Joss & Whedonesque mentioned in L.A. Times article on Lionsgate.
Article in the June 5, 2007 Los Angeles Times on the advertising practices of Lionsgate ("Hostel," "Saw") discusses the ad campaign for "Captivity" and Joss Whedon's response and directs readers to Whedonesque to read his full post. This paragraph is near the end of the article.
In case above link doesn't work, go to www.latimes.com, type "Lionsgate" into their search engine and click on the first entry that comes up.
June 06 2007
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Harridan | June 06, 13:24 CET
The mention is cool, but looks a lot like those meta-whedonesque reports we had in other occasions, whenever the boss-man (or would that be joss-man, nah that's weird) post something big.
Numfar PTB | June 06, 13:29 CET
Harridan | June 06, 13:31 CET
deepgirl187 | June 06, 15:34 CET
NickSeng | June 06, 16:06 CET
"But what about his severed-head poster? Why isn't it vulgar too? 'There's a way for Bijou to hold her head in her hand and do it elegantly instead of gratuitously,' he says. 'It's the flourish and technique brought to it that makes all the difference.' "
Oh, pul-leeez, pull the other one. Who's kidding themself?
Though, of course, for me, the main issue isn't so much one of tastefullness vs. vulgarity - but maybe that's one of the things he has to say to himself every day in order to swallow what he does for a living - if he still has any doubts.
"I can do this vulgarly, or I can do this tastefully, and with panache."
Try a live frog every morning..
QuoterGal | June 06, 23:17 CET
I have to say, though, that while I found the pic of Bijou with her head *very* disturbing, I also found it somewhat...graceful, for lack of a better word. The fact that those two impressions can coexist is interesting, I think. I would never dare speak for Joss, but I believe he would also see an aesthetic difference between the Hostel ad campaign and the Captivity one.
On an amusingly personal side note, Eli's comment about the boar meat version of the poster was that it looked like his mom's artwork (she's a rather well-known artist). With that I don't actually agree, but I imagine Cora was rather pleased.
[ edited by OzLady on 2007-06-06 22:29 ]
OzLady | June 07, 01:28 CET
Celina | June 07, 02:13 CET
I'm not a fan of the headless 'Hostel II' poster but I do kind of get what he's saying. To my mind there is a difference between a gruesome image presented crudely, solely to shock (or sell) and what you might call 'art which is also gruesome'. Context is everything.
(as a - non-gruesome ;) - example, I was reading the other day about 'Operation First Casualty', a theatre group of Iraq war veterans who re-enact aspects of that war on US city streets. Some of it might be disturbing, even irresponsible but it's certainly not being done just for the sake of it or for mere commerce)
Saje | June 07, 02:36 CET
ormaybemidgets | June 07, 07:16 CET