November 08 2007
Desperate Housewives Shutting Down.
Sorry Nathan.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

FaithsTruCalling | November 08, 01:12 CET
Also, this makes me laugh uncontrollably, because Hollywood is such a laughable entity sometimes.
He said he knows what it's like to be without work, since he once survived on $25,000 to $45,000 a year when he couldn't get a better-paying TV gig.
Boohoo, Marc Cherry lived off of a regular income. I know in LA that's really just pennies, but come on, what does that actually show about Hollywood? I get paid in that bracket!
CaffeinatedSquint | November 08, 01:12 CET
kerfuffle | November 08, 01:14 CET
TamaraC | November 08, 01:21 CET
CaffeinatedSquint | November 08, 01:26 CET
*twitch*
I support the writers in this whole thing, but come on now. Mr. Cherry needs to come back down to reality.
RaisedByMongrels | November 08, 01:32 CET
CaffeinatedSquint | November 08, 01:36 CET
moley75 | November 08, 01:36 CET
It's a shame that people are seeing quotes like that instead of ones like James Gunn made in a reply to a comment on his latest blog (currently on page 8):
[ edited by Lady Brick on 2007-11-07 22:40 ]
Lady Brick | November 08, 01:38 CET
CaffeinatedSquint | November 08, 01:39 CET
Nathanless T.V.
:P
kerfuffle | November 08, 01:40 CET
TamaraC | November 08, 01:42 CET
But judging from the responses of the blog, people still think that writers shouldn't be pitied because they don't have a real job, compared to fast-food work, waitressing or even digging ditches. Again, people, I dare you to write a screenplay, or even one-act play that other people would want to see.
25 to 45 thousand bucks a year is a good salary, but in mid-sized cities like maybe in Utah, Colorado or Iowa. Not in the media centers.
Once the nets overdose on reality shows, then the viewers will understand. It's not like the NFL, which tried to keep going with scab players when the star players went on strike.
Oh, and it robs us of Nathan Fillion on TV! He was supposed to be on Craig Ferguson tonight...and should be on Kimmel or Leno, too.
impalergeneral | November 08, 01:55 CET
deanna b | November 08, 01:55 CET
crossoverman | November 08, 02:05 CET
cymerin | November 08, 02:05 CET
hacksaway | November 08, 02:17 CET
impalergeneral | November 08, 02:32 CET
Hey, there is a good chance that most of my shows are going to suffer from shortened runs next year. I've gotta find a silver lining in all this for me somehow, okay! ;)
RockManic | November 08, 02:44 CET
And I fully recognize that writing is a real JOB. I'm a writer, I know. People trade you all sorts of crap for not being a doctor or a lawyer. My parents were supportive when I went into journalism, despite the fact that MOST journalists don't get paid incredibly well. I could've probably gone to law school but I didn't think I would like it.
ETA: I meant to specify that the problem I had was with the comment, not the reasons for the WGA strike. I fully support the writers' reasons for striking.
[ edited by CaffeinatedSquint on 2007-11-07 23:54 ]
CaffeinatedSquint | November 08, 02:52 CET
Here is the classic case, I just read about on another website: "The Office" fans might know that they won a Daytime Emmy for the webisodes about the accounting staff (the characters Kevin, Oscar and Angela). Well, did you know -- the writers of those webisodes were not paid!!!
In the words of Gob from "Arrested Development" -- "come on!"
Also, the writers of animated series and reality shows get no Writers Guild coverage, which means no health care plans and no pension fund eligibility. That issue is on the table, too, and I think that's important also.
*steps off soapbox* :)
swanland | November 08, 03:11 CET
I am 100% for the WGA strike, but that comment irks me. Yeah, try being in a family of three that have lived on far less than $25k some years.
UnpluggedCrazy | November 08, 03:21 CET
Steve Carell informed NBC he is unable to report to work because he is suffering from “enlarged balls.” Link, with a brilliant video you should all watch.
Jenna Fischer confirms the show is completely dead until the strike is over. The actors trailers have been cleared.
[ edited by gossi on 2007-11-08 00:26 ]
gossi | November 08, 03:22 CET
CaffeinatedSquint | November 08, 03:50 CET
Regardless of the misinformation I doubt if Nathan wants to be crossing the picket line to be on set.
embers | November 08, 04:18 CET
gossi | November 08, 04:20 CET
cabri | November 08, 04:34 CET
I think this the first time I can recall creators trying to get their own shows shut down by networks, instead of the other way around.
gossi | November 08, 04:38 CET
It appears that Summer's new show, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, will go ahead as planned. So far...
RockManic | November 08, 05:16 CET
kishi | November 08, 05:34 CET
impalergeneral | November 08, 05:44 CET
embers | November 08, 05:58 CET
I agree, also, and I make within that range. (Not Cherry's income!) Try supporting a family on that. You are basically doing without everything. You live to pay for your housing and there is no money left for anything else. PLUS, what he is talking about is GROSS income. The take-home on these incomes is much lower.
The cost of living in California is exhorbitant, much as it is in the northeastern US. Incomes like that mean you never go out for anything except work. If you own a car, it's a junker -and you better be able to do the repairs yourself, because it's always breaking down and you can't afford a mechanic. It means that some weeks you do without food or your phone and electricity is turned off. It means you may have to do without internet access, which is OK, because you can't afford a computer - which sucks if you make your living as a writer. Maybe you aren't immediately in a life-threatening situation, but a couple of weeks without income can get you evicted from your home. God forbid you should have a medical emergency.
If writers lose this strike, it also makes it harder for the rest of us to get anywhere on our own jobs. If they win, it establishes and confirms the right of workers to have a say in their working conditions, and to draw the line on allowing employers to further exploit them. Workers in all fields should have the right to say when enough is enough, and reap the rewards of their own hard work.
Yes, working for minimum wage sucks, and it is unfair and unjust to have to try to survive on it. That's why minimum wage workers need to organize to fight being exploited as well.
The writers trying to live on $25 - 45K/year wouldn't even make that much if they didn't have a union. They are also the ones most vulnerable to the change in entertainment media, because as the studios opt more and more for media outlets NOT covered by union protection, those people stand to lose more revenue the fastest - without the safety-net the Marc Cherrys and the Joss Whedons have to fall back on.
I could go on forever, but I have to get up in the morning to make my stupid measley income so I can try to get my phone turned back on and the oil tank filled in my house so we'll have heat. I'm already behind on the mortgage payment, and have a stack of bills that never seems to shrink. My daughters need new shoes, and somewhere it would be nice to do something - even if only having a special meal at home - for my 50th birthday on Sunday.
[ edited by Nebula1400 on 2007-11-08 06:12 ]
Nebula1400 | November 08, 09:07 CET
Anyway, the problem now is that the showrunners are the ones getting all the media attention for the strike, so the public (who generally don't know that much about the industry) assume the whole thing is about people who already get paid a lot just wanting more money, which of course isn't the case at all (both because not all well-known people are rich and because only a fraction of the guild members are well-known). It's pretty clear from the comments on that site that more than a few people feel this way, which is unfortunate.
Celeste | November 08, 09:21 CET
I just wrote about a book length response to this, and then realized that this wasn't the place. Let me condense my response to this:
I've been in a very similar personal situation before, but didn't blame anyone but the person really responsible - ME. Stop blaming your employer (even though as a professor of sociology and "womens studies", they are likely ultra-lefties much like yourself) for your own choices in life. If you're going to CHOOSE to have 5 kids - and then CHOOSE to homeschool them - then anyone with any intelligence has to realize that this will require large amounts of time and cost a lot of money. Your employer is not responsible for the choices that you made. He or she is also not "exploiting" you because you are not making the amount of money you would like.
Finally, the writers strike will have absolutely no effect on the salary or working conditions of adjunct professors... or on the salaries and working conditions of 99.999% of other Americans. Workers in every field in America do have (and with the exception of the slaves) have ALWAYS had "the right to say when enough is enough". It's called 'quiting'.
[ edited by rkayn on 2007-11-08 08:12 ]
rkayn | November 08, 11:06 CET
"Workers in America do have (and with the exception of slaves) have ALWAYS had the right to say when enough is enough"???
Never mind, you aren't living in any reality that actually exists, or has ever existed.
edited for brevity because if you don't get it, you just don't.
[ edited by Shey on 2007-11-08 11:17 ]
Shey | November 08, 14:14 CET
Also it strikes me as quite amazing that a newspaper in a different country features opinion pieces on this strike.
Celebithil | November 08, 16:12 CET
gossi | November 08, 17:48 CET
I would suggest maybe doing a little reading on what the writers are asking for here. None of them want to quit and why should they? They just want to be paid fairly for the work they do. Just because you choose a career does not mean that you then either live with any conditions forced upon you by the people who employ you or walk away. I'm just very grateful that more people don't think that way and choose not to fight for fair treatment in the workplace or this world would be a very different place today.
RockManic | November 08, 18:01 CET
>He said he knows what it's like to be without work, since he once survived on $25,000 to $45,000 a year when he couldn't get a better-paying TV gig. <
I live in Los Angeles, a rather expensive city in LA, even. I don't need to make 45,000 to live here.
If he had to 'survive' on 25,000 - 45,000, and was finding it difficult, perhaps he should have lived in a less expensive area.
leiasky | November 08, 20:08 CET
TamaraC | November 08, 21:28 CET
leiasky | November 08, 22:14 CET
Lady Brick | November 08, 23:01 CET
But I do think that someone like Marc Cherry should be a little more humble about the issue. Just because Desperate Housewives is "high profile" doesn't mean it isn't trash (I don't think it is, but his attitude makes it sound as if he's producing the kind of intelligent art Joss produces- and he isn't). It's funny to think that some of the most high profile or well paid writers in Hollywood are those who produce completely formulaic, emotionally empty and intellectually devoid rubbish.
Razor | November 09, 01:18 CET
[ edited by Nebula1400 on 2007-11-11 06:08 ]
Nebula1400 | November 09, 01:51 CET