Wow, that guy seems generally rude to everyone. I'm almost ashamed that he, or at least as he claims, likes the same show I do.

But I can take heart in knowing I enjoyed I'm With Busey and Strangers With Candy.

Fittztopher | June 20, 18:19 CET

Is it just me or does it seem like he just picked out the ineptly written "responses"? The ones that were very easy to mock...quality journalism there.

And I also liked I'm With Busey, the writer guy's confusion at Busey's antics are some of the best moments. This R.D.Heldenfels guy is lame.

ringworm | June 20, 19:35 CET

Would it kill him to mention "Whedonesque"? Some entertainment reporters are hipper than others, I guess.

DaveW | June 20, 21:28 CET

I thought "I'm With Busey" was quite amusing ... So far, It's kind of like going out on the town with Michael Essany and Tom Green; one crazy guy and a victim to torture … quite amusing.

"Strangers with Candy" wasn't a bad show ... its like 500lbs of dynamite without a fuse ... too much deadpan, but nobody does it better. If you do happen to laugh, you may not stop.

Why does everyone criticize season 4? It’s not Shakespeare … It’s not perfect. What was so wrong with it? So Cyber-Frankenstein wasn’t the best villain ever, but he was interesting. If you’re really looking for season to criticize, what about season one, it was finding its footing sure, but it wasn’t always pretty, or you could cite the UPN years' lack of humor. Stop complaining, if Joss Whedon is involved chances are whatever it is, will be better than anything else on television.

ascii_102_117 | June 20, 22:00 CET

Adam was better than the First, I'll tell you that.

brother_grady | June 20, 22:57 CET

Adam was better than the First, I'll tell you that.

In concept? Absolutely not.

In execution? Sadly, yes.

ringworm | June 20, 23:19 CET

I don't know--the First sort of grows on you, if you give it some thought...

Maeve | June 23, 17:28 CET