) one minute and then falling into his arms the next. These two are supposed to be in a very complex relationship -- after all, his father did murder Veronica's best friend (and Logan's former girlfriend). This season, however, the couple has been dumbed down to the point where it feels like they belong on another CW show -- "One Tree Hill." And while the legion of Dohring fans would be aghast at the thought, it might actually be better for "Veronica" the show and Veronica the character if Logan quietly went away. His story essentially ended when his dad was killed at the end of last season, and unless his presumed-dead mom returns, Logan's tale is told. Time to move on, Veronica. Nobody likes it when you're mopey about your dreamy but troubled boyfriend all the time.
If anyone cares to read more, you'll find my column here.
I did enjoy last week's episode. Maybe this second arc will be a return to form.
rbt | January 31, 02:38 CET
I honestly can't remember another show that went from 'truly exceptional' to 'just okay' so fast. The plotting simply falls apart. Most shows are just starting to flex their muscles in their second season, so for the love of God, 'Wha' happen?'
(I did love Joss' S2 cameo, though - especially his contribution to the outtakes. 'We're like minstrels in the days of old!')
ETA the right quote - thanks Quoter Gal.
[ edited by Mythtaken on 2007-01-31 14:56 ]
Mythtaken | January 31, 03:27 CET
But I liked the second season plenty too, so maybe I just have... different tastes or whatever...
And to stay on topic: if they could fit her in in a way that wasn't "hey look it's SMG" then this would be pretty cool.
[ edited by Jobo on 2007-01-31 01:51 ]
Jobo | January 31, 03:51 CET
cheryl | January 31, 03:52 CET
onthedrift | January 31, 04:06 CET
It's not the tiresome LoVe relationship that's dragging the show down, it's the fact that they haven't been able to devise an arc as compelling as the Lilly Kane mystery and that Veronica isn't emotionally engaged in the storylines as she was in S1. Can't blame her -- the writers have made her more of a procedural detective ala L&O than an avenging angel of justice, and the show lives or dies by her passion.
No passion in Veronica = a very blah TV show.
dottikin | January 31, 04:12 CET
loa | January 31, 04:15 CET
Dana5140 | January 31, 05:03 CET
I agree that there's too much Veronica-Logan stuff (and I LIKE them together) and that her character is getting a little too abrasive and unlikable. I hope that both of those phenomena are actually set up for character change and realization. I hope.
Septimus | January 31, 05:58 CET
Of course, I'm one who also loved season 4 of BtVS.
Reddygirl | January 31, 06:34 CET
rbt | January 31, 07:04 CET
mikejer | January 31, 07:05 CET
And tonights ep...meh.
Dana5140 | January 31, 07:06 CET
I haven't seen tonight's episode yet, so no spoilers please. Damn you, Australian TV!
non sequitur | January 31, 07:23 CET
If I'm not mistaken, I read recently the CW wants the format to be switched to all stand-alone episodes. I wish I could remember where I read that. Linked to from the .org VM thread? Perhaps. Wish I didn't have to work now and could dig that up. Anyway, on VM switching to stand-alone eps? I'm done. I fell in love with the STORY and how it played out over time in Season One. As for the "new" stand alone format, that's just some speculation really... consider it rumor until there's an offical announcement somewhere.
I would totally tune in to watch SMG guest star on VM.
After the second rape story arc (the first was well done and the second completely lame), I stopped caring to be home. I actually am fine with Keith and the cheating. But two rape arcs in less than three years turned VM into a public service announcement. Completely and utterly IMHO.
I plan to get the Season 3 DVDs to tie up a few loose ends I won't be catching over the next few months. Done.
WhoIsOmega? | January 31, 08:44 CET
Please?
Anusien | January 31, 09:06 CET
Why not ask her how she would feel about actually playing Buffy? SMG is not digging her Buffy roots anymore, so it's not like it would hurt anyone's feelings. Sure wouldn't hurt mine.
Eason | January 31, 10:12 CET
dreamlogic | January 31, 11:15 CET
Michael Muhney | January 31, 12:45 CET
Simon | January 31, 12:59 CET
'Course I understand those who don't like VM, they have their own show, Smallsville, to keep up with. And that's okay. I'm sure most of them are too busy text messaging Oliver Queer to watch VM. Any show that makes Lois Lane into a floozy by having her make out with the entire JLA is, well, one of the shows I mentioned above.
And SMG? Ah, the 2 tiny blonde ones together on the screen. I may pass out.
Someone a long time ago mentioned that KB would make an excellent Fray for the mini-series of the same name, if it should it be made. May Joss's will be done on the small screen as it is in the comics. Amen.
Oh, and Jason Dohring for Wonder Woman. Booyeah!
RazorBlade | January 31, 13:22 CET
I agree with most of the points made though probably just not as vehemently. Veronica and Keith's character transitions have been a bit too sudden but I mean from 'smart private detectives' to 'when the plot requires it, very dumb private detectives'.
Sounds to me as if folk no longer 'like' the people the characters have become and so are losing interest which is fine, that's up to the individual (and also strikes me as part of people's problem with Buffy S6 and 7) but Keith has an affair ? Welcome to the world, where good men do bad things all the time because, wait for it, they're human beings who sometimes make mistakes (granted it seems as if V forgave him a bit too quickly and that lack of arc-ish character consistency and development is one of my biggest issues with S3).
Also, Veronica jumps to the wrong conclusions because she can't trust people ? Much as I have issues with the way it's sometimes been done it seems like this is just demonstrating the not-so-cool aspect of being extremely cynical about the world and the people in it. In S1 her attitude fit (and she was more or less always represented as correct in maintaining it) because the 'whole world' really was against her, now though she's like a war-dog, conditioned to respond in only one way and, unfortunately, completely unfit for 'civilian' life and it might be interesting to watch her find out why this 'Veronica Mars, PI' persona she's built for herself just isn't going to work in the long run without modification (since having her put down seems kinda harsh ;).
So to me, S1 > S2 > S3 but personally i'm still interested in seeing how Veronica deals with her own strange little world (Rob Thomas can still pull it back and actually has the chance to do something interesting about today's 'all been done' jaded, cynical attitude towards the world). The skis are lined up and the engine's revving but Veronica hasn't jumped the shark quite yet. Everyone's mileage will vary though ;).
(and welcome Michael Muhney ;)
Saje | January 31, 13:26 CET
Don't know if this is what you were talking about, April, but it's a comment from Rob Thomas that confirms what you were saying.
From Ask Ausiello
If that really would be the plan for the fourth season then I'm afraid that would be the final nail in the coffin for any interest I had in the show. I suspect the same is true for many others, especially around here. The continuing story arc was the main reason that I enjoyed the first season to the extent that I did. Stand-alone episodes would kill VM, in my opinion.
Technopagan | January 31, 14:30 CET
*sigh*
And I liked this show so much...
My personal feeling is - based on no real evidence other than I firmly understand that this is how TV often works - the terribly-in-flux network execs tried to "fix" VM to get better ratings and ended up breaking what wasn't broken but was not popular enough to make good advertising dough. This happens too much in this town when those execs don't really get why something is good. They break it trying to take it apart to fix it to make it "run better."
Mythtaken, I too loved Jossir's cameo, and 'specially his outtake, which maketh me laugh and more just thinking about it. I've pasted in the transcript below {SPOILER}, which I typed up 'cause I hadda have it to feed my OCD.
And howdy and welcome, Sheriff MM, sure wish you could expound, too. I'd give some folding cashy money to hear your stories...
"Renting cars is a basic human need, like eating or sleeping or trying on shoes…. We’re like the minstrels of old. I think about these things, okay? We’re like the minstrels of old, going from town to town, maybe singing, maybe entertaining people. People need that, the way they need to rent cars…. See, I’m thinking about these things in my off hours. What are you thinking about? You’re not even here when you’re here, okay? I’m here, I’m doubly here, there’s two of me. I’m in the front, I’m in the back. I’m working here, I’m helping them. Why? Because there’s none of you. Maybe you should just think, “What can I do better? What could be better about me, about Stacey? Stacey who works at Lariat, who works for Lariat, okay, who is a Lariat girl."
QuoterGal | January 31, 15:00 CET
link:
Simon | January 31, 15:10 CET
In my haste to help April out with the link to Rob Thomas' comment I somehow missed your post, Michael. Really rude of me not to say hi and welcome. That will teach me not to finish reading down the thread. :)
It is a shame that you can't say more but I'm sure we all understand why.
Technopagan | January 31, 16:28 CET
And steady on, did someone just call me a Smallville fan?! Just because I said I'm disappointed in the wobbliness of VM - a show whose first season I loved so wholeheartedly that it occupied almost all my waking thoughts, I even had to ring a friend at midnight while screaming at the top of my lungs like my mother at a Beatles concert the first time Logan and Veronica kissed - surely doesn't merit me such a grievous insult! ;D Ah, just kidding. Poor old Smallville.
And yay for MICHAEL MUHNEY. You give that nasty Sheriff a lot of nuance, despite a lack of same in the written material. Wish we really knew the story with the Sherriff's father, or at least got a few more hints. (How do you spell Sherrif, she wonders. It always ends up looking like Omar Sharif)
Enough whining from me. Of course, I'll still be watching - even at it's wobbliest, it's better than watching quasi-celebrities fight each other in the jungle or yet another police procedural.
Here here (or is it, hear hear?) to whoever suggested Kristen Bell for Fray. She'd rock summa that futuristc axe-wielding shit.
Mythtaken | January 31, 17:18 CET
But even in the episodes where Wallace, Keith, Lamb and Mac appear, they're not given anything particular interesting to do anymore. When's the last time anyone saw Mac helping Veronica with her tech savvy in some new and creative way instead of just tagging along to some party? And Wallace has really only stood out in one episode so far this year -- the prison experiment episode (which is also one of the few times Logan's been put to good use).
Also, they're not replacing the great supporting characters of past seasons with folks that are equally compelling. Again, quoting my own column: Remember Clarence Wiedman, head of security for Kane Software? Remember how creepy and cool that guy was and how his arrival at the end of a first-season episode would make the hair stand up on the back of your neck? Well, in his place, we now have drunken frat guys. Ho-hum.
Lastly, regarding the stand-alone episodes, when the CW shortened season three from 24 episodes to 22, Rob and company decided to ditch the planned third story arc and do four self-contained episodes at the end of the year. Sounds like a test run in case the CW orders a season four. What's depressing is arc three was to heavily involve Mac and Wallace. Sigh ...
[ edited by bobtaylor on 2007-01-31 15:59 ]
rbt | January 31, 17:41 CET
I understand those who may get tired of the LoVe ship stuff, but IMO, by this point, the two characters will be forever linked through so much shared experience. Logan's relative importance in Veronica's life will probably always have its highs and lows, but will never go away. I think their connection is played well as a pretty real portrayal of two young adults with mountains of trust and honesty issues on their own, trying to overcome a bit of that to be truly intimate (as per last night's ep). Each of them will continue to make mistakes that inadvertantly hurt each other, but the mutual attraction and deep-seated feelings will remain, so they will always be drawn back together in some way. Not to mention, the on screen chemistry between Jason and Kristen is undeniable.
As for the rest of the seasonal arc stuff, I really enjoyed the nine-episode campus rape mystery. The closer to that, "Spit & Eggs", was one of the best episodes of television anywhere this season. I'm looking forward to where the Cyrus O'Dell arc goes, too. Like many others, the "stand alone" type episodes have me more than anxious and worried, but I have enough confidence in Rob Thomas - at times as smart, witty and snarky a writer as Joss, IMO - to at least support the show and give it a chance. He will keep the characters' own personal arcs relevant and continuity-driven, even without long-reaching big plots.
Even at the show's worst, Veronica Mars is better than most other stuff on TV. The cast has chemistry in spades, with the chops to handle the fast-pace of the dialogue, and I for one hope that there is still a chance for a fourth season. The ratings - while never stellar, have averaged higher numbers than in either S1 or S2 (so far), and two of the three highest rated eps of the series have been this season, I believe. And if I'm not mistake, of all shows on The CW, VM is one of only two or three who's ratings have actually increased from the last season to this one.
The way I see it, regardless of any current/former watcher's frustrations with this season, for the sake of quality television in general, VM needs to be allowed to stick around for as long as Rob Thomas has stories to tell. For every scripted show that goes down, the wretched American Idol or Dancing with the Stars get a bump, and more mindless crap like Wife-Swap or game shows like Deal or No Deal pop up. And that just pains me more than I can say.
Lastly, a big "welcome!" to Michael Muhney. Awesome to see him around here, after all of his Joss-praise. I know Lamb as a character has gotten a lot of the supporting-character shaft from the budget and story constraints this season - like Mac and Wallace - but he still makes all of his screen minutes memorable.
clarkkent179 | January 31, 18:17 CET
I agree on all above points. Even though season three has disappointed, I'd still rather watch Veronica than any of that reality nonsense or even ... uh ... Smallville.
:)
rbt | January 31, 18:29 CET
I have to agree that although the third season of VM may not be as strong as the first two, it's still one of the most compelling shows on tv. It's the only show where I don't see the ending coming from a mile away, and I absolutely love that.
El Diablo Robotico | January 31, 18:33 CET
I love this show. This show is probably the only "appointment television" show that I have left. This is the only show that in some way challenges me. Is the tone of this season different? Indeed. But I think "Veronica Mars" has struggled to find its niche in TV Land. Why is this show only pulling in 3 million viewers on a good day? I really don't understand. Because of that, I think they're fighting to do something... anything... to get the ratings up. I mean, let's face it, folks... it really is all about the ratings. Ratings = Money. Money makes the world go round.
Arista | January 31, 19:07 CET
Word to the ratings thing. Sadly, the Nielsen system is more often than not the bane of quality television. The masses won't stay tuned in to detailed stories that take a while to unfold. Hence the drop-off for Lost this season, too.
Rob Thomas is trying to force a compromise into the format of the show that can keep the audience (or increase it just a smidge) while still maintaining the best parts of what makes the show unique. I don't envy his creative task, but do appreciate the work being put in to keep the show around. If VM gets axed this year, I'll be more than upset for a quite a while.
clarkkent179 | January 31, 19:22 CET
Simon | January 31, 20:56 CET
rbt | January 31, 21:12 CET
My watching of VM, like everything else, has been spotty. It is just so hard to make sure I am seated in fromt of a TV at a certain hour on the correct week to get the next episode. That said, I still like it and would enjoy filling in the blanks.
Of course SMG would be wonderful to have on VM. I expected everybody on this thread to be saying "well duh." ...Not to Kristen Bell's answer, just to the question...and not to the interviewer for asking the question, because sometimes questions are asked for other reasons than wanting an unexpected answer. (Did I get myself out of that one?)
SMG and Kristen Bell would be interesting together...half-sisters keeps coming to mind for some reason. (And while I am at it, I want to cast the guy on 6 Feet Under, who is not playing Dexter, as Nathan Fillion's brother...on something.)
Michael Muhney I'm glad you got your membership set-up for Whedonesque and are using it. Welcome aboard. I also hope we see more of you in VM as the season progresses.
newcj | January 31, 22:07 CET
I thought there was something - it never looked to me like he had a weight issue per se. I thought he looked swollen, like he was heavily allergic or something like that. I'm just used to the look of that, having grown up around some people deeply allergic to many things, and consequently puffy.
Or I'm completely wrong and a crappy armchair physician, with absolutely no experience or license to "long-distance" diagnose. Well, I am that, in fact, but I still may be accidentally right...
(And thanks a bunch, Mythtaken, you have exposed my deeply-held secret. I am a machine - an early and fairly unsuccessful attempt at A.I. The only part they got even sorta right was the quoting function...)
[ edited by QuoterGal on 2007-02-01 00:13 ]
QuoterGal | January 31, 22:43 CET
Seriously, can you think of another network series that's gone through what Veronica has? Let's see, we've got: Constant rumors of cancellation, two last-minute renewals, forced Paris Hilton hirings, forced America's Next Top Model hirings, budget crises, cast members getting sick, cast members getting shafted, a switch to a whole new network, love letters from Joss Whedon and Stephen King, plotting that even the show's creator admits is sometimes too confusing, a reduced season order, tinkerings to the very structure of the show. What else am I missing?
Don't get me wrong. The brilliance of season one makes the whole thing worthwhile (at least from one fan's perspective). But jeez!
rbt | January 31, 22:51 CET
Seriously, can you think of another network series that's gone through what Veronica has?
Angel had its moments.
Simon | January 31, 23:20 CET
Too true, Simon. A little more spread out, though.
rbt | January 31, 23:22 CET
But even before the esteemed MM joined our exaulted ranks, I've been saying we needed more Sheriff Lamb. I want to know his back story and I want to see him and Veronica interact.
Lioness | January 31, 23:45 CET
I also think people are right that Duncan and Logan's own stories have ended, and something that might bring back some of the show's intensity is bringing in new regular characters that have some of the same depth and backstory that those guys had. I mean Piz - c'mon, a cute guy with a crush on Veronica that's going nowhere. Who cares? And Mack's room-mate is a total nonentity - she got raped and even that didn't make her even remotely a compelling character.
That said, I don't think Logan needs to go, because when he and Veronica are together they bring in some of the most entertaining moments of the show. Just in last night's episode, which I thought was the best one of the season, the whole "As long as we're paying..." routine was great vintage Logan. And the way he played her about the "have you ever" question. Back in the beginning of the season, the Clint Eastwood bit. Logan's "That's Admiral Moneybags to you" line, with the bellboy. I think if Veronica and Logan were allowed to just be together without the breakup of the week routine, they have a great potential for a kind of Nick and Nora Charles style relationship that can bring in a lot of wit and still have room for the occasionall deep angsty chewy moments.
barboo | February 01, 00:37 CET
Nikki Stafford | February 01, 00:39 CET
Welcome to whedonesque, Michael Muhney. I just want to say right off that Sheriff Lamb is one of my favorite supporting characters EVER, and your buddy act with Rico Colantoni in "Silence of the Lamb" (ep 1.11) made me think: "If these guys weren't already on a kickass TV series...this would be a kickass TV series."
But, much as I was glad to see him post here, MM's post almost broke my heart. He obviously loves this series as much (if not more) than we do, and apparently, there's behind-the-scenes turmoil that would crush the spirit of an avid VM fan. It's not what I would call "encouraging."
Sigh. I'm going to enjoy VM for as long as it's on. I loved "Spit and Eggs" and "Show Me the Monkey" and I've got "Poughkeepsie, Tramps and Thieves" lined up on tape. Bring it on....
cjl | February 01, 01:39 CET
And now back to my what-the-hell-with-VM-S3? random thoughts rant. ;-)
I completely agree that 2 rape stories in 3 seasons is not great storytelling. In last week's ep, when Mac and VM and their new roommate (who is SO non-interesting that I can't even remember her character's name!) were preparing for the party, I remember thinking how sad it was that here were 3 characters who were all raped. Ewww. Why not spend more time focusing on Mac's and VM's recoveries (since in the S2 finale VM discovered that she had been abused just as Mac had, even though she had previously thought that it was all "OK")? Throwing in more victimizing just lessened the impact of their experiences, which we really should care very deeply about. Also, it kept seeming strange to me that VM was continually reluctant to get involved in finding the rapist; I would have thought her personal experiences would make her an unstoppable revenge-seeking machine, relentless in wanting to stop the rapes. That would have been an interesting storyline -- Keith, Logan, Wallace and others telling her that she was going overboard, losing sleep, blowing off her classes, taking risks or being overly angry, intimidating (using taser, Backup, etc.) or even being a vigilante to try to get rid of the guy. I could have seen her becoming obsessed, like Johnny in the late seasons of Dead Zone becoming obsessed over stopping the politician who's going to cause the nuclear apocalypse. But seeing her getting blackmailed into looking for the rapist by a number of different people, including the frat boys? Didn't fit the VM I knew in S1 and S2.
I do like VM and Logan together, but not like it's been this season. What made that couple work was the mutual bond of smart, cynical, snarkiness, which is a cover for a lot of emotional need inside (and also hot sex, let's face it). A breakup a week does not make interesting TV, IMO; even a cynical person can have a relationship where they trust their partner most of the time. Snarky banter, yes (remember when we heard things like VM to DK: "You're just here for your looks. Leave the heavy thinking to me, Sugar-Pants."?); constant suspicion and being proven wrong, no -- because, for another thing, VM is supposed to be a good detective; with all her suspicions of Logan being wrong, she's starting to look stupid, which would be death for who she is as a character. And, tell the truth, I'm trying to pull my grades up this semester, so -- I taped last night's ep and haven't watched it yet! I'll get right on it, yo! :-(
And since they took all the time to send the characters we knew to college with VM, why not use them? I agree, where have Wallace and Mac and Lamb gone, for the most part? About the only time I saw Wallace was in the prison experiment ep (which I agree was one of the best of this season) and the study-harder-don't-cheat ep. And where are the sleazy lawyer friend Keith uses, and Vinny the other detective in town? Not enough of them, too much of the new (not interesting) people. The criminology professor might be interesting, and I really liked O'Dell, but he's gone now. Piz could be a Riley, but he'd better start representin' (and, again, I haven't seen last night's ep yet, maybe he did represent!). I really liked where they were going with Weevil and O'Dell, and I am so sorry to hear from "a very nice person" that Mr. Capra was ill; I really hope he is doing better now!
Keith's affair. Ewww. That was a difficult thing to take. It's true that people's flaws are interesting and dramatic, but it's also true that Keith was the moral compass of the show. Also, it really felt like a "stunt" to me because his partner in the affair was Maya from Just Shoot Me! I kind of thought that first night, when Keith was struggling and struggling with the decision and finally just was sort of overwhelmed by need, made sense -- drama, human failings, desire, need for love, guilt, etc. -- but I would have had him break it off immediately after and continue to deal with the guilt feelings about it. (This paragraph brought to you by the word "guilt".) And lots and lots of tension and fight between Keith and Veronica about it, which would be amazing drama, since the close ties between those 2 are the center of the series, IMO.
OK, shutting off computer now and starting
the VCR to watch last night's ephomeworkhealthful, refreshing sleep. ;-)billz | February 01, 13:03 CET
I'm more saddened and surprised that my fellow Whedonesquers haven't spent their time wisely coming up with VM meets SMG story lines. Shame on us all! The bitchin' about season 3 is a sure sign we need to lighten up. To heck with the Valentine Story thing, let's ramp up some VM vs SMG Penthouse Forum fodder. So, as Jackie Gleason said, Away we go:
The set up, one of Veroncia's close personal friends (Sheriff Lamb? Ha, ha, MM only kidding) dies in a tradgic mud wrestling accident hosted by creepy Republician guys. Or was it an accident? Ronnie wants to go undercover. Mac tearfully tries to talk her out of it. Wallace will support anything she wants to do. Then it's 80's movie training montage time with Weevil as coach and Aaron as sparing partner. Keith looks somberly on, gravely concerned. Sheriff Lamb is in his bunk. Finally the big night. Ronnie enters the mud wrestling ring in a biniki that leaves nothing to the imagination. Mostly because mine is so weak by this point (the whole blood draining to another part of my body thing). Ronnie triumphs over the first 2 foes! Here I'm thinking doe eyed Wonder Woman what-a-be's. Then, S-M-G! wearing naught but pasties and a thong!
Never mind about the rest of the ep. I'll be in my bunk.
RazorBlade | February 01, 16:19 CET
And well, I really hate the standalones (they're funny and good writted, but they're not the same as a bigger and longer story arc).
And I really hate Rob's decision to make all of the remain episodes as standalones. To me, it looks like he run out of ideas (he should see "Brick", an excellent vero-esque movie).
[ edited by Angel TheVampire on 2007-02-01 20:54 ]
Angel TheVampire | February 01, 22:49 CET