(SPOILER)
New Cloverfield Trailer Online.
The Drew Goddard penned/JJ Abrams produced monster movie is coming soon and here is the high res trailer to combat the bootlegged one out there.
Oh, and the title seems to really be "Cloverfield".
November 19 2007
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


gossi | November 19, 21:45 CET
jam2 | November 19, 21:50 CET
mongorules | November 19, 21:55 CET
deepgirl187 | November 19, 22:06 CET
On a personal note though, I hope it's short cos all the wobbling will probably make me feel sick. Got it at Blair Witch too (not being sick was the best part of that entire film ;).
Saje | November 19, 22:37 CET
ssick | November 19, 23:16 CET
theMidnighter | November 19, 23:18 CET
Harmalicious | November 20, 01:41 CET
GVH | November 20, 01:46 CET
LiLi | November 20, 01:55 CET
TamaraC | November 20, 04:29 CET
Yes, I could really live without seeing New York under attack again. Even aside from the reality of 9/11, it's a disaster movie cliche to see panicked people rushing around NY.
The hand-held doesn't bother me when it's done well, but I fear it will be more Blair Witch than the Bourne Ultimatum.
crossoverman | November 20, 11:27 CET
I dunno, I think this is a (possibly deliberate) attempt to reclaim that mind-space crossoverman. It's actually part of the effect of September 11th that people can't look at footage of the twin towers or explosions in a city (especially one with skyscrapers) without thinking about that day - at some point you have to take that power back from the bastards that did it or else they'll have won a (small but not insignificant) victory for all time. Maybe it's still too soon, maybe the time's right.
And New York, though not the capital of the US, is like London in that it's where most people see the heart of the country as residing I think - it has America's 'Big Ben' or Sidney Opera House in the 'Statue of Liberty' i.e. it's more than just another city. Also, more people are at risk when a city's in trouble and more people live in cities so it's easier to identify with. Finalsolly, how many horror films/invasion movies have been set in small towns or the countryside ? Quite a lot I think.
(and sorry TamaraC but motion sickness tablets make me feel, yep, sick ;). Used to get it on everything but planes - usually, there was one "memorable" flight to Holland during a storm - and trains. My solution ? Learn to drive. Been pretty much fine since then, even as a passenger, no idea why - except where some games/films are concerned)
Saje | November 20, 11:54 CET
On another topic, I think dealing with 9/11 memories is going to be pretty personal and can come without it even being NYC in flames. I just watched Spiderman 3, and though I didn't say anything to anyone, I found the scenes of the crane slicing through the building, uncomfortably reminiscent...I actually found myself getting pretty upset and was immediately aware of why.
newcj | November 20, 12:59 CET
As for handheld, it's never bothered me. I love handheld camerawork. Speaking of handheld "War on Terror"-inspired movies, Brian De Palma recently released the flick Redacted, a faux documentary that is supposed to feel like it's all found footage strung together. I'd love to see it.
UnpluggedCrazy | November 20, 14:54 CET
I haven't seen this Cloverfield trailer in the theater, but when I saw the first one, I do have to say it was odd sitting through that in NYC, a mile or two from the WTC. It won't keep me from seeing the movie, but I expect that oddness will still be there.
jam2 | November 20, 17:52 CET
How is a monster-as-metaphor-for-terrorism invading NY city dealing with this subject intelligently? I think it's pretty heavy-handed and disrespectful.
I happen to think we should be making films about the current political landscape (see: Rendition, for example) - and not movies that continue to spread fear and panic about some foreign menace coming to destroy our cities.
crossoverman | November 20, 21:13 CET
That said, how is it disrespectful? How is taking the pulse of the nation and reflecting it in art disrespectful? That's a pretty important thing to do, for art to take stock of events that have affected all of us. As I said before, it's far from being the first time a monster movie has done the same.
UnpluggedCrazy | November 20, 21:39 CET
zeitgeist | November 20, 21:40 CET
jam2 | November 20, 21:43 CET
And zeitgeist, egads...methinks you've fallen victim to the double/triple post daemon! (Well, until you fixed it.)
UnpluggedCrazy | November 20, 21:50 CET
What about lynching ? ;-)
It might be intelligent or it might not but as UnpluggedCrazy says, these sorts of films reflect their time and have done for decades ("Them !", "Invasion of the Bodysnatchers", "The Day the Earth Stood Still" etc.). They're a way of externalising the threat, of controlling it.
Up until now though, that hasn't been allowed, we (but the US especially) haven't been allowed to own a part of our own cultural space, it's been controlled by what those idjets did in 2001. As I say, maybe it's too soon to start, essentially, putting September 11th in perspective, getting a handle on it by incorporating it into our fictions but it's a necessary step to take at some point IMO.
And of course, we can make both types of film crossoverman (and hopefully they'll be more film than message as opposed to e.g. "Lions for Lambs" which, IMO, was basically all message. Not seen 'Rendition' yet).
(and yeah, if you mean "The Host" jam2 then it had a fairly explicit subtext about the US and "collateral damage" - too explicit for me. Brilliant monster, not a brilliant monster movie IMO - many disagreed though)
Saje | November 20, 22:08 CET
jam2 | November 21, 05:13 CET