Whedonesque : Comments on 1372 : Buffy the movie.

This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

May 17 2003

Buffy the movie. With the show ending next week, is it time for a re-evaluation of the 1992 flick?

No.

Simon | BtVS | 17:44 CET | 9 comments total | tags:

And again, no.

whirligig | May 17, 17:49 CET

I second that. Or third it. Or, to be more precise, eight-hundred-and-ninety it. No.

alpen | May 17, 19:24 CET

There's a movie? Huh.

bogu_salias | May 17, 21:08 CET

There's a TV show??

(just kidding)

aftermac | May 17, 21:14 CET

No. Hold on. What about that great scene when, when ... erm ... on second thoughts ...

feelinglistless | May 18, 01:56 CET

must we?

The Lady Pele | May 18, 02:33 CET

That was my favourite movie when I was twelve!

Weekly | May 18, 05:10 CET

I actually think the movie's better than the show.

Invisible Green | May 18, 20:13 CET

I enjoyed the movie, but always thought that Kristy Swanson was more miscast than Donald Sutherland. The joke is that she's a little blonde Valley girl - Swanson is a big girl (NOT fat, I just mean she could probably kick my ass in real life) and she doesn't look anywhere near 16.

The character would have been better played at the time by Tori Spelling (can not believe I said that) or Molly Ringwald.

Cris | May 19, 16:39 CET

You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.

« Older A Tale of Two Shows. | 10 questions for Joss Whedon. (NYT... Newer »