Harvard Independent gives Buffy Season 8 comic the thumbs down.
The article describes the comic as "rather like a second helping of dessert on a full stomach...".
FTA: Many facets of the narrative in the eighth season of Buffy appear unintentionally vague, incomprehensible or unclear, not because of poor writing (what blasphemy it is to ever consider Joss Whedon and poor writing in the same context) but because of the change in medium.
February 28 2008
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


But it's late, and I'm tired, so I am just going to say that if the article's author finds Buffy Season 8 to be so flawed- why does her final paragraph literally beg for more of the series?
missb | February 28, 13:42 CET
azhippieinoz | February 28, 14:21 CET
There has been mucho pathos in the series, and that is lacking in practically every medium today.
magnus carnage | February 28, 14:37 CET
[ edited by Simon on 2008-02-28 16:43 ]
Dana5140 | February 28, 14:43 CET
But there are people that love it, so it's all good.And yes with the new revelations of 16-19, that may push me off the ship and stay with my Angel and Serenity comics.
angeliclestat | February 28, 14:48 CET
Flaws of course, like beauty, are in the eye of the beholder. Except Gigli, I think we can all agree on that one.
Anyway, I've been enjoying S8, yet not as much as I hoped. So far I've enjoyed the Faith arc the most – and while I liked what her character brought to the mix, I was never a huge Faith fan, so I was so pleasantly pleased with that arc. I agree with Truc Doan that "The Chain " is the single best issue.
When I say I haven't enjoyed it as much as I hoped, its because there are still aspects of the story and the characterization that I don't like, however I know this is Joss so I'm very willing to take the ride and see where it ends up, and I think the author of the article feels the same way.
I think another way to put it is that Joss Whedon's failures are more interesting than most people's successes. Now I'm not saying that S8 is a failure just because there are aspects of it I don't like or would take in another direction.
One of the reasons I love Joss is that he is brave enough to try new things. In regards to Buffy though I think things have become a bit comfortably/uncomfortably formulaic, i.e. huge arc, Buffy alone, a real bad Big Bad to defeat. Haven't we all seen this before?
How much more interesting would things be if Joss had broken from that formula?
Of course the big break from formula was the contentious S6, which I recently re-watched over about 4 days and while I enjoyed (if that's the right word) it when it first aired S6 holds together even better being able to "read" it like a chapters in a book. It remains a fabulous 22 hours of TV (and for me holds together better than the similar attempt in Angel S4 - which was too Oedipussy for me – wait! wasn't that a James Bond movie?).
So that brought us the equally controversial S7 which I cannot, despite many attempts, rewatch in its entirety and suffered, among other things, from trying to be all seasons to all people IMHO.
And thence comes S8 , and yes there are some familiar tropes like Buffy alone or isolating herself – yet I see growth toward her changing that and I'm curious how the predicted "betrayal" will effect that growth. So I'm willing to go along.
By the same token could we please heal the rift between Buffy and Giles already? I still don't buy it and think much damage was done to ASW's character for the sake of plot in S7 that has yet to be rectified.
Even though I'm not a huge fan of the Campbellian classic heroes arc, there are times when I wish the show had ended after S5
Joss himself once said (and I'm going from memory, so Help Quotergal! Help!) that: "Buffy was was a beautiful symphony with all the movements leading to the next and then coming to a wonderful resolution in the final movement. And that was the end of Season 5 and we still did 2 more after that."
Anyway... I've got to get to work, more later...maybe...
[ edited by malformed on 2008-02-28 16:20 ]
[ edited by malformed on 2008-02-28 16:21 ]
[ edited by malformed on 2008-02-28 16:23 ]
malformed | February 28, 14:58 CET
She has a few points, some of which seem straightforwardly true to me (it's less immediate, issues are shorter than episodes and 'Chosen' would've been a fine place to end it), some of them not so much. Ultimately of course it's an opinion, just the same as all of ours and equally meaningless/full. She also seems to contradict the body of the article in the final paragraph (it's either doing something for her or it's not - if all she's saying is that the comic isn't as "good" from a fan's perspective as the TV series well i'd say that's bordering on facile it's so obvious - we didn't fall in love with the comic, after all).
... it reversed its message from the end of Chosen ("hey, let's empower all the slayers and then put them under my control!")
Nah. Even if you assume Buffy actually controls all the Slayers in her "army", that's only 500 or so out of what, a couple of thousand ?
The comic's working fine IMO, it's just slower moving than the series and, i'll admit, harder to get emotionally involved with (partly because, no matter how much I enjoy reading it, I know i'd enjoy seeing the actors perform it much more). Just to play the broken record again though, we've had 2 episodes plus some "webisodes", judging whether it's working is like judging a season after 3 weeks.
[ edited by Saje on 2008-02-28 15:26 ]
Saje | February 28, 15:25 CET
Oh - I guess that kinda supports the point, doesn't it? Nevermind...
Rowan Hawthorn | February 28, 16:15 CET
Invisible Green | February 28, 16:26 CET
Sunfire | February 28, 16:45 CET
ManEnoughToAdmitIt | February 28, 16:58 CET
Still, its far too early to say whether or not the overall feast was enjoyable or a success.
Foodily yours...
malformed | February 28, 17:08 CET
In any case, let's continue to focus on the content of the review rather than its source, ta very much.
SoddingNancyTribe | February 28, 17:19 CET
Rusty626 | February 28, 17:24 CET
On the other hand, this reversing the message business is where I have to take issue, because a character doesn't just cease to exist when her show ends. I mean, the last line of the show was "What are we going to do now?" Those characters continued to live in our minds, and obviously in Joss' mind, and people don't tend to glide through life without confilct. One bold choice wouldn't change that, nor would it make Buffy & Co. suddenly infallable. Every choice has a consequence. So to suggest that a character should just stop acting human after she makes a statement...well, that's kind of a limited view of storytelling. It's the kind of storytelling that's interested in making that statement, and then moving on. What makes Joss' storytelling interesting though, is his ruthless exploration of human behavior. So in that regard, I say rock on Season 8.
Samantha | February 28, 19:49 CET
I think disparaging many, many people because you disagree with one person's viewpoint is unfair.
micro | February 28, 21:25 CET
On a very sueprficial level I see that point b ut let
s be serious. In the first place, Buffy enjoys being a hero, so she's not going to walk away completely*. And also there's a simple fact of responsibility. Given how many lives her decision affected, she owes it to her own karma if naught else to be involved in picking up after herself.
SoddingNancyTribe; I've been wondering, could I ask what job you do (I have absolutely no desire to know your name, tho, and I'm not even hinting at asking that) that makes you into a purple person? (I don't imagine any Eaters are flying by.) And I'm just asking.
DaddyCatALSO | February 28, 23:05 CET
azhippieinoz | February 29, 01:32 CET
DaddyCatALSO | February 29, 02:42 CET
(But my name, which is not the source of my power, is no secret - it's on my profile.)
SoddingNancyTribe | February 29, 03:51 CET
Just my 2 cents.
SmileTime | February 29, 10:33 CET
Because the eighth season was forced to continue from a series whose primary conflict had resolved, it had no choice but to pretend otherwise in order to keep the storyline going. Although the last scene of the last episode was of Buffy, surrounded by close friends and family, finally coming to grips with the fact that she was no longer alone, the eighth season does it best to continue an internal conflict that, for all intents and purposes, was already terminated. After having alienated her best friend for a very vague and unclear reason, Buffy has a conversation with Xander, another close companion, about the loneliness of leadership and power (both of which should have been moot points post-“Chosen”).
Maybe. Or, maybe, Buffy made a decision--a correct decision--that also has consequences that can't be ignored, and Buffy still refuses to share the consequences of what is in fact her decision with the thousands of girls around the world who didn't make it. As the 'verse pointed out over and over again, one gesture--no matter how great--can't make everything all better, not the world, and not one's personal demons. It's a constrant struggle. And that's why the show shouldn't have ended with season five, or season seven.
WilliamTheB | February 29, 16:46 CET
micro | February 29, 16:57 CET
ajay42 | February 29, 17:35 CET
Dana5140 | February 29, 19:13 CET
In other words, a poor substitute for the real, original, living thing. The comics are parasitic in that they can't function without the reader's vivid memory of the show. In my opinion, they don't stand & breathe on their own. But they are fine for what they are: thin nourishment for Buffy/Whedon-deprived fans like myself. I am so looking forward to watching "Dollhouse". (Know it's been said before but I will say it again : "SSSQQQQUUUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!")
stellabee | February 29, 19:34 CET