March 22 2008
Amber Benson and Tom Lenk talk PETA.
Passionate words from the actors.
© 2002 - 2008 - WHEDONesque.com
(e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.

Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.


Perseo | March 22, 12:32 CET
Shey | March 22, 14:41 CET
swanjun | March 22, 18:38 CET
fangless | March 22, 20:16 CET
theclynn | March 22, 21:53 CET
I support them 100% in the non-insane things they do, though. There are many horrible things that animals go through that they shouldn't have to.
HydeMe | March 23, 05:47 CET
Yeah, it's probably wrong.
Romo Lampkin | March 23, 07:25 CET
cleveland | March 23, 13:09 CET
I admire Tom and Amber, but sure wish they would use their star power to really help animals and support the myriad organizations that are really interested in animal welfare instead of animal rights. (The former believes in humans being kind and humane toward animals and the latter is about abolishing the pet/human bond.)
I worked in an animal shelter for years and PETA never did a single thing to make the world better for any of those animals.
Chelleatrix | March 24, 09:54 CET
ShadowQuest | March 24, 11:35 CET
The more people bond with animals, the less likely they are to mistreat them.
GrrrlRomeo | March 24, 11:38 CET
At this point in history there has to be mass euth. There are just too many animals and not enough homes. PETA's sin here is their dishonesty about it. It's a dishonesty shared by many, but not all, "no-kill" shelters. It's a game of semantics in that most animal shelters put animals to sleep, but some shelters opt to put that in the "fine print." So, a shelter that is up front can get a bad rep for having the same basic policies as a "no-kill," other than having a more open door policy about admitting animals.
Eh, not what this board is for.
The point is that I see so many celebs supporting PETA, and it seems a real shame when I don't believe they truly help animals. I'd rather go naked than support PETA. However, in some ways it's the safer choice than to acknowledge that until we as a society get our "stuff" together, responsible organizations are forced to put animals to sleep.
I agree with GrrrrlRomeo's point. The two best things we can do for animals is a stronger focus on spay/neuter and helping create a lasting human/animal bond. PETA says that we should have never domesticated animals, but there is no turning back the clock. Making this the cornerstone of their organization is a whole lot of Not Helpful.
I'm not one of those people who seem to think celebs should keep their opinions private and only support non-controversial causes. Just because someone has the power to reach more people doesn't mean they should be silent. However, I honestly see something sad in people who clearly love animals and having the power to make a huge difference aligning with this particular group.
Chelleatrix | March 24, 12:17 CET
This is a serious and long standing misconception. One of the original founders of PETA (who is no longer with the organization) held this view but it has never been an officially held belief of the group as a whole.
One reason it's been easy to keep this misinformation going is that there is a grain of truth to it. PETA doesn't believe in taking wild animals out of their natural habitat and breeding them or keeping them as pets, which is actually in violation of the CITES International Treaty in more cases than not, anyhow.
I share my home with three Amazon Parrot companions, but I still support the vast majority of PETA's goals. My parrots were bred at home, long before I understood that their wild captured parents came into captivity as part of an ugly, brutal and mostly illegal operation. I was a breeder for over fifteen years but I never once sold a baby to a pet shop or a large breeding operation, I did it like a "parrot adoption agency".
As I came to understand the ramifications of the exploding parrot over-population problem, my ex and I donated our breeding pairs to a wonderful local zoo with free flight aviaries, keeping only three home bred pets.
This is a complex issue and not everyone who supports or even belongs to PETA holds the exact same views. But overall, I think they do a lot of good.
Shey | March 25, 16:48 CET
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.