The Bluth Family May Pull a Serenity.
The poor box-office performance of Serenity is brought up in regards to the announced Arrested Development movie plans.
And it looks like Universal is interested in bringing another canceled FOX show to the big screen.
February 03 2008
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.



Taste the Happy. (It tastes a lot like sad.)
[ edited by Beren77 on 2008-02-03 22:20 ]
Beren77 | February 03, 22:19 CET
Simon | February 03, 22:43 CET
xerox | February 03, 23:21 CET
I'd possibly go and see it 7 times like I did Serenity.
Ghost Spike | February 03, 23:32 CET
This show was so awesome, I'd love a movie.
electricspacegirl | February 03, 23:35 CET
ProphecyGirl16 | February 03, 23:43 CET
xerox | February 03, 23:48 CET
Succatash | February 03, 23:49 CET
yamsham | February 03, 23:51 CET
Valentyn | February 03, 23:51 CET
TamaraC | February 04, 00:07 CET
Craig Oxbrow | February 04, 00:08 CET
onthemightofprinces | February 04, 01:34 CET
down the street from eachother
FaithsTruCalling | February 04, 01:35 CET
creed is eating an apple, i found a potato | February 04, 01:42 CET
onthemightofprinces | February 04, 01:48 CET
kishi | February 04, 02:26 CET
onthemightofprinces | February 04, 03:14 CET
creed is eating an apple, i found a potato, great reference!
Valentyn | February 04, 03:48 CET
Tinkrebel | February 04, 04:39 CET
twinkiefoo | February 04, 05:37 CET
I couldn't have said it better myself. That really made my day.
Arabchick | February 04, 09:33 CET
Just like with Serenity.
UnpluggedCrazy | February 04, 09:54 CET
Despite the fact that he appears to be in almost everything at the moment, Jason Bateman is made of several different kinds of awesome and needs to be in more ;) ... and so do the rest of the cast of AD, I'd love for this film to be made.
ozfinn | February 04, 10:04 CET
[ edited by RCM on 2008-02-04 10:12 ]
RCM | February 04, 10:11 CET
Or, are you all chicken?
Co-co-CAWWW! Co-co-CAWWW!!...... (Subways away in disgust...)
Beren77 | February 04, 13:15 CET
According to this site 'Firefly' was averaging about 4½-5 million viewers and 'Arrested Development' was around 4.2 million (according to here). So they were pretty comparable.
Which says to me that AD was either much, much cheaper than 'Firefly' (which seems likely - no effects to speak of and though it was a large cast, there weren't any huge names to command massive fees) and/or maybe had someone at Fox that was willing to champion it cos with those numbers it's a small miracle it lasted as long as it did and, as we're all too painfully aware, Fox aren't normally slow off the mark to kill a show that's not performing (as with 'Veronica Mars' we can lament the fact that more people didn't watch but I don't think it's fair - in this instance - to blame the network).
Saje | February 04, 13:25 CET
magnus carnage | February 04, 13:42 CET
Or, less sarcastically, did Fox actually drop the ball in this instance or is it just easier to tell ourselves that than to accept that, as Valentyn claims, "The majority of people watching television are idiots ..." ?
Not entirely convinced of that BTW not least because it effectively means that in Western society - because most people watch TV to a greater or lesser extent - the majority of people full stop are idiots and cynic that I am, i'm not quite willing to lay down and accept that. Yet ;).
(reckon it's more that most people watch TV differently to a lot of us on here i.e. not as "active viewers" - they just want something to veg out in front of after a hard day at work and there's precious little reward in shows like 'Arrested Development' for that kind of viewer)
Saje | February 04, 14:05 CET
With Firefly it was different because they didn't promote, they kept bumping it's timeslot, they even screwed up the running order of episodes and sent truckloads of 'notes' down for every episode.
It basically appeared like Fox went out of there way to kill it because they didn't like the show and wanted to blame poor viewership.
onthemightofprinces | February 04, 14:51 CET
hacksaway | February 04, 18:21 CET
TamaraC | February 04, 18:25 CET
Tinkrebel | February 04, 18:27 CET
[ edited by Tinkrebel on 2008-02-04 20:01 ]
Tinkrebel | February 04, 18:27 CET
Veloxi | February 04, 19:03 CET