(SPOILER)
Review of Angel #1-4.
The faniffic Mark Stoddard of The Nexus reviews the first four issues of Angel Season 6, with references to Buffy Season 8 and what it meant to continue the series.
[ edited by zeitgeist on 2008-02-27 04:31 ]
February 27 2008
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.



jclemens | February 27, 05:13 CET
patxshand | February 27, 05:49 CET
In contrast, the writing on Angel is just as good or better and yet the crucial difference is that *this* I can completely imagine seeing onscreen, "for real". And this distinction doesn't seem entirely a (dys)function of anything lacking in the Buffy storylines, but rather that Angel manages to present the visual information more integrated with the story, despite the fact that its laboring under the same constraints as Buffy, and in a way that (again, to me) seems much more plausible as "the real thing".
(Which is doubly impressive, as I've always considered the comic continuations "official fanfic" as opposed to canon :)
damaged justice | February 27, 06:25 CET
patxshand | February 27, 06:55 CET
zeitgeist | February 27, 07:32 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | February 27, 08:57 CET
Buffy has since delivered some impressively strong issues, including some real emotional punch in the standalones (and I totally grooved on the Faith storyline, too). Given that, I have high hopes for where Angel is going, because the setup has tons of potential.
I think these were good comics, but I also believe they're the setup for far better ones to come.
Ghalev | February 27, 12:25 CET
Ya I agree. It was a great review - and then just a 7. I would personally give the first few issues a 9 overall......:)
angeliclestat | February 27, 14:48 CET
Me myself don't really like the Angel comics that much. I'll keep downloading, but if it stays like it is now, I won't be actually buying them. And the downloading is more of a fan-responsibility than actually liking the content. The stuff does indeed move on faster than Buffy, but even though I'm annoyed to wait 4 months for a single story arch there, it's still better, at least to me.
Though, I never really got into Angel the tv-series either, somehow it was mostly disappointing to me. Season 1 was a good start, and I liked the Darla/Dru parts in season 2, but too many times I just didn't like the things they showed. Especially the karaoke, oh boy should they have left that at one song. I'm really not sure what rubbed me so much, in general I liked the plots and grand elements, I guess I just didn't attach to the characters. Well, at least they managed to throw in a good last season, managed to salvage alot, even with Cordy missing.
Eerikki | February 27, 15:14 CET
And thinking of it as 'fan-responsibility'? It's the opposite of ''fan-responsibility''. If you don't like it fair enough, then don't buy it. But don't think you are being a 'good fan' buy rwading but not paying for it.
[ edited by angeliclestat on 2008-02-27 13:49 ]
angeliclestat | February 27, 16:47 CET
So we're not expected to buy the trade paperbacks then?
beergood | February 27, 17:31 CET
I'm confused.Do you mean you dont want to buy the individual issues but wanna wait for the TPB?Ya thats cool,you can buy the trade paperbacks instead of the individual issues - nothing wrong with that. I plan to and have all my individual issues too.
But as I said, if you download the comics and never buy them whether individually or in TPB format (as was implied by Eerikki)...then it's just wrong.
angeliclestat | February 27, 18:02 CET
However, I do believe that just downloading without purchasing is theft. It's a horrible thing to do to the writers and artists who work so hard to provide us with these stories.
As for the review, I agree with the writer to an extent. However, I don't feel that the introductions were rushed. Actually, I'm relieved that almost everyone is finally accounted for, now we can get to the real meat of the story.
Whistler | February 27, 18:08 CET
Eerikki... yes, I read the review. But 7/10 still doesn't match the review. 7/10 is like getting a 70 on an exam. It's not a good grade. It means that it wasn't bad (5/10 and below) but that it isn't enough to be considered "good" (8/10 and above). From the way the guy talked about the good about 10 times more than the bad, I was at LEAST expecting him to give an 8/ or 9/ out of 10.
If I reviewed the four issues (I don't see the point, as 1-5 are the first arc), I'd give it a 9/10. The first two are perfect 10/10s and the most recent two are solid 9/10s, so it'd even out to a 9/10 for me. On the average, I'd probably give Buffy: Season Eight either the same grade or an 8/10 (8.5?). The recent issues have been good, but #4 was a weak ending and "The Chain" was a steaming hot mess.
patxshand | February 27, 18:56 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | February 27, 19:15 CET
I do download, because I can't wait, my local comic shop sucks, but I then buy them, usually every cover I can get my hands on.
Xane | February 27, 19:32 CET
Rowan Hawthorn | February 27, 19:54 CET
Sorry, but if I buy the comic I see nothing wrong with acquiring a digital copy. Why should I, and other honest folks, be penalized because of a few bad apples? To save the hassle, Darkhorse and IDW should have a service similar to Marvel's. I pay $5/mo for their online service and it's been great.
I thought "The Chain" was beautiful. And I'm loving After the Fall.
Agreed, both have been remarkable. My only gripe is that we have to wait a month between installments. I'd buy them weekly if they were able to churn them out that quickly.
Whistler | February 27, 20:01 CET
To me, Angel S6 seems to 'speak the language of comics' better than Buffy S8. By that I mean that Buffy, when it's good, seems more so for the writing than the art, and that the art, while not always unpleasant, is more often a distraction that doesn't seem entirely integrated with the characters or their actions. And this isn't because I don't think the drawings look like the characters we know and remember -- sometimes I find the resemblances startling.
In contrast, the writing on Angel is just as good or better and yet the crucial difference is that *this* I can completely imagine seeing onscreen, "for real". And this distinction doesn't seem entirely a (dys)function of anything lacking in the Buffy storylines, but rather that Angel manages to present the visual information more integrated with the story, despite the fact that its laboring under the same constraints as Buffy, and in a way that (again, to me) seems much more plausible as "the real thing".
Dude, I totally agree with this. Yet, you've managed to express it much more eloquently than I ever could.
I'm enjoying both, if only for the novelty of having these characters back. Though, maybe my (slight) preference for After the Fall comes from the fact that I always preferred Angel to Buffy on TV. Mostly because the writing was more consistent and compelling throughout. I don't necessarily think the writing was "better", just more ambitious (which isn't to say Buffy wasn't). They were trying to make the series more novelic from "To Shanshu in L.A." onward and were pretty successful in doing that.
[ edited by TheSandyLlama on 2008-02-27 17:03 ]
Dirk | February 27, 20:02 CET
And to announce you're doing it, proudly? Classless.
Brian Lynch | February 27, 21:52 CET
Apollo Gilgamesh | February 27, 21:58 CET
As the series went on, I referred to the comic in three arcs: 1. Reunion, 2. Rewind, and 3...
...oh that's the doozy!
Brian Lynch | February 27, 22:10 CET
I was away from comics for several years, for this reason or that, not really buying stuff or even reading them other than webcomics. When Buffy came out, I downloaded the first 4 episodes, liked them and decided to get the TPB. And since then I not only bought the trade paperback, but I've spent maybe 200 euros on comics since, pretty much only because I downloaded stuff and liked it. And I'm planning to buy more, all the Buffys at least, as soon as the trade paperbacks come out. Now, should I feel bad because I download the episodes in advance? I don't really think so. And if I end up liking the Angels more (sorry about being negative so far, but you can't expect everybody to like everything anyway), I will buy them too.
Now, if I could get the single magazines for the $3 they are sold in the US, I might buy them instead of downloading, I do prefer reading them in paper. But, they cost more than double that, and like I said, I do prefer the paperback versions.
And let me repeat once more, _after_ I downloaded stuff I buy them. Same with movies. Assuming I like it enough, that is.
PS: There are some half-assed tries on buyable web-comics, there was a link here even. But, the solution was a horrendous flash monster, that was really really annoying to use. The torrent sites provide better quality, so I pick them. I'd easily buy a buck for a comic, if it was in decent format, but not much more than that, at least as long as I'll get the paper version later anyways.
Eerikki | February 27, 22:16 CET
Let's break this down:
"Downloading "illegally" to me is closer to "renting from library". Do I feel bad that I downloaded stuff from internet? No. Do I feel bad I bought most of the good stuff after downloading? Again, no."
No, downloading illegally (and don't put it in quotes, it's absolutely illegal) is akin to buying a bootleg of on the street of a movie that's in theaters. Congrats on being that guy!
Brian Lynch | February 27, 22:25 CET
I think it's the final part that's the killer. You like them enough to keep downloading but not to buy them. If you like them enough to keep reading then you should buy them, if you don't then stop reading them otherwise you are essentially stealing when you download them illegally.
helcat | February 27, 22:26 CET
patxshand | February 27, 22:37 CET
[ edited by Whistler on 2008-02-27 19:49 ]
Whistler | February 27, 22:47 CET
So I am politely asking that we get back to discussing the first four issues of After The Fall. If I have to ask again well hello f_w.
Simon | February 27, 22:49 CET
Brian Lynch | February 27, 22:57 CET
Whistler | February 27, 23:04 CET
Next month cannot come fast enough!
angeliclestat | February 27, 23:46 CET
I do wish I liked Angel. Unfortunately, I don't. I'm not saying the comic is bad, which it obviously isn't. It just doesn't "do" it for me. I'm sure part of that is from the Angel tv-series, which I didn't really get either. It too had its moments, but mostly it was just a generic better-than-most-others series, watch once and forget. I seriously considered selling the dvds after watching, but I decided to keep them for the occasional Buffy rewatch.
Still who knows, maybe I do start liking the comics too, and end up having to rewatch the series too. I do think it's possible, assuming the rushed introductions are done and the characters start getting more than a couple of panels each. Currently it just feels too rushed, too all-over-the-place, too confusing and directionless. Ah well, only first 4 out, here's hoping it'll start getting together.
Eerikki | February 28, 00:15 CET
Brian Lynch | February 28, 01:15 CET
First of all, it is not stealing. Stealing by definition is taking something away from somebody. If I copy something, it's not taken away from anybody. Big difference there. There is some implied loss for the creators, but you could say the same for listening to a song in radio or borrowing a book from library, you're not paying for it...
Second, I really have limited options here, ordering just a single issue trans Atlantic is costly, and like I stated before I do prefer the trade paperbacks. I would pay for the online reading, if there was an option to do so. However, it's impossible; the issues come out much much later (if at all) and in vastly inferior format (flash versus .cbr).
And, finally. I do buy the stuff I like. I just wait for the release of the paperback, and place an order for a bunch of comics at a time. Hence the comparison to the library, I first check it out and if I like it, I buy. Hell, I might buy the Angels too when the next Buffy album is out, depends what comics there are available (it's nicer to buy a bunch at once to split the postage).
Sorry about ranting and the bad vibes, I'm off now.
Eerikki | February 28, 03:39 CET
Yes it is. If you read the comics by downloading them without buying them it is stealing.You are creating a loss for the creators because that is money that you would have spent on their product gone.Think whatever you want to make yourself feel better but it is.
*If I copy something, it's not taken away from anybody.*
You are not copying.You dont have the original comic.
Oh and it's nothing like borrowing from a library. The books in library's have at least been bought by the library so money has been handed over. This way you may as well go into the comic store, slide a copy of the latest Angel into your jacket and walk out. Same thing.
Sorry Simon needed to be said....back on track now.
---------
One point that the reviewer made about characters returns.I dont think the return of characters was rushed at all in Angel. Each character has gotton a great (re)introduction, their place in the story made clear (and their relation to Angel's story made clear), and the plot has still moved forward at the same time. Look how much we have gotton in the issues so far in regards to plot. Questions answered and more questions raised. I think a lot will be addressed in First Night too.
And I like Brian's whole "1:Reunion,2:Rewind and 3:...) thing. What other 'Re's' can we think of. "Reclaiming" of LA maybe?
[ edited by angeliclestat on 2008-02-28 01:04 ]
angeliclestat | February 28, 04:01 CET
Sunfire | February 28, 04:48 CET
What do I win?
OldMusic | February 29, 02:23 CET