March 20
2008
Buffy vs. Dracula - a meta essay.
Find out why the Buffy season 5 premiere mattered back then and why it matters now.
Simon
| BtVS
| 17:41 CET
|
16 comments total
| tags: buffy, dracula
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Video interview with Summer Glau a...
|
NYT reviews DB Woodside in The Con...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2008 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
menomegirl | March 20, 18:31 CET
Sunfire | March 20, 19:00 CET
menomegirl | March 20, 19:08 CET
Assuming he didn't hypnotize you in the meantime and you forgot to pay attention. ;)
Sunfire | March 20, 19:21 CET
So finally I get what the big shocker was in issue 12. The return of Dracula. Duh!
barboo | March 20, 19:23 CET
cookiepartier | March 20, 20:23 CET
Numfar PTB | March 20, 20:37 CET
But I'm of the opinion that Anne is the better season opener.
Capt. Logic | March 20, 23:26 CET
Madhatter | March 21, 00:16 CET
I don't have any major problems with Buffy vs Dracula, I thought it was an interesting episode and it was definitely a brilliant idea to actually introduce such an iconic character into the Buffyverse. I like the fact that, as the article pointed out, a vampire is hinting at the source of Buffy's power, which does create a nice parallel with the first slayer in Restless. The power of being a slayer is something that was explored several times throughout the series, and Buffy vs Dracula lays a strong framework for episodes like Get It Done and Chosen.
But I was slightly confused by the practicality of the episode, and the fact that Buffy couldn't kill Dracula. It was funny, but it didn't really make much sense within the Buffyverse. Wouldn't the gang try to discover a method of killing, or at least imprisoning him? Given Dracula's attempts at seducing Buffy I don't imagine him simply giving up and leaving town.
Even worse, though, is the whole Xander and Dracula relationship from Tales of the Vampires. I know it's been discussed quite a lot, especially with the reappearance of Dracula in season 8, but I just don't think it matches in any way with the way we've seen Xander's character arc progress. I couldn't imagine anything similar happening to any of the other empowered main characters, so why would it happen to Xander?
I'm hoping that the story as presented in TotVs will be somehow retconned, as Buffy's decoy improved The Girl in Question. Like Dracula is so old that time moves differently for him so he felt like it was a year, when it was only a day, or something.
Razor | March 21, 00:52 CET
A cyberfriend of mine has used Dracula prominently in a couple fics but she's shy-ish about posting her stuff.
"The darkness that Dracula speaks of may be the source of the Slayer, but it’s not the sum total of Buffy Summers"
One of Joss 's major recurring points, methinks. Traits that seem to be linked often aren't inherently so. (A defense I've had to make of msyelf on some BtVS boards, as to how a self-described Reagan Republican can also be a big Willow - Tara fan.)
And since I'm thinking of Rudolph Martin, an alternate last scene for "Chosen."
A dark-haired Sarah wakes up in bed on an old All My Children:
"honey, I just had the craziest dream. I was this super-strong woman fighter in a California suburb who protected people from vampires and demons. I was being advised by a stuffy English librarian who used to be a hippie and had all kinds of ancient books. My best friend and sidekick was a red-headed witch who was ahudnred times more powerful than I was, and my other sidekick was a film and cartoon geek guy witha great build. And i was sleeping with a gorgeous muscle-man bleach-blonde English vampire!" Then she lies back down.
then Rudolph pokes his head up from the other side of the bed looking annoyed and says "A korcheous muskle-man pleach-plont Englitch wampire?"
[ edited by DaddyCatALSO on 2008-03-21 01:24 ]
DaddyCatALSO | March 21, 04:15 CET
chance | March 21, 05:03 CET
my .02
Let's face it.. the monsters in Buffy were never really scary.. never scared anyone... except for HUSH... what got to us was the human drama-- that everything made great emotional sense. Having said that-- Dracula was a great silly ploy to introduce the season because he played the role of dark truth/lie-teller... "You think you know.. but you have no idea"-- truth ..and "You're a killer" which is a lie...
It's what the whole season is about...
Season 5 is the greatest season.. for lots of reasons.
Mainly.. it plays with the notion of what does it mean to be a strong female? Does it mean you have to be like the stereotypical male hero--- all alone at the end... willing to sacrifice what you love most to save the world (like Abraham in the bible)?
OR is the female hero different?
Well DUH
The female hero is totally diff.
She may struggle with the same problems that all heroes face...."At the end of the day, I'm all I've got" or does she rely on friends?
Again.. throughout the whole SERIES Buffy struggles with that.. up until the last season.
So.. what about the end of that season?
She sacrifices herself to save the world RATHER than kill Dawn.
She inverts the Abraham story.
A patriarch- Giles.. tells her that killing her sister is what she must do to save the world... EEK .. .It's what a man would do..It's what Abraham was willing to do..
And she refuses.
The interesting thing is one of those weird lines that comes out of nowhere...
TARA: (points to Giles) You're a killer. (Giles and Spike look at her in surprise) This is all set down
The whole "You're a killer" thing.. well.. there's that word again .. Killer...
The killer is the MAN who is willing to do something so hideous as kill Dawn..
Not Buffy..
She would rather kill herself... sacrifice herself rather than kill her own flesh and blood.
It's one of the most radical feminist statements we've seen on mainstream TV..... EVER.
If Abraham would've been a Woman.... well...think about it.....
Season 6 and 7 are great for different reasons... But Season 5.. pure f***ing art.
The arcs are so clearly delineated.
The "killer" motif... well.. is totally clear and is true to the feminist intent of the show.
The "Body" is one of the most intense episodes of TV ever written.
I'm still offended by the last episodes of Six Feet Under because Ruth Fisher just seemed to heal so quickly after Nates death... Yet, what followed in season 5 and 6 AFTER the death of Buffy's mom is all about grief and mourning.
Yup kids.. Season 5.. amazing.
hbojo | March 21, 05:25 CET
But: Seriously, Season 5 is truly my favorite. For several of the reasons you cite, not to mention the incredible Glory/Ben interplay. Just brilliant. Buffy's Christlike sacrifice (she becomes a cross with that swan dive off the tower) is pure genius.
And: while I love BVD, the best season opener was "When She Was Bad" from Season 2. For many, many reasons, but I'll just cite the moment where Buffy is simultaneously crushing the hearts of Willow, Xander, and Angel in the Bronze. Phenomenal.
Chris inVirginia | March 21, 06:39 CET
Pointy | March 21, 09:08 CET
It was bruited about on one or two other websites that the whole "Buffy vs Dracula" epsiode was an illusion caused by the monks' spell, that when Drac tasted Buf was the hallucinatory version of the monks' taking a cell sample to make Dawn. I never l;iked that much and I guess it's canonically disproven now!
chance; Yes, during S-7 I came up with not just a Newhart ending but also Brian's Song, Blake's 7, and Casablanca versions. (Drusilla was featured in both of the latter two.) (Along with a more original idea I used as springboard for my "World Beyond the Wall" fic series.) Soem cyberfriends of mine came up with (partly at my request) MASH, MAry Tyler Moore, and Xena versions.
DaddyCatALSO | March 21, 16:20 CET