December 17
2008
(SPOILER)
Discuss Angel: After The Fall #15.
How will the huge cliffhanger from the last issue get resolved?
Simon
| AtS
| 15:21 CET
|
67 comments total
| tags: angel, after the fall, idw, brian lynch, joss whedon
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Doctor Horrible makes the cover of...
|
(SPOILER)
For the discussion of Buffy #20.
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
Angel was incredible in this issue. The fighting, the bringing his people together, and having a great idea of which he is actually capable of pretty often. The parallel between W&H's plan to change Angel, between the changes in Gunn as a vampire, and Illyria's attempts to "be" Fred was just brilliant, and actually makes every part of all their arcs for this series tie together very well.
We have the incredible disappearing, reappearing Nina again, but at least she's alive, so that's good.
I love that Betta George was sort of the key player in this, being able to access Illyria and use Wes and Spike's memories of her to set Illyria straight. Have to question creatively -- why Wes and Spike? Rather, why not just Wes? Or, if not just Wes, why not Angel, too? Angel knew her longer than Spike did. Should have been Wes or all three of them, IMO.
Groo went bravely, and I disagree -- he died with honor, defending the city from two attackers. I have to wonder, though, are their survivors of the NINSCVs*? Particularly Spider? We see her fighting, but not going down. Can we expect more of her?
Connor. Wow. I didn't cry when I read it, nor when I read it now. But I will. It was so sudden and so brutal to see him struck down by Gunn. I've gotta admit, I like Angel in this issue, but I don't *quite* get/agree with him not killing Gunn. If killing Gunn would prove that Angel is capable of being what W&H wants him to be, then so has every single vampire he's ever killed. So was killing Lawson in "Why We Fight". He already crossed the line that proves his capable of that when he killed Drogyn, I'd say. Killing Gunn isn't a character weakness. I went with it because it was clearly the plot element that connects for him and gives him his plan, but I question the premise behind it. Unless there's a sort of Jedi-like "don't kill in anger" idea behind it Lynch is going for, killing Gunn is just as okay as killing Russell Winters was. If anything, I've always been more creeped out by the people Angel's killed dispassionately -- Drogyn, Lindsey.
But Connor went out very bravely and very emotionally. It's a shame that Angel has to go on with that loss, it's horrible for him, but Connor made it okay. "Vampire or not... you're a good man". Man, isn't that what Angel's hoped to get from him since "A New World"? It was very sad but very touching.
KingofCretins | December 17, 17:48 CET
The Alpha Gamer | December 17, 18:08 CET
Groo and Connor, yes, although possible loss of Spider as well and some if not most if not all the other NINSCVs.
KingofCretins | December 17, 18:16 CET
Like I said,I hoped I was wrong.Brian did say over at the IDW board that,"the reason this one was hard goes beyond death. It's just really emotional." I can see why he said that based of how things sound.
I'll have my copy a little later today.
[ edited by Buffyfantic on 2008-12-17 18:36 ]
Buffyfantic | December 17, 18:23 CET
By the way, I call Wes and Gunn going down before the dust settles.
Oh, one final bit of randomness that I meantioned in a previous post. On Harmony's Myspace, Wolfram & Hart is listed under Companies. Is this a reference to the final season of Angel? Or is Harmony's reality show and the outing of vampires, demons and slayers W&H's doing? It could be nothing. There's a chance I'm over geeking it a bit.
JesusSavedIn01 | December 17, 18:41 CET
The Alpha Gamer | December 17, 19:21 CET
patxshand | December 17, 19:29 CET
KingofCretins | December 17, 19:36 CET
patxshand | December 17, 19:43 CET
Granted I felt the same way when Angel ended, yet Joss and Brian somehow managed to pull more fantastic character arcs out of their butts.
[ edited by JesusSavedIn01 on 2008-12-17 20:34 ]
JesusSavedIn01 | December 17, 20:33 CET
Emmie | December 17, 21:21 CET
KingofCretins | December 17, 21:34 CET
Emmie | December 17, 21:47 CET
RIP Connor
All I can say is Bravo Brian.
I didn't want Connor to die.I was dreading it coming since I've been suspecting it was on the way the last three weeks or so.Just something was giving me the feeling that this was going to be the big death in issues 15 after thinking about Brian's blog post from a while back.Connor dying would fit the bill perfectly.So I was expecting this and hoping I was off base.Sadly I was not.
But as much as I hate losing Connor who has become a favorite of mine,I have to give Brian props because he handled it so very well.It was given all the weight and power this deserved.And the emotion.Connor dying in Angel's arms and their last words to each other tore at the heartstrings.This is the worst loss Angel has ever suffered and probably ever will.No parent should have to watch their child die and right now,I just have know more words.
Brian has entered Joss level of tearing our hearts out.Connor's death here ranks up there with Buffy's in The Gift.And that final splash page echos Buffy's body being surrounded by her loved ones in The Gift to a tee.
I'll post more thoughts on the rest of this issue tomorrow probably because I need more time to digest.This whole issue was a slam dunk though.
Buffyfantic | December 17, 23:46 CET
embers | December 17, 23:56 CET
For starters, can I please say how glad I am to have Urru back. I have always felt his art is dynamic and gorgeous, and he doesn't disappoint. Indeed, the colors look great, as well. Specifically, for some reason Groo's flaming sword drew my eye in every panel it appeared.
I am kind of disappointed Angel didn't kill Gunn. I dunno if that rang true, but, knowing Brian, it was the right choice.
As far as the two deaths, I'm upset, not because it was a poor story choice, but because I loved both characters. Groo was always adorably naive and heroic. Connor's passing is even more upsetting. I have loved him since his first appearance in season five. He'll be missed.
Good work Brian and Urru! Can't wait to see how it wraps up!
CowboyCliche | December 18, 00:49 CET
Invisible Green | December 18, 00:59 CET
korkster | December 18, 01:06 CET
This was my immediate response to getting the spoilers. I still haven't read the issue, but I will soon. So, without having read the issue, this was my brain earlier today:
Nuh. Buh.
NOT CONNOR!
Oh, this just ruined my day. And Angel's. I think it was a mistake. There is so much left to do with the character.
And I agree (...this was a response to King of Cretins...). I think Lynch's Spike-love is coming out a little too much in having Wesley and Spike being the memories used for Illyria. Angel was the one who saved Fred in Pylea, after all. "Handsome man saved me from the monsters." I think that was also a mistake.
Either just use Wesley (way more poignant) or use everyone. Angel has a much more poignant and longer history with Fred than Spike, no matter how much time Spike spent with Illyria. Angel saved Fred. Wesley would still have been the choice I'd have used (much like Xander and Willow in Grave).
It better not have felt safe to kill Connor because of his formerly low popularity levels. There better be a big payoff for doing that to Angel. Remember Forgiving?
It's one thing to kill all of Angel's friends, but quite another to kill the only family he will likely ever have. Puts new meaning to the cover of Angel burning up for me. One of the reasons he seemed to most want becoming human was having a family (going back to the days where he told Buffy about the things he couldn't give her). As a vampire, he got a son and as a human, he got his son--the only flesh and blood offspring he'll ever have--taken away. IMO, that's the worst possible thing that could have happened to Angel. Nothing else that has happened to Angel in the franchise comes close for me (and that's a lot of bad luck to beat).
Connor: They'll destroy you.
Angel: As long as you're okay, they can't.
[ edited by NileQT87 on 2008-12-18 02:15 ]
NileQT87 | December 18, 02:13 CET
[ edited by phlebotinin on 2008-12-18 02:35 ]
phlebotinin | December 18, 02:30 CET
DaddyCatALSO | December 18, 02:32 CET
CowboyCliche | December 18, 02:34 CET
Connor. Angel's connection with humanity. How is he going to feel? Technically, Connor's death is Angel's fault in many ways. Is he going to see it this way?
I get why Angel didn't kill Gunn. He would be killing for revenge, not justice or for what's right. The more important thing was to stop Illyria. But holy crap. Ugh. I cannot believe this. Angel's son. How is he going to live through this?
Giles_314 | December 18, 02:38 CET
Doesn't make it any less tragic of course. Connor was quite likeable in the series. And since it turns out that Angel really can't escape losing Connor, the heavy price paid by everyone else (Fred, Gunn, Wesley) weighs all the more, since it really was all in vain.
Maggie | December 18, 02:40 CET
Indeed there's an essay waiting to be written about whether After the Fall has anything at all in common with the TV series at its most basic level - if the show was often a dimly-lit elaboration of Holland Manners's elevator-ride point that evil is in everyone and can't be expunged or reversed by any means, the comic has often felt a little too histrionic, too desperate...too many climaxes, not enough actual living. The Buffy comic is impressively mundane at times, particularly in the opening issues but in the romantic/growing-up arcs (Satsu, Dawn, Willow/Kennedy) as well. There hasn't been a single moment in the whole of AtF that hasn't been Big! Comics! Action! And over time it's gone from an interesting setup - Angel/Deadwood crossover in hell - to a climax that's of course all about our heroes, and that's fine, but in which the other millions of residents of Los Angeles seem to matter not one iota. Near as I could tell Illyria was killing demons and smashing empty buildings - I couldn't help wondering what was the difference, why any of it mattered at all.
(Which is, along with everything else, to reiterate my long-running complaint that any comic that so utterly short-changes Angel's transformation back into a human being is an absolute waste of time and effort, no matter how plotty it is.)
Right now I'm enjoying the Illyria plot more than any other part of this series, but...um, haven't we seen an all-powerful Buffyverse female try to 'end suffering' by destroying the world? Oh man, I couldn't stop thinking of that fucking yellow crayon.
But.
Yeah, I've enjoyed the last two issues more than the rest of the series by a wide margin. If this work hasn't quite breathed like the show, has seemed to lack the 'incidental' (i.e. secretly central) humanity that characterized the TV series, it's still gong out nicely. And I'm absolutely certain it'll read a million times better in a single sitting than it has month to month. I look forward to giving Brian his full credit when it's all done.
waxbanks | December 18, 03:32 CET
cheryl | December 18, 03:44 CET
Groo. I don't think he's dead, and if he is, his last words really summed it up. Totally unglamorous.
ATF has really sucked me into this issue by issue hope and fear concerning Angel's destiny. Great work, me thinks.
RebelAt | December 18, 03:54 CET
Whoa.
That was amazing. "-Cue the music" indeed. I think that we just officially saw what happened in the alley. (Yes, I'm aware that we officially saw what happened months ago)
So, yeah, well done. Couldn't be happier, really. I never liked Connor. He always just kind of messed everything up. He was the monkey wrench in the cogs. So, yay? I know that's mean but. Yay. I'm sadder about Groo. Not to say that the scene wasn't beautifully written or drawn (or inked or colored).
And, at the risk of gushing TOO much, special shout out to Franco for the panel on page 4 of Lorne looking up at the... black hole sun, maybe? I stared at that panel for a long time. Just beuatiful.
leafblown | December 18, 05:07 CET
I'm not sure how I feel about Connor's death. On the one hand, I understand how it works in having to pay for the consequences of Angel's decision. But on the other hand, Connor was the one bright shining message of the entire series. Even when he was trying to kill Angel in the past, his life was still sacred. Connor was Angel's hope. To lose Connor, Fred, (human)Gunn *and* Cordelia in one year's span of time? Dear god. Perhaps we shouldn't let Angel fight with any overly sharp objects at the moment? I'm a bit worried he might slit his wrists.
waxbanks, I've been a bit worried by the extremely darker trend of After the Fall. The most notable difference for me between it and the show is the absence of hope from these actions. Connor just was the final nail in that coffin. A part of me is still hopeful that some narrative curve ball is waiting for us up ahead.
Emmie | December 18, 05:12 CET
Jeez, his SON. Still can't get over that.
Giles_314 | December 18, 05:17 CET
menomegirl | December 18, 05:43 CET
LOST LOVE CARE BEAR STARE! In 3...2...
Emmie | December 18, 06:09 CET
Maggie | December 18, 06:18 CET
embers | December 18, 06:30 CET
menomegirl | December 18, 06:36 CET
patxshand | December 18, 06:37 CET
But the fact still remains. Angel had only one shot at having a family. He continuously made references about what he couldn't have/give and his desire for a family starting way back in Bad Eggs, The Prom and War Zone. It was almost poetic that he had a child, because it was always the one thing he always assumed he could never have, which probably made him want it all the more; both for him and others. He seemed to often wish his desires for others. I think his speeches about his vision for Buffy's normal life spoke more about what he wanted than what she wanted.
As I quoted, Angel explicitly stated that Connor's death would destroy him in Not Fade Away. Now, I expect to see just that. This is the man who would give up anything (including himself and his friends) or do any dark magic regardless of consequences to save his son. It doesn't feel right to me if he doesn't.
NileQT87 | December 18, 06:50 CET
I get that for a lot of people (Patxshand) Angel is just a hero to whom bad things happen. But that's just not the show I watched. And I actually think it takes away from Angel as a character to deny that a lot of what happens to him is a result of his own actions. It's one thing to overcome external bad things. It's another to confront one's own tragic flaws. Angel has never been able to overcome himself; but he's never stopped trying either. To me that's what makes him great. It's also why I think he has a chance to survive the loss of Connor and go on.
Maggie | December 18, 07:12 CET
[ edited by patxshand on 2008-12-18 07:25 ]
patxshand | December 18, 07:23 CET
The role of the Trial and of Jasmine in Connor's existence are not mutually exclusive. Both are textually true. Jasmine set all the events in motion *which included* Angel winning the life that was paid off in the form of Connor in "The Trial".
KingofCretins | December 18, 08:06 CET
Emmie | December 18, 09:19 CET
I'm not surprised that Wes suggested using Spike's memories also. Spike and Fred had become good friends with each other during Season 5 and Illyria also had a bond with Spike, as well as with Wes. Wes and Spike were the two that were the closest to Illyria and who were also close to, and loved, Fred. Angel and Illyria did not have that connection. Therefore, to me, the impact of Wes' and Spike's feelings about and connections to Fred would resonate with Illyria more than Angel's emotions.
I agree with all the other posters that during this series I had really grown to like Connor. His character was well developed and his passing very sad. However, I don't see Connor's death tipping Angel over to the evil side, especially not after Connor's last words. If Angel had enough self-control to stop himself from killing Gunn in a rage, then he won't allow himself to dishonor Connor, Connor's last request, and Connor's good opinion, by turning evil. It may very well be Connor's death that keeps Angel on his redemptive path.
I disagree with the statements that Connor is Angel's only chance to have a child. That was true when Angel was a vampire. However, right now, Angel is still a human and who knows what will happen in the future. Admittedly, it's not looking good right now and there is a better than even chance that Angel will become a vampire again, but as a human he can have another child. Just to be clear - I'm not saying that having another or the ability to have another child makes Angel's grief over Connor any less. Just adding my two cents to earlier comments.
I'm surprised that no one's commented on the apparent demise of Illyria! I loved that character and there were so many potential stories to tell. I'm holding out hope that W&H forces don't kill her/it, but only subdue her/it. After all, Illyria was the most feared Old One during its original reign, surely it can hold its own against these forces W&H had amassed for this fight. (I say with hope.)
A shout out of my love for Betta George. He got to have a hero moment. I love the interaction between Betta George and Spike. Want to see more.
[ edited by MacGuffin on 2008-12-18 10:02 ]
MacGuffin | December 18, 09:46 CET
Man I actually have a pain in my heart...poor Angel!
angeliclestat | December 18, 13:02 CET
Simon | December 18, 13:29 CET
Now Connor's gone, and I have no idea what's going to happen now.
Giles_314 | December 18, 15:31 CET
angeliclestat | December 18, 18:24 CET
Simon | December 18, 18:27 CET
angeliclestat | December 18, 18:39 CET
Simon | December 18, 19:02 CET
DaddyCatALSO | December 18, 19:03 CET
Craig Oxbrow | December 18, 20:26 CET
Those are my only thoughts right now.
Also, after the first five issues (that I found a bit wonky), Angel: ATF has really turned into one of my favourite comic book series. It's really awesomely good now. Only two issues left!
Riker | December 18, 21:15 CET
Oh. crap.
korkster | December 18, 22:34 CET
The trustworthiness of the narrator doesn't actually enter my analysis unless there are other contextual clues that he's lying. Since Season 4 of "Angel" never raised any real challenge to Skip's explanation in the storyline, there's no reason not to believe him, since he is the means by which the audience is being given the metaphysics of the story.
My only point was that arguing whether Connor was made by Jasmine's agenda OR Angel in "The Trial" is irrelevant, since they aren't mutually exclusive explanations.
KingofCretins | December 18, 22:45 CET
My thinking is just the opposite: Any information given by a specific character could be a lie, or the character could've misunderstood something. You're not hearing the truth, you're hearing the character's perspective. Omniscient narration or prose, on the other hand, can be accepted as truth.
Invisible Green | December 18, 23:00 CET
I've had this argument relentlessly about Andrew's role in "Damage" (I'm not having it again on this thread), and I could apply it to any number of other issues, and its universal -- The information you get, even from the bad guys, that clarifies the metaphysical rules of the Buffyverse or the plot of the story is trustworthy without some other clue to suggest it isn't. At the very least, if something was important enough for the plot to lie about (Andrew's orders, Skip's explanation), the subject will be *brought up again* at some point. What Skip said about Jasmine was never brought up or challenged in the text that season, the next season, or in "After the Fall". So I ask -- if Joss was putting the creative effort into making that a lie, why never expose it as such? It follows that if it's never exposed as a lie, there is no narrative reason for it to have *been* a lie, therefore, it's probably not a lie.
KingofCretins | December 18, 23:11 CET
One very important lie in the 'verse was Xander saying "kick his ass" to Buffy in Becoming. The audience knew he was lying, it had a purpose. And it even had a little more payoff later on as Goddard brought it back in Season 7's Selfless.
Emmie | December 19, 00:45 CET
Pat: apologies if I took you the wrong way. My bad.
Maggie | December 19, 01:13 CET
DaddyCatALSO | December 19, 01:17 CET
Like many, I really started to warm to Connor this season. I've never disliked him, but he was never exactly one of my favorite characters. After the Fall, though, gave him a huge boost (much in the same way that Buffy S8 has elevated Dracula's stature). I like how Spike was the first at Connor's side. And Angel's narration: "World's going to end. World HAS JUST ended."
"Vampire or not--you're a good man."
Fuck.
UnpluggedCrazy | December 21, 08:16 CET
Angel, Spike, Wesley, Lorne, Gunn, Nina... that is everyone right? Unless you count Kate (which I don't) and only-seems-to-appear-to-the-dying-is-she-still-a-higher-power(?)-Cordelia (again, not really).
Angel, Lorne and Nina are our only alive characters. And I kind of don't really care about Nina. Gunn will surely get the chop by the end of the series, and it seems unlikely that Wesley will be able to re-enter his body. Angel is going to have to be re-vamped and re-souled at some point.
I am not feeling the love this issue. Mr. Lynch, can't you put something happy in the next few issues? Maybe a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow? Euphoria educing medication of some kind...
Another interesting sidenote... Will re-souled Angel still have the pesky true happiness clause that tends to go with a soul? Depends how they do it I suppose. I vote no on the gypsy style.
Vortigun | December 25, 01:36 CET
DaddyCatALSO | December 26, 23:12 CET
Brett | December 27, 03:32 CET
John Darc | December 27, 04:14 CET
menomegirl | December 27, 05:22 CET
I mean, I actually really liked less-annoying Connor much more than hates-the-world-Connor and was sad to see him die.
But ILLYRIA??
Is she/it really, truly gone?
Please say it isn't so!!!!
CarpeNoctem | December 30, 06:54 CET
I do agree that almost everything was (is) Angel's fault. He should have had more strength (not only physical, but also emotional) to hold Connor back in season 4, so maybe this could be avoided. He was stupid enough to take W&H and believe he could do any good out of it... there is no good in evil.
And I always suspected of Cordy's "last present". Angel receives her visions, and then he has one revelation and decides to go against W&H, black thorn. That always sound strange do me. It should have been clear to him that doing so would cause everyone's torment, not only his one. Angel went completely wrong at that point. After he knew that Connor knew about him, he should have called off his vendetta.
For someone who spent too much time trying to do the best for everyone around him, being so selfless, he was completely reckless, even selfish. Angel being reckless = bad things = your city going to hell (pretty much like Buffy and Apocalypses = something being blow up). I know he could not go back since the show was canceled and Joss wanted was to suffer together with him (:) :) :)).
Besides, lies are never good and he should have known it. Buffy lied about going to a party and ended up almost eaten by a giant snake... after that she lied about his existence when he came back from hell and he almost got killed by Faith... so he really had examples of what lies can do... Sooner or later lies come to get you.
I tend to disagree about the Holtz thing, since back then it was not Angel, but Angelus. But, then, Holtz was clearly a mad man still grieving his family... and wanting to punish someone... even if the shell of the beast that caused him so much pain.
I also think there are a lot of wasted words in all Skip said. I mean, for everything to happen the way we saw, even Angel being turned would be a plot of Jasmine… even Darla. Buffy going to Sunnydale, they falling in love, him losing his soul, going to hell, coming back, Mayor’s stupid speech, mommy visiting him, leaving SunnyHell, … yada yada yada. Didn’t Illyria say the same thing about herself? Did not she also plan her resurrection? Does not it mean she was the one planning everything… if there was no Jasmine, there would not be a crazy Connor, and no motive for Angel to make a deal with W&H, no Fred in their place for Knox to use?
I also do understand, although can't accept, that Angel did not kill Gunn. Maybe he did not process the fact that Gunn is crazy. The Gunn he knew is gone... just as much as Fred in Illyria. Maybe he felt guilt about killing him, since his downfall will be always in his back, just as Wes and Fred.
But, yeah... Connor’s death was hard. I mean, Angel always thought of himself as someone not worth of love, but still he had Buffy’s and Cordy’s love. But, as everyone said, he thought that children were the thing he could not really have… and he really could not. No matter how he came to be, it was still his son. It still pains me the way he looked through the window of Connor’s “house” in the end of season 4. He was again giving up something important for the greater good: first Buffy and his idea of a normal life for her, and then a normal life for his son (he should really stop thinking about give someone a normal life… every time he tries the person end up dead). The boy went from a murderous teen to a fully grown caring guy. They were developing some bonding and then... well, we know.
Poor Angel!
PS1.: Sorry for the English, but I’m not native, so
PS2: THEY KILLED CONNOR AND ILLYRIA! BASTARDS!!
[ edited by Angeluffy on 2009-01-04 10:57 ]
Angeluffy | January 04, 10:55 CET