New podcast interview with Nathan Fillion
conducted by Comic News Insider podcast co-host Jimmy. Topics covered in this lengthy interview include Nathan's career, current work, and more.
The discussion encompasses One Life to Live to Firefly to Lost and even his recent stint on Desperate Housewives. They also talk about the pilot Nathan is shooting here in NYC. They go over some proper fan etiquette, try to remember if they met back in 1994, and Nathan gives some great advice to all of you struggling actors out there.
June 14 2008
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Dietcoke | June 14, 22:38 CET
Anonymous1 | June 14, 22:44 CET
Teacherdarling | June 15, 04:10 CET
The One True b!X | June 15, 05:16 CET
shnoods | June 15, 05:23 CET
TamaraC | June 15, 07:11 CET
Teacherdarling | June 15, 08:14 CET
Anonymous1 | June 15, 12:30 CET
Nathan's mate's idea about story literacy and Joss ring true though of course, now we're starting to become familiar with the way Joss twists the conventions. I reckon he can twist the twists though, keep it real but the newer, sparklier real.
Can't believe people actually ask him that stuff at conventions. He's right there in front of you, a person actual and whole ! Would you ask a[nother] complete stranger to take his shirt off ? Weird.
Saje | June 15, 13:52 CET
i hold the mic close because that's the best way to get the sound through. unfortunately, nathan did not have the mic as close, thus the low sound on his end. apologies for that. and i really saw it more as a conversation than interview. as w/ that, people tend to jump in and "talk over". i listened to it again and dont think i really did that all that much.
anyway...all goood! hope people enjoy! :)
jimmy
host- COMIC NEWS INSIDER
jimmy x | June 15, 14:35 CET
Re: conversation, it's nice that you see it that way and I get that that was your aim, sort of a less formal approach, it's just that my own personal preference is for a simple question and answer format. I prefer written interviews to be carried out that way too (rather than the "answers embedded in prose" style that some people go for) since (no offence to your good self jimmy x ;) i'm generally much more interested in what the interviewee has to say than the interviewer (not saying I don't like relaxed, generally that's much better for both parties). Lots of folks prefer the other way though, just one of those varying mileage things.
Like I said though, nicely done in general, you'd clearly thought about the questions and got some interesting answers that I hadn't heard before.
Saje | June 15, 14:50 CET
as long as my podcast has been around, we've never been one to label ourselves "journalists". we do everything laid back and have fun with it. if you want a real interview, we're not for you. (and from your answer, we're not). we have conversations and do our best to make it fun for the interviewee. and the many many thank you emails/calls/etc i have gotten from said interviewees seems to tell me that is what they prefer. as they have told me how they get those same boring and stiff Q&A's all of the time.
still, valid point and all. and glad you did somewhat enjoy it. hope everyone else does as well. afterall, it's nathan! :)
jimmy x | June 15, 14:58 CET
A good (straightforward) interview doesn't need to be "boring and stiff" though, that's down to the manner employed and the questions asked (probably still my favourite Joss interviews are The Onion AV Club ones and they're straightforward Q&As). Or Rottentomatoes also do fairly relaxed, entertaining Q&A style interviews as another example (though in a relaxed context - IIRC a recent (ish) one with Edgar Wright took place over dinner).
(course, the line between styles is blurry anyway - you might well listen to their stuff and think "But that's exactly what we do" ;)
Re: proof, yeah, maybe a sworn affidavit if you could stretch to it ? Or if you happened to be measuring and recording your heartbeat and galvanic skin response at the time ... ? ;-). Like I say, perfectly happy to take your word for it ;).
Saje | June 15, 15:27 CET
RollingInKittens | June 15, 16:28 CET
embers | June 15, 21:21 CET
Thanks for awesome interview!
Anonymous1 | June 16, 05:31 CET
i clearly know people are there to hear the interviewee. nathan in this case. as previously mentioned, we had a conversation, not an interview. and hey, it was an hour long interview. :)
COMIC NEWS INSIDER is a pretty well respected podcast. are we professional? no. am i a journalist? no. but, we try to have fun and provide some interesting content and are always looking to improve. it's not about me, i realize. well, really...it probably is, but i know when to share the spotlight. ;)
thanks to everyone who listened and hopefully enjoyed it. and really, many thanks again to nathan as he made it all possible. :)
[ edited by jimmy x on 2008-06-16 11:32 ]
[ edited by jimmy x on 2008-06-16 11:32 ]
[ edited by jimmy x on 2008-06-16 11:50 ]
jimmy x | June 16, 14:27 CET
Those guys have had some great people on there for interviews- Whedonverse, Pushing Daisies cast, comic book folks, all kinds. Jimmy always seems to be able to get the best people on board. I highly suggest checking out some of the other episodes.
And lol. Not nerves. Not Jimmy. :D
mifeng | June 16, 16:54 CET
nakedandarticulate | June 16, 17:29 CET
I'll second that. Jimmy, while he jokes about not being a professional, approaches CNI in a much more professional manner than a lot of podcasts I've heard. He's had a lot of high-profile, Nathan-caliber people on his show (I have to learn your secret sometime, Jimmy) and "starstruck" is never a word I'd associate with him.
lexigeek | June 16, 19:39 CET
anyway...all good. im sure we'll have other famous type folk on in the future and with that, stuff like this will come. just gotta "Jay-Z" it and get the "dirt off my shoulder." :)
stay tuned!
p.s. co-host boosted the sound a bit, he said. so, hopefully that helped. of course, not in the loving my own voice department. :P :)
jimmy x | June 16, 23:00 CET