Vote Serenity for "Best Sci-Fi Ship".
Slashdot's weekly poll asks the age old question.
Other options are the Millenium Falcon, NCC-1701, TARDIS, Battlestar Galactica, Moya, NCC-1701-D, and the obligatory H.M.S. CowboyNeal.
Right now Serenity is trailing the Falcon by about 250 votes.
April 24 2007
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


embers | April 24, 19:47 CET
http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=1421
jam2 | April 24, 19:52 CET
Okay I voted twice. I had to vote for the Enterprise, too. Starfleet would have taken away my tricorder if I hadn't.
[ edited by kerfuffle on 2007-04-24 21:45 ]
kerfuffle | April 24, 19:53 CET
Sure, she looked like a junker, but anybody who knows drag racing knows the correct term for the Falcon is "sleeper", fastest ship on eithers side of the battle. Also, she's armed.
Most importantly--wookie co-pilot.
The_Joker | April 24, 19:55 CET
If it actually was "best" though, the old blue box has to take it. Sure she looks like a POS and is held together with bits of twine and The Doctor's will-power BUT she's still hundreds of years ahead of any of the other ships. And you can't beat time-travel as an optional extra, s'way better than a 10 disc CD changer ;).
It's cool to throw down in a poll we might actually lose too. I know /. isn't as mighty as it once was but i'd think they can still match us for both numbers and fervour.
(Serenity, much as I love her, would be something like fourth after the 1701-D - though the CowboyNeal was also a fine boat, if a bit slow on the turn ;)
Saje | April 24, 20:07 CET
DarenG | April 24, 20:12 CET
Maybe I'll vote again just for good measure ;).
Resolute | April 24, 20:16 CET
Rowan Hawthorn | April 24, 20:16 CET
But I wouldnt pick anything but Serenity.
mifeng | April 24, 20:23 CET
Simon | April 24, 20:24 CET
embers,
You did order a set of Serenity Blueprints from QMX, right? They are down to the last 100 or so.
Serenity Sequel, Sequel, set we can tour at Universal Studios and hold weddings and shindigs and Joss can film episode-like Firefly/Serenity movies.
That's why I've got my Serenity Blueprints...you know for when I win the lottery.
Anonymous1 | April 24, 20:46 CET
Hey, it was my first love as a child and I was pissed when it was cancelled.
Now, some 40 years later, I still get pissed when my favorite shows are cancelled. Hmm, starting to wonder if there's a pattern here?
Madhatter | April 24, 21:18 CET
Tonya J | April 24, 21:34 CET
Hex | April 24, 21:35 CET
kurya | April 24, 21:39 CET
The_Joker | April 24, 21:44 CET
Serenity has to be it for me, not because of my love for the show but because of her importance in the eyes of her crew, Mal who fell in love with her at first glance, Kaylee who could feel her moods, and the rest in other ways.
Moya would be a close second, she was a character in every way, her life was in risk a lot of the time, she suffered grate pains and even had a kid. She was also the only character on Farscape that all the other characters (even Rygel) loved.
The others are just ships. I like my car, but I won't cry if something happened to it. I don't think anyone would have cried for just a ship.
urkonn | April 24, 22:32 CET
I may have been a kid (and a big nerd) but I remember tearing up a bit when the Enterprise was destroyed. Heck, it was almost as bad as Spock dying.
As much as Mal loved his ship, I think Kirk loved his more.
kerfuffle | April 24, 22:42 CET
I can picture Serenity in my mind, I know her parts. In those few episodes of Firefly and Serenity, we know more about Serenity than we do about the Enterprise, for example. I've seen way more episodes of Star Trek than Firefly and everything feels disconnected when I try to think of any of the Trek vessels. The Enterprise is all Phase-fluxers, dylithium crystals, and midichloreans to me.
Also, Serenity is more than a just a ship to the crew. Several references are made to this. I've never seen Dr. Who, and only 10 episodes of Farscape, so I can't really speak for those ships, but the Falcon would be the closest ship to Serenity in this regard.
Now, if I had voted based on features, one of the Trek ships would have won, though I don't know which is which (thus saving my reputation for being cool).
Caleb | April 24, 22:53 CET
Madhatter | April 24, 22:58 CET
zeitgeist | April 24, 22:59 CET
What a great list, but virtually impossible,for me, to choose which ship to vote for.
Shade of Pale | April 24, 23:02 CET
Don't forget the tribbles.
I can see your point of view. It's weird but I have the total opposite reaction. I didn't have the same kind of connection with Serenity that I did with the Enterprise. Of course, I'm talking about the Enterprise in the orginal series. The new versions of the ship weren't quite the same. Maybe if Serenity would have had some swooshy doors and some groovy sixties lighting and decor...
Plus, phasers = cool.
Question: What are midichloreans?
[ edited by kerfuffle on 2007-04-24 20:09 ]
kerfuffle | April 24, 23:02 CET
Yeah, then I'd have to say the Enterprise, just make sure you're not one of the crew members that Kirk asks to go down to the surface with him and you'd do fine. If you're a secondary character on Serenity, you really don't have a chance, plus being on the run really isn't me.
We can agree on this! I think TOS had a less sterile feel to it than TNG, though I'd have to watch some episodes side by side to pinpoint why. I really liked TOS, though for some reason the ship isn't that interesting to me. Maybe it's because I've only seen the second movie...
Caleb | April 24, 23:15 CET
Oh, that's easy. Serenity. That captain and that Jayne fellow are both smokin hot. Plus everyone curses like crazy.
I agree with you Caleb. Avoid going to the surface with Kirk. If they issue a red shirt, run.
kerfuffle | April 24, 23:24 CET
Lady Brick | April 24, 23:45 CET
embers | April 24, 23:49 CET
Aside from spelled incorrectly? ba-da-da! They are actually George Lucas' "scientific explanation" for people wielding Force Powers in Star Wars. So, why is it listed in a sentence about Star Trek -- I dunno.
zeitgeist | April 25, 00:00 CET
kerfuffle | April 25, 00:04 CET
Madhatter | April 25, 00:20 CET
Does anybody remember that little online game where you had to pick the Chinese symbols? And if you got it wrong Serenity blew up? Yeah. That was traumatizing.
[ edited by UnpluggedCrazy on 2007-04-24 21:42 ]
UnpluggedCrazy | April 25, 00:42 CET
Just trying to be funny. I didn't remember them being mentioned in any of the movies, though according to the wiki page they were mentioned in episode 1. Now I have to forget that piece of information again!
Caleb | April 25, 00:49 CET
Now, if we're talking which crew we like the best, that's a different story. (Trying to picture the Serenity crew on the TARDIS... No, that's not working.)
jcs | April 25, 00:52 CET
Dude, are you trying to say the Force is not strong with the Enterprise ? Red-shirts, attack ! I'll, err, just be back here
hiding in safetywaiting for the best moment to join you ;).Caleb, the TARDIS (I think canonically) actually enters into a sort of symbiotic relationship with The Doctor (and in the 10th Doctor's case is basically the one thing he has left of his home planet). It's certainly way more than 'just a ship'. In some incarnations it's even presented as being semi-sentient.
Re: The Enterprise, Picard wasn't that sentimental about it but La Forge sure was (and even moreso Scotty in TOS). And with Kirk i'm reminded of (I think) the end of Star Trek III where he's destroyed the 1701 ("no bloody As, Bs, Cs or Ds" ;) and says to Bones something like "My God Bones, what have I done ?". Pretty sure it was his first command as well so I think he'd be pretty attached. I know what you mean about the 1701-D though, lovely ship but just a bit too clean. And everyone playing the Cello and writing/producing their own stage productions and so on would get up my nose after a while. Does anyone ever just lounge around in their pajamas playing 24th century X-box and getting pissed on Brandy liquers ? I mean, just chill every now and again, y'know ?
(BTW, since the poll just says "Favourite Sci-fi ship" I went purely on the ship itself, not the crew or the universe it was set in etc. That stuff could affect my choice a fair bit)
Saje | April 25, 00:53 CET
Sentient ship w/ time traveling capabilities + River w/ crazy = dunwannathinkaboutit
Lady Brick | April 25, 00:56 CET
I mean, being landed on by a pinch in the space-time continuum has to hurt right ? Then there's the teenage psychic ninja fists ...
Saje | April 25, 01:08 CET
[ edited by kurya on 2007-04-24 22:11 ]
kurya | April 25, 01:10 CET
The Voyage Home. Best Star Trek Movie...ever.
Does anyone ever just lounge around in their pajamas playing 24th century X-box and getting pissed on Brandy liquers?
Pity, they never did.
kerfuffle | April 25, 01:21 CET
It's no surprise that Serenity feels more personal since that was one of Joss's goals with Firefly. I mean, Serenity has a real dining area, with a wooden table, where people eat real food. Star Trek's vision was completely different. Star Trek, like the Alliance in Firefly, focused on the well being of civilization as a whole at the expense of personal liberty. The difference being that in Serenity, the Alliance was the antagonist.
I am biased by all of these things, since I myself would not enjoy living in a society like Star Trek's, so that also explains my vote.
I think the closest they get is when they play in the holodeck. So while you and I may play Sherlock Holmes on the Xbox, they play it in a "simulated relatity" chamber. I don't think they allow drinks in the holodeck either, so that's right out.
I just thought of another ship, though it doesn't really fit my own criteria for "best sci-fi ship", but what about the Heart of Gold? Infinite Improbability Drive!
Caleb | April 25, 01:28 CET
napua | April 25, 01:33 CET
embers | April 25, 01:34 CET
TARDIS + hallucinogenic drugs > Infinite Improbability Drive
(Please note that I do not support the use of recreational drugs, especially by time travelers.)
[ edited by Lady Brick on 2007-04-24 22:45 ]
Lady Brick | April 25, 01:35 CET
Madhatter | April 25, 01:39 CET
By the way, in reality I checked my "cool" card a long time ago, at a door far, far away.
So, with that in mind, where would I start watching Dr. Who? There seems to be a lot of love for it here, so I should probably give it a shot. Should I start with the vintage series, or is there a better place?
Caleb | April 25, 01:43 CET
kerfuffle | April 25, 01:47 CET
Lady Brick | April 25, 01:50 CET
kurya | April 25, 02:04 CET
As much as I love Doctor Who, I always had problems seeing the Tardis as a real "ship". It just seems like it belongs in a different category altogether I guess.
This time I gave my vote to Serenity because it seems like more than a ship. It's a well lived and loved home.
SenseiJJ | April 25, 04:08 CET
Serenity
The TARDIS
Millenium Falcon
Moya
Galactica
The Enterprises
CowboyNeal
White Knight | April 25, 05:04 CET
The various Enterprises were all great in their own ways, but they were all way too big. They were all massive fleet ships that would require hundreds, maybe thousands of crew to man them. Of the Star Trek ships I actually kind of have a soft spot for the Voyager (the ship, not the show). But she ain't an option.
Moya was pretty cool, but I only ever got to see the first season of Farscape, so I don't think I ended up bonding with her and her crew the way many fans did. Maybe once I eventually watch the whole thing she'll move up in my estimation, but not at the moment.
And even the Galactica made a run at my vote. But she's kind of in the same category as the Enterprise -- too big for lil' me.
And I'm just not familiar enough with any of the others (don't even know what the hell the CowboyNeal is.)
So Serenity takes it for me. It's small, and clunky, and homey... and real. Of course it doesn't hurt that I've gotten my Serenity blueprints to pour over for hours on end. Gorgeous!
Haunt | April 25, 06:07 CET
Loved Firefly, but sorry, serenity was crap (as was the movie) so thumbs down.
Pumps | April 25, 15:35 CET
Sabri3l | April 25, 16:25 CET
-1, Troll ;-).
Saje | April 25, 16:38 CET
[ edited by Noclaf on 2007-04-26 01:21 ]
Noclaf | April 26, 04:19 CET