This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Whedonesque - a community weblog about Joss Whedon
"Do you trust me?"
11982 members | you are not logged in | 22 October 2017




Tweet







August 01 2007

Give us more real women on TV. An article on positive women role-models, with a mention of Joss's work in the field. "Clearly this guy needs to write more TV shows." I heartily agree.

I don't think that anyone would disagree with the idea that Joss needs to write more for TV. But I can disagree with the "real=admirable" idea that I got from this. Ask me how!
Adding my voice to the lament. After BSG ends next year, there wont IMO be a single major female character on a single show, network or cable, that fits my "real woman" critera. That is, a character complete with strengths/weakness's/complexity/ambiguities and the whole range of what makes a charatcer, regardless of gender, three dimensional.
I can't imagine where a Buffy or Zoe would fit into today's increasingly retrograde depiction of women on TV.
But I can disagree with the "real=admirable" idea that I got from this. Ask me how!

Ulp *steals self* ... "How ?" ;).

I actually think TV doesn't fare too badly in most of the categories the author cites (female TV cops ? Bloody loads, as with Doctors etc.) though the author's issue seems not to be that female characters are missing from our screens but that the ones he/she likes are missing from that list. Which they're also allowed to say, obviously, it's an opinion piece.

I guess I don't think that real necessarily = admirable either, nor even, necessarily that interesting. I can take an element of soap in my procedurals for instance but I don't want to see all the character's personal problems, because, frankly, I can watch real life for that. The sort of 'real' that's actually the 'ring of truth' you get from a well drawn character is something else, you can create a very extreme, unreal character that still rings true because of writing and performance (House is my biggie here, in real life he'd have been struck off - and probably knocked out ;) - so many times it's untrue. Brennan from 'Bones' is probably his closest female equivalent - she's often naive about the world to an unbelievable extent for a woman - presumably - in her 30s but it usually rings true because of how she's written and played). Regarding real complexity, flaws and ambiguity, to be honest, men don't fare too well either - most TV shows create fairly generic male and female characters, it's what the networks seem to think sells best (or maybe just 'easiest').

(reminds me of an Ian Rankin book - he's one of the bestselling crime novelists in the UK - wherein he talks about policemen sometimes getting erections while reading rape case-files and them dealing with the guilt that ensues. Now that may well be a real trait of some policemen in their darkest moments, sure ain't admirable though)

edited for spelling and blatant sexism based on white male assumptions only considered when I noticed which site the blog was on ;)

[ edited by Saje on 2007-08-05 11:35 ]

This thread has been closed for new comments.


You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.



joss speaks back home back home back home back home back home