TV: Catching up with the Buffy cast (Part 1).
A nice little two-part article that highlights what some of the Buffy alums have been up to since the show ended (project-wise).
Sorry if this is a repeat. I just found it and I don't remember seeing it here.
February 08 2007
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Simpleba | February 08, 02:20 CET
Um, I think it's kind of funny he makes it so you have to know his last name to send a friend request to him. As if that's so hard to figure out! ;)
fortunateizzi | February 08, 02:36 CET
I don't think that's necessarily true, Mike (writer of the blog). Suburban Girl (her most recent film) isn't horror. Also, you have to look at economics from an actor's point of view. Certainly Sarah wants to keep working steadily and probably takes projects offered that are of high enough quality to interest her. Also, she just doesn't seem like the kind of person to give up and resign herself to anything, although I can see how it could appear to someone on the outside looking in that she isn't exactly networking with say, Martin Scorsese's people to get cast in a top feature film (roles she is certainly able to do).
Is there a Buffy stigma? Do top directors look at Sarah and think, "Oh, the Buffy the Vampire Slayer girl" ? If they can't see her obvious talent from that show and films she's made, something is seriously wrong someplace.
Tonya J | February 08, 03:26 CET
Loved the Trudy clip!
Love's Bitch | February 08, 03:46 CET
RavenU | February 08, 03:48 CET
slayer_ofbunnies | February 08, 04:18 CET
Tonya J | February 08, 05:32 CET
cheryl | February 08, 05:47 CET
Chris inVirginia | February 08, 06:34 CET
but I hate her.
Remember the Buffy wrap party? That wacky thing the cast, crew, and staff throw to celebrate the culmination of a TV show? Sarah never showed. Check the pictures. http://www.slayage.com/news/030421-wrappartypics.html
She's never in the Buffy DVD commentary; too busy doing Scooby Doo 4.
Joss describes James Marsters (whose character I dislike) as 'a joy to work with,' and the only thing I've ever heard him call Sarah (whose character I adore) is 'professional.'
I'm pretty sure 'professional' is industry slang for 'heinous bitch.'
Alex2459 | February 08, 09:24 CET
Yay. Name calling. Always a sure sign of great conversation. There's always one in the crowd, I guess.
syd | February 08, 10:17 CET
Simon | February 08, 11:25 CET
So until Tom Lenk starts giving Capital Hill pages dance lessons, Make Mine Marvel!
RazorBlade | February 08, 13:49 CET
I would like to comment on the zero tolerance given to actor bashing around here, as demonstrated by Simon above, which I think is an essential part of why I bother posting around here.
Everyone has an opinion about a given subject and everyone has that right, of course. What that opinion often lacks is information, especially when you are discussing the life and choices of another individual and even more especially when that individual is not a close family member or friend of yours. The way that the celebrity world works today and the way that the media gives us an almost minute by minute account of their lives means that we sometimes get the mistaken impression that we know these people and have enough information to judge them.
What needs to be realised is that we really get only the surface of any given celeb's life. The few facts and details that they choose to give or that the intrusive media likes to dig up for us. If you then allow yourself to believe that you can accurately judge a person by that small, and often biased, amount of information then you are doing both yourself and that person a great disservice and giving the media a lot more credit than it is due. Personally I think this is a mistake. Which is why I don't read the tabloids or the celeb mags.
So whilst there is nothing wrong with having an opinion, I tend to think that you should balance that right with the need to make certain that your opinion is truly valid and based on fact. Until everyone is able to do that then I think that the Whedonesque policy for bashing actors is not only the right thing but actually essential. It's a pity that more online forums and message boards don't enforce the same.
Demon-X | February 08, 16:02 CET
Mythtaken | February 08, 17:49 CET
Mayhem | February 08, 17:53 CET
Ocular | February 08, 18:23 CET
[ edited by witchlover on 2007-02-08 18:04 ]
witchlover | February 08, 19:06 CET
Now if we can all get back to the original topic in hand that'd be super. Cheers.
Simon | February 08, 19:21 CET
Add me to the list of those who would like to see "Bandwagon" in one form or another.
bloodflowers | February 08, 19:24 CET
In other news: I'm with Roxtar...not physically...just in agreement with the opinion that it is always easy to judge other people, even though we rarely have enough information to judge the actions of those closest to us, much less anyone else who is just living their lives as best as they can.
That is one of the things I like about Joss's writing, his use of dramatic irony combined with humanity's tendency to judge others. Characters make judgements all the time based on their own perceptions. They usually do not have all of the information, but almost always think they do. They make mistakes and I think the idea is that the audience becomes more aware of the fact that they also need to be careful about makeing judgements about other people in real life.
newcj | February 08, 19:27 CET
jenofthejungle | February 08, 19:30 CET
witchlover | February 08, 20:06 CET
maje | February 08, 20:58 CET
And personally I don't care about the actors' private lives. As the character in the Stephen King story said; 'It is the tale and not he who tells it'
wouldestous | February 08, 21:07 CET
More seriously, I do get what you mean about actors' (and writers') private lives being their own business, and I agree completely.
In the Latin | February 08, 22:20 CET
Love's Bitch | February 09, 01:31 CET
As for rumors we've heard about any of the "Whedonvets" I can pretty much guarantee that on any show or movie you'll always find a certain portion of the crew and other staff who will make derogatory comments about one or more of the lead performers. Always. And even if it is true it doesn't affect me and it's none of my biz,even if I am for some reason interested in it.
DaddyCatALSO | February 09, 03:35 CET
I don't like her, and that's my opinion. Then again, I don't know her, so I shouldn't judge.
Alex2459 | February 09, 10:32 CET
Personally, I wasn't offended. As I said, I think you are allowed an opinion and should be free to state it at all times. I just also honestly wish more people would hold off on giving opinions on things that they don't have all the facts about. Especially when those opinions lead to a negative attitude. It's like what I hear all the time from some of my real life friends concerning various bands we discuss.
Me: So did you hear the new single from "insert band here"?
Them: Nah, don't like them. Too emo.
Me: But have you heard them play?
Them: Nah.
Me: So how do you know you don't like them?
Them: Well, Kerrang said they were emo.
Me: Okaaaaaay...
That attitude just drives me nuts! Have an opinion but at least back it up by getting some facts about the subject at hand. If you can't get those facts then try to keep an open mind. It's only fair. I think the only reason I responded to your post at all was because of the fact you stated that you "hate" Sarah, which is a strong feeling to have considering what you are basing it on.
Sorry, sermon over. How preachy does all that sound? My gran always says that she wishes that I'd become a priest. She forgets that part of the job description is having to believe in God, which is the point where I would have problems. :D
Demon-X | February 09, 14:48 CET