Firefly/Serenity Ranked 15th Best in Sci-Fi Countdown.
Entertainment Weekly ranks the best in science fiction in the last twenty five years.
"Saddle up for the show, to see how it all started, and the movie, to see the ending. Then pray that someday, some studio exec will have the guts to make more." —Jeff Jensen
May 04 2007
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


ChromeShark | May 04, 14:38 CET
gossi | May 04, 14:54 CET
If you read the Star Wars: Clone Wars entry it mentions it's their top 25 of the last 25 years, which excludes a fair few of the 'automatic' choices most people would expect.
Personally I can't believe anyone would rate Heroes as being in the top 25. It's a good show, but come on! Even BSG at #2 is a weird one for me.
Grounded | May 04, 14:54 CET
Simon | May 04, 15:20 CET
Firefly was strange. Firefly shouldn't have worked. And it didn't. Firefly was canceled after 11 episodes...
Oh, it worked, it worked just fine.
Chris inVirginia | May 04, 15:22 CET
It's an idiosyncratic list as they all are. Personally, though i'm fonder of Next Gen i'd probably say DS9 was actually the better series. And i'd've put Babylon 5 on there too Simon. Also, I liked Christopher Eccleston a lot but better than Big Tam ? Blasphemy. And 'Wrath of Khan' is definitely my favourite Star Trek film. Except for the days when it's 'Undiscovered Country' ;).
I can see 'The Matrix' as number one, certainly from the last 25 years. Probably wouldn't be my choice but it's not insane. 'Matrix Revolutions', that'd be insane. And I have to say, though it's very early to have 'Heroes' on this kind of list, I think just on the basis of what they've done so far it should probably be up there (and if they don't screw the season finale up it definitely should).
Saje | May 04, 15:46 CET
I liked Christopher Eccleston a lot as well, but I like David Tennant just a bit better.
And where, oh where has my beloved Dark City gone?
Lady Brick | May 04, 16:18 CET
ETA - DS9 definitely the better (best!) Trek, IMO. Children of Men, while I enjoyed it, I don't think belongs so high on the list.
zeitgeist | May 04, 16:36 CET
But what exactly have they done so far? It's all been very enjoyable, but it hasn't really broken any new ground as yet.
Grounded | May 04, 16:39 CET
zeitgeist | May 04, 16:44 CET
True, but it's the way they do it. Basically, a lot of shows make me smile, some make me laugh but very, very few make me clap my hands in childish glee. 'Heroes' does. Everyone's mileage will vary though ;).
And where, oh where has my beloved Dark City gone?
Well, since they've got 'The Matrix' on there Lady Brick, they probably thought they already had one instance of the class 'Dark City'. Ooh, controversial ;).
Agreed zeitgeist, I think this season may miss Moffat quite a bit. And also on the shoutiness, as I said on the .org, really big dogs don't need to bark because you believe them when they growl. And in his own way The Doctor is the biggest dog of all and should be played that way IMO.
Saje | May 04, 16:47 CET
With you 100% on the Steven Moffat love. "The Girl in the Fireplace" made me cry more than "Doomsday" Really looking forward to his episode this series, as well as Paul Cornell's two-parter.
Grounded: Heroes established a series of mysteries and are actually in the process of providing answers. That's more than a lot of other shows *cough*Lost*cough* have done.
I don't think the show has been perfect by any means, but the most recent episodes have been absolutely amazing. And as the season draws to a close, it's becoming more and more obvious just how well they've woven all these threads together. Seemingly-unimportant details from earlier episodes are suddenly being given new relevance/center stage in the story.
Overall, the plotting of the season has been top-notch and has a level of detail that reminds me a bit of the intricacy of the Harry Potter novels. And considering that Heroes has time travel and multiple timelines, that makes it all the more impressive. I can't think of another show that has pulled off something like this so successfully.
Saje: Oh, if that's the issue, then just swap The Matrix for Dark City, since it's the better movie of the two anyway ;)
[ edited by Lady Brick on 2007-05-04 16:59 ]
[ edited by Lady Brick on 2007-05-04 17:01 ]
Lady Brick | May 04, 16:55 CET
Geekiest sentence ever.
Mostly agree with this list. The first Matrix has never ceased to entertain me in probably dozens of viewings. I wish they'd given Firely more props than "surprise success on DVD," though. "Reinventing the genre," perhaps?
jkalderash | May 04, 17:05 CET
Also: if they can list Terminator and Terminator 2 together, I say Next Generation and Deep Space Nine can share billing, because I love DS9. Holds up better to multiple viewing, I think.
kishi | May 04, 17:24 CET
Passion | May 04, 17:28 CET
zeitgeist | May 04, 17:38 CET
And I agree with Serenifly being on this list, but I surely would've placed it higher than E.T., Lost, and ewww, Matrix. Not at number one (don't make me pick a number one, because I'll have to think), but certainly in the top ten. Firefly alone deserves a higher rank, but I'm pleased to see it recognized.
Dizzy | May 04, 17:45 CET
As I understand it, a different group of Heroes and a new intricately plotted bunch of eps.
zeitgeist | May 04, 17:48 CET
Gattaca is another movie I just thought of that I'm a bit surprised wasn't on the list. I'd perhaps swap it for Children of Men. Thought that was a pretty good movie, but not quite the sum of its parts.
Lady Brick | May 04, 17:55 CET
Personally I prefer the more patient approach Lost has taken (though obviously there have been frustating moments!) and I find it hard to swallow that anyone would claim Heroes has more layers/depth. A huge number of Heroes 'plot twists' so far have involved adding another character with a new power (or in some cases piling multiple powers up on the same character!), which, while making for some very cool moments, is ultimately unsatisfying to me. It's a lot easier to write in a world where you can drop in an invisible man whenever the plot requires it ;) And while Hiro is undoubtedly one of the coolest small-screen characters of recent times, his time-jumping escapades have been a continuity nightmare!
Of course I don't mean to annoy Heroes fans with the above - I guess I just feel the same way about Heroes that non-Firefly fans do when we're all raving about the show ;)
Grounded | May 04, 18:33 CET
Heroes isn't really any different in basic plot than the X-men, when you think about it.
The_Joker | May 04, 19:13 CET
Oh, fantastic ! I'd got the idea from somewhere (I think it was mooted last year) that Moffat wouldn't be doing one this series. Rarely been happier to be wrong ;). And Cornell can also write. Feeling better about this series' prospects now.
(and yep, 'Girl in the Fireplace' had me utterly hooked from the teaser and never let go. As she bent down to ask for help, we all knew who she was going to ask for - he's the magic man after all ;) - but the hairs were still standing up as she said it. A great story which really captured the romance of the whole concept and such a solid emotional core)
And 'Far Beyond the Stars' ? Just brilliant television. Moving and important. "You are the dreamer and the dream", indeed.
(incidentally, there are memos about the various authors' stories stuck up all over the magazine office in that episode and, according to the DS9 companion, one of the one's addressed to Armin Shimerman's character said "No-one will believe a cheerleader can kill vampires" ;)
Saje | May 04, 20:14 CET
On the other hand, the more Heroes progresses, the more it becomes clear how everything ties together. Unlike Lost, where I've questioned if anyone knows what's actually going on, everything in Heroes is very deliberate. This has had some drawbacks (the lackluster pacing of parts of Hiro's storyline, for example, obviously keeping him from getting too far ahead of everyone else), but the results have been more satisfying.
It's actually the same reason that I've thought that Firefly had the best start of any Joss TV series. It nailed what it was and how the characters fit together from the start, whereas BtVS and especially AtS felt around for a bit before really hitting their stride. Though admittedly, this wasn't at all clear to me seeing "The Train Job" as the pilot... I didn't think the series was nearly that strong until I finally saw the actual pilot.
Like I said, though, I'm waiting until at least the end of season 1 of Heroes and probably into season 2 before I'll actually say that I think it's BETTER than Lost.
Saje: Moffat wrote episode 3.10 and Cornell wrote 3.08 and 3.09. I'm a little concerned about 3.07 though... It's by the lead writer of Torchwood. I mean, I barely survived the horror of "Cyberwoman".
Lady Brick | May 04, 21:31 CET
zeitgeist | May 04, 22:00 CET
But whatever, everyone's got their own stupid opinion.
Resolute | May 04, 22:04 CET
kazzmere | May 04, 22:05 CET
That said, I did enjoy "Out of Time" and will probably give the second series a chance.
Lady Brick | May 04, 22:23 CET
zeitgeist | May 04, 22:26 CET
Madhatter | May 04, 23:30 CET
Heroes isn't really built around a central mystery though, so I don't think it's fair to say it's doing what Lost *should* be doing. I read an interview with Kring in SFX magazine yesterday where he made a point of the fact that there is no central mystery, and that he'd had to repeatedly convince people that the 'evolutionary theory' was the real explanation for the Heroes' existence!
Grounded | May 05, 10:54 CET
The Matrix as Number One I can live with, I think that time has caused a lot of people to forget how incredibly ground breaking it was on so many levels. Up until Serenity came along, The Matrix was probably the film I'd re-watched more often that any other.
And can I just let out a huge YES!!! for Battlestar Galactia in the Number Two spot? I loved the quote "The dysfunctionaly awesome cast ....".You could just as easily apply that phrase to the cast of BtS, which is in my book, the highest praise in the universe.
Most of the rest I disagreed with, especially Lost and Heros. And most especially, since they left Babylon5 off the list. I do think that Brazil belongs on the list, but definitely not as high as #6.
But still .... Yay battlestar Galactia!!!
Shey | May 05, 13:01 CET
[ edited by Tonya J on 2007-05-06 06:04 ]
Tonya J | May 06, 05:52 CET
WE SAY How could we leave this, creator Joss Whedon's crowning pop culture achievement, off the list? Easy, because it's not science fiction. Buffy slays vampires. It's right there in the title. And these aren't bloodsuckers created by some loophole-inducing scientific experiment or plasma-borne virus. Buffy is a work of gothic fantasy, replete with demons and witches and mummies and werewolves and magically hot lesbians.
Wow. They took the words right out of my head -- then rewrote them and made them funnier.
The other entries in the top 5 were the Stargate franchise (nice try but IMO too uneven), Farscape, Babylon 5, and The Fifth Element. Pretty much what we said. :D (And the only one they admit that they might have messed up on was Babylon 5)
*not sure if allowed to print the full name here so didn't
cabri | June 02, 12:23 CET