As a fan of Spider-Man, I would absolutely LOVE this. Ever since J. Michael Straczynski left Spidey, it's been lacking (with the exception of a couple issues here and there) and I think it would only be fitting if a writer of Joss' ability took over Amazing Spider-Man.

Plus, I enjoy my comics more when Joss is writing them.

BigLandoz | June 14, 00:55 CET

I thought Joss' rendition of Spidey was the stand out of that issue. You could tell Joss really enjoyed using him even from the short time he was in that issue.

noplaceIcanbe | June 14, 01:13 CET

Oh I was worried he wanted Joss to write a Spiderman movie, which (IMO) would be a big waste of his time, but since he only wants a Spiderman comic then I'm cool with that. I really loved how Joss got Spiderman's voice in the Astonishing X-man finale!

embers | June 14, 01:14 CET

I'd love to see Joss write Spidey as well, he totally nailed Peter there. Plus he could do the gut wrenching angst too.

Personally, I'd love to see him write a Cap comic. You know, Steve Rogers Captain America, the REAL Captain America.

Elf | June 14, 01:52 CET

I think that Joss could do some great things with Daredevil, as well. I had a lot more respect for him after reading Daredevil: Born Again.

*sobs* Captain America...I think that he could do some great plotlines and even further characterization with him. It seems like he became more of a person after the Civil War series; then again, he became kind of dead after the series as well.

Hell, I'd love to read anything Joss writes for almost any superhero. I bet he could even make me like Superman, and that takes a lot of doing, as I think the guy is kind of a weenie. In a strong, invincible, oafish kind of way, but still! I think it would be a dream come true if he could write the Goddamn Batman. I would rejoice.

Really, I would quite love to have Joss work on almost any comic out there. American Virgin would be really interesting; I would love to see him do something like Wanted, which was quite firmly in the realm of badass. Really, except for Fables (which I love, love, love), Joss would improve anything to the degree of n.

/geek out session. Sleep time.

BandofBuggered | June 14, 02:10 CET

I'm not sure about a Joss version of Batman, to be honest. I would rather see Joss go nuts on more obscurish (for Marvel) characters or any DC character below the Big Three. For example... Cloak and Dagger. For some reason, I could see Joss making Cloak and Dagger really interesting. On the DC side, I'd go with Firestorm. I don't know if DC still publishes the character, but the two people in one body angle might be a uniquely fun thing with Joss writing it. Or, a new Green Lantern, who is a spunky but sensitive young woman between age 17 and 22 who's dealing with the problems of adolescense and extraordinary powers :)

KingofCretins | June 14, 02:52 CET

Joss totally needs to write Spidey. I've been saying for years (to anyone who'll hold still enough to listen) that Buffy is Spidey in vampire-slaying drag.

dottikin | June 14, 03:02 CET

Joss writing Spider-man has to be the biggest no-brainer in the history of comics, asking if he should is almost a trick question ;).

In fact the only reason he maybe shouldn't is because he's too well suited to it i.e. it wouldn't be different enough for him, wouldn't stretch him in new directions. Batman on the other hand would IMO (especially if he went for the more procedural, detectivey Batman). Not saying i'd like to see him on it for years and years but i'd love to see a few mainline arcs from Big Purp. Or an Elseworlds, wouldn't hate that either.

Saje | June 14, 04:08 CET

I love the current stuff Marvel's doing with Spider-Man - both in Amazing and Ultimate - but I absolutely adored what Joss did with him in GSAXM - making his personality shine through without even taking the mask off (which is usually a prerequisite for a Spidey solo story).

daylight | June 14, 04:53 CET

Joss would be great to write Spidey, but maybe as a limited series, in which the writing has been completed well in advance of the solicitations. Joss's Runaways and X-men had enough problems coming out on anything resembling a schedule, and now that he's working on Dollhouse, I can't see him devoting the time that he'd need for a monthly or even bimonthly book.

[ edited by Dym on 2008-06-14 11:22 ]

Quit | June 14, 05:21 CET

I would love to see Joss do a run on Spidey even if it was just a two or three issue arc of Amazing Spider-Man.

Buffyfantic | June 14, 08:18 CET

I agree with all of you on the Joss-Spidey love.

But it was Embers' comment that made me think. What if they did actually tap Joss to write a Spiderman movie? Usually when a franchise reaches 4th and 5th installments, they are exceptionally bad. But if we had Joss penning the 4th installment, I bet it would have noticeably better dialog than the first 3.

Can anyone think of an example of a film that has had several installments where a 4th, 5th or even 6th movie suddenly exceeds expectations, gets great reviews and is obviously much better than the previous films? The latest Bond flick, Casino Royale, was able to do it but the credit goes to actor Daniel Craig. I can't think of an example of a writer having that kind of impact.

As the comic readers in the room know, we see comic book writers having this kind of impact all the time. I'd like to see Joss collaborate with Alan Moore and with art by Goon creator, Eric Powell.

alexreager | June 14, 08:23 CET

Joss should absolutely, without any question, get to do an arc on Amazing Spider-Man. Now that they have the rotating creative teams, there's no reason this can't happen (aside from Joss not having time, of course). I've always thought he'd be a fantastic writer for Spidey because Buffy's personality is really not un-Spidey-ish, and the Spidey appearance in Astonishing just proved that his style is perfect for the character.

And I'd love to see him write a Spidey movie, too. As alexreager said above, it could be a good way to bring the franchise back on track. :)

spidermansays | June 14, 08:39 CET

Since Joss's run on a lot of Marvel comics are ending, I would like him to pick up something new.

andrewisfat | June 14, 09:08 CET

alexreager, I agree that Daniel Craig was a huge part of Casino Royale's success, but I don't think that he was the only significant reason why the film was such a refreshing, exciting instalment in a tired series- the script was sophisticated and intelligent, the direction flawless, the rest of the cast provided some excellent support, and the action was much more realistic and innovative than previous instalments in the series had been. To me, it felt like a much smarter, more adult Bond without the ridiculous comic book leanings of its immediate predecessors. Daniel Craig brought it all together and did an excellent job but I think it was an excellent collaborative effort.

That said, I can't really think of many film series which boasted decent instalments after the 3rd film. I wouldn't really include film series like James Bond or Harry Potter in this sort of category, because they were always intended to be part of a much longer series and thus each film is usually judged on its own merits rather than as a trilogy followed by disappointing 4th or 5th films, or an intended standalone film which suddenly becomes a trilogy (think The Matrix and Pirates of the Caribbean, which never managed to match the strength of the original films).

And there is the recent phenomenon of resurrecting old classic action film series with new films, many years later, like with Indiana Jones, Die Hard, Rambo, Rocky and Terminator. I think at least a few of those have managed to make an impact as decent follow ups to the series they originated from.

Something like Spiderman is slightly different because it seems like there is a fourth film being prepared which will follow on directly after the first three, rather than being brought back years later. The third film was a little disappointing, but I didn't think it was entirely without merit, so it would be nice if the fourth film could manage to be a brilliant film like the second was, although it is more likely that it will follow the rule of diminishing returns.

I'd definitely feel more confident of its success if the third Spiedy film had maintained the quality of the second, but I do think that it was a case of a very talented group of people making some poor decisions and ending up with a flawed film, but that there is still the potential there for them to create another great film. Having Joss script the film would definitely greatly improve the chances of delivering a satisfying film.

Razor | June 14, 12:23 CET

Star Trek IV,VI,and VIII were pretty good.

Part of the the problems with Spider-Man 3,and I actually really liked 3 although it wasn't as good as 1 and 2,were that Sam Raimi was forced to use Venom by the producers.Venom is a character that Raimi never cared for and never connected with but the producers made him use him because so many fans wanted Venom in a Spider-Man film.Raimi was forced to go with a character he didn't want to and re-write the script to satisfy the producers.

Raimi wanted to use Sandman and The Vulture.

[ edited by Buffyfantic on 2008-06-14 20:22 ]

Buffyfantic | June 14, 12:33 CET

Carry Ons.

Simon | June 14, 12:40 CET

True, though they changed as they went on too, became much broader ('Carry on Sergeant' is actually fairly restrained and even witty - it's also possibly the prototypical "motley crew of misfits come good in the end" film, 20 years later we got 'Stripes' then 'Police Academy').

'Sudden Impact' wasn't terrible and i'd agree that Star Trek had some great later instalments (in fact on some days I might even put VI as my favourite - other days it's Khaaaannnnn of course ;). And comparing 'Casino Royale' to previous Bond movies is like comparing 'Batman Begins' to the Adam West Batman IMO, apples and oranges (I still love the earlier films and always will but only on their own tongue-in-cheek, slightly jingoistic merits).

Raimi wanted to use Sandman and The Vulture.

Well, he should've got over it and taken Sandman out then.

1 and 2 were good because they had a clear throughline for Peter and the villain but 3 became muddled and rushed when it tried to tell too many stories at once (Venom, Sandman, Harry and Peter) which led to idiocies like Harry's butler telling him that Spidey didn't kill his dad just to set up an extremely obvious denouement. Much as Sandman gave us some great scenes, most of the film's issues stem from shoe-horning him in when there really wasn't room for him IMO.

Saje | June 14, 12:51 CET

I would much rather see Joss concentrate on original ideas. Of course his visions for the oldies are very cool; I think he is much more suited for his own original stuff... It seems the industry is lacking in fresh ideas so they keep going back and reimagining the classics. If any one could come up with the next big thing, it would be joss.

tuckers brother | June 14, 13:07 CET

Do I love Joss? Yes. Do I love Spider-man? Yes. Would I read Joss writing Spidey? Absolutely. Do I want Joss to become the writer for ASM. Heck no. For the flagship title of Marvel you have to have consistency. You have to have the book come out every month without fail. So unless Joss could guarantee that, which I figure would be quite hard given his production flow over his comic career, then I have to say no. Maybe a mini of some kind that is written in advance. But as the main writer of the series (which now comes out three times a month), I would be reluctant.

doyn | June 14, 13:33 CET

Maybe later, but Joss should steer clear of Spidy until the Brand New Day fiasco is over. (Although with Dollhouse, I doubt he would have time anyway). Amazing Spider-Man is in shambles now since Peter and Mary Jane's marriage was erased, and the last thing Joss would need to get involved in is that mess.

FaithFan | June 14, 13:42 CET

I would be fine with Joss doing a Spidey movie if they didn't change things around. I was so angry with how they used Gwen Stacy's character in SM3, because I think that in the original series her character was important to Peter/Spidey's development both in her life and in her death...and in the movie she was basically reduced to being "the other woman." They shoulda just not used her at all.

And I agree with Saje that Spiderman would not be too much of a stretch for Joss, but that something like Batman would because of his personality and methods. Plus I don't really see Bats as the humorous type, so it would be interesting to see how Joss would incorporate his trademark humor. Alfred, for one, I suspect. :)

BandofBuggered | June 14, 15:48 CET

I agree that one of the major problems with Spiderman 3 was that they tried to cram way too much into the film, particularly having three villains, which led to it being too frantic and unsatisfying because none of the new characters were given enough screen time to be introduced and given enough depth, and all of the characters seemed secondary to the plot, so it was very hard to believe in or care for their development. Gwen Stacey was a good example of a character that didn't really have a story of her own and would have been better replaced with a nameless female character since she served only to slightly complicate Peter's relationship with Mary Jane.

I think the story could have coped with even any two of the three villains, say for example focusing on exploring Harry and his eventual redemption, with either of the other two villains acting as another thematically unimportant menace to service his plot.

But even such a major structural flaw wasn't, in my opinion, the only problem- a lot of the ideas weren't simply rushed and underdeveloped, but simply ridiculous. The idea of Peter exploring the dark side of his power was a classic theme which every superhero experiences, and there was a lot of potential there to explore his character in interesting ways, struggling with issues like control, power, responsibility and abiding by the law (after all, "With great power comes great responsibility").

It would have been more interesting to see him accidentally kill someone, or have to weigh personal benefit against the greater good. I'm thinking of the type of themes Joss explored with characters like Faith and even the issues Buffy experienced with leading other Potentials/slayers in seasons seven and eight, and also the issues raised in relation to Willow's magical prowess. Instead we saw Peter turn into a ridiculous character and the whole subplot treated like some sort of joke. I really didn't understand whether we were meant to see his transformation to a cheesy womaniser as his "dark side" because I had been expecting something much more interesting and dangerous.

Razor | June 14, 18:20 CET

I thought Sandman was fine in Spider-Man 3, but Venom wasn't as spectacular or interesting as the hype would've had you believe. He didn't look all that cool either, compared to the hulking mass of inky tentacle-producing nightmare they sometimes manage to draw him as in the comics. #3 would've been better served by only introducing Eddie Brock (and Topher Grace was fun and funny, despite the WTF of the character praying to God to kill Peter in the church. They didn't really get into why he was such a wacko or how he managed to end up with Gwen). The symbiote could've played a part too, but have Peter reject it mid-way through, it can slink off, and then Raimi could've left it out for another writer to deal with when the franchise inevitably continues (with different actors, likely). Except Marvel forced the issue and I'm beginning to hate their meddling (I know they're the production studio now starting with Iron Man, but did anyone see The Incredible Hulk ? Even at just under two hours, it feels like a third of the movie is missing and you can watch some of the trailers to catch a glimpse at the cut material).

What I liked best about Spider-Man 3 was that it finished off the Peter/Mary Jane/Harry storyline in a satisfying and emotionally resonant way. Despite the mess-ups with the villains, the strained friendship storyline still survived IMO and worked. All the same, I wasn't as pissed about any of the mess-ups in the Spider-Man franchise I'm less attatched to it than I was when they handed Brett Ratner X-Men 3, and SM feels like more of a popcorn picture overall.

I would much rather see Joss either concentrate on what he already has going on (Buffy Season 8, Dollhouse, Goners[?], maybe Angel Season 6 if I get around to reading it and like it enough to wish he was involved) or start something new (but not too huge, so it doesn't take away from those other projects).

Can't get it up for him on Spider-Man, heh.

I guess I just wished that comic book nerd fervor didn't dictate what projects open up to him and become the most appealing, which is how it seems like how it might happen the more he works with Marvel. I'm not gonna pick up Astonishing (maybe borrow some day), I wouldn't go near Spider-Man or Avengers or...well, maybe Hulk...all right, so I'm just as bad as any of 'em.

Kris | June 14, 18:40 CET

Of course Joss would be killer at writing Spiderman. Peter Parker is a slightly more confident Xander with super powers.

aus-mitch | June 15, 00:50 CET

It would have been more interesting to see him accidentally kill someone, or have to weigh personal benefit against the greater good.

I really liked the "fame going to his head" idea (it's realistic from a character perspective since a guy like Peter who'd never really had any attention would struggle to deal with it and it's also obviously a comment on celebrity culture and the fickleness of the media/public) and thought it could've worked well if they'd taken Dark-Pete more seriously. As it was, he was a buffoon and therefore not disturbing enough.

They'd already done power, control and abiding by the law in 1 and 2, that would've been re-treading the same ground IMO.

I guess I just wished that comic book nerd fervor didn't dictate what projects open up to him and become the most appealing, which is how it seems like how it might happen the more he works with Marvel.

I don't think that has much to do with it to be honest. Given how much "comic book nerd"s complain on the various fora it seems fairly clear that Marvel doesn't steer its ship based on what they think. Whichever book Joss takes (and my own suspicion is that he won't take any, certainly not as an ongoing commitment to one of the big two) there'll be people that unthinkingly hate the idea, people that unthinkingly love the idea and people that are willing to actually read it and see if he pulls it off. And all three groups will probably assume it'll be late ;).

Harry/Peter didn't quite survive the butler idiocy IMO - that's still one of the dumbest moments from the last 5 years of film - and Harry's redemption was signposted so obviously that there was absolutely no suspense as we see Spidey about to breathe his last.

Sandman was fine, didn't have any problems with him (except the silly retcon that he actually killed Uncle Ben - that works better in comics than films) and Thomas Hayden-Church gave a nice performance but there was no place for his story in the film they made IMO (or rather there was a place for it but not alongside the Venom/Dark Peter story).

Saje | June 15, 03:33 CET

Joss needs to write the Buffy-Batman crossover that he has teased us about in the past - because he already knows who wins in the fight! And I wanna know, too!

crossoverman | June 15, 04:46 CET

... because he already knows who wins in the fight!

The reader ;).

Saje | June 15, 04:56 CET

When I read X-Men, I was happy, because Nick Brendon was finally playing Peter Parker. He was sooooo Xander.

redeem147 | June 15, 07:14 CET

I assume Batman wins. Because Batman beats everybody. He even beat Superman. He'd figure something out to do about Buffy. Then they'd team up to beat the bad guy, as per crossover custom.

KingofCretins | June 15, 09:33 CET

While I'm sure that Joss would write a pretty great Spider-Man, I'd just as soon he stay away from the book during this "Brand New Day" phase. And actually, I've gotten the impression that he's done with writing for Marvel.

And, to compensate for the misspellings in this thread: Spider-Man. Spider-Man. Spider-Man. Spider-Man. Spider-Man. Spider-Man. Spider-Man. Spider-Man. Spider-Man. ;)

LKW | June 15, 11:54 CET

I've been meaning to read the rest of Joss' run on Astonishing X-Men (money got tight, so the only comics I must have are anything Buffy, Angel, or Serenity), and now that I know he's written Spidey...dear sweet mother of God.

Spider-Man will always be my single favorite comic book character, and I've said for years that Joss would do an absolutely amazing Spidey. The linked panels prove this. Good God. I am in love with Joss all over again.

UnpluggedCrazy | June 15, 13:25 CET

Are any of you "Brand New Day" complainants actually reading the book? Because, in spite of the strange way it got to this point, it's pretty damn brilliant. And to be honest I think this is a version of Spidey that Joss would be better suited to write...

daylight | June 16, 04:21 CET

Daylight--I've been reading ASM for quite some time now and its obvious to me that the PTB at Marvel wanted a change in the title that allows new readers to jump on at any time.

One of the big problems I have with BND is that to get there, Peter made an agreement with Mephisto. Peter Parker doesn't make deals with the devil. He beats the devil's ass. Or at least figures out a way to escape the fight to re-group.

Just like the recent fiasco with Wonder Woman this is unacceptable behavior from the webbed one. For those that are not familiar, WW killed a bad guy because he had the power to control Superman. In multi-panel slow motion, she snapped his neck in cold blood. For me, that's the equivalent of Buffy snapping Ethan Rayne's neck. It just doesn't happen.

alexreager | June 16, 09:12 CET

Surely this is a trick question. Plus he's superbusy with Dollhouse now. Clearly this would require some big advances in cloning technology.

Sunfire | June 16, 09:41 CET

This is, of course, the same Spider-Man who made deals with Kingpin and Venom. This is, of course, the same Spider-Man who allowed a burglar to pass him and go on to kill his Uncle Ben.

Spidey was never the guy who won every battle. He more often than not had to compromise in one way or another. I can't believe the number of supposed Spidey fans running around like headless chickens in the wake of the marriage's end. It's like they never read the Lee/Ditko originals.

What's most bizarre of all is that so many like yourself hold up the "One More Day" storyline as the reason why you're not reading the book, and yet there has not been any reference to the storyline whatsoever (outside of a single page in-joke) since it ended (and in all likelihood, given that it went down like a ton of bricks, will never be referred to again). Every memory about the pact made in that storyline has been erased from the lead character's head. It is effectively a clean slate. It's not even the same people writing the stories. So why the headless chickening?

daylight | June 16, 16:05 CET