'Weekend psychosis'.
Peter Bradshaw writes in the Guardian about how Hollywood studios' obsession with blockbusters and the opening weekend squeezes out smaller films. Serenity is mentioned as an example of the 'very decent films which get shouldered aside because their opening weekend figures have been poor'.
[ edited by Gag Halfrunt on 2007-05-10 12:22 ]
May 10 2007
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


And in the case of Spidey 3 for instance, the huge box office was much more a result of a) it's frikkin' Spidey ! b) a great trailer and c) 'Spider-man 2' being so good rather than anything to do with the third one since reviews were/are decidedly (and deservedly IMO) mixed - likewise, Pirates of the Caribbean 2. So, since opening box office generally has very little to do with the merits of the film, why emphasise it so much ? Seems like just the cinematic equivalent of TV network short-sightedness.
Saje | May 10, 16:43 CET
Of course, do I agree with it? No. Studios are becoming so risk adverse, it's being a cancer of the industry -- both movies AND tv.
In truth, it's very hard to launch a film now and not make money from it. Serenity will have made Universal money in total, yet people sight it as a flop. In my world, a movie which makes coin is not a flop. In the world of Hollywood, that's not the case.
gossi | May 10, 17:36 CET
Madhatter | May 10, 19:06 CET
[ edited by Madhatter on 2007-05-10 16:11 ]
Madhatter | May 10, 19:10 CET
(Added - I certainly meant 'recast' vis-a-vis change of perceptions, not with new actors in the familiar roles. I hope that is obvious to all.)
[ edited by napua on 2007-05-10 19:06 ]
napua | May 10, 20:07 CET
Madhatter | May 10, 20:50 CET
flakbait | May 10, 22:11 CET
The Guardian seems to have a bit of a thing for Whedon, don't they?
Resolute | May 11, 03:14 CET