January 07 2009
'The Cabin in The Woods' shooting in March says Joss.
And find out more about his meeting with Tom Cruise.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


The One True b!X | January 07, 10:06 CET
Okay, so explain to me something about the timeline. Let's say it takes them two months to shoot (I would think it'd take less, but I'm not sure about these things). That puts them into June. I have no idea how long it would take them to edit it. But it seems like this film is going to spend a lot of time sitting there, finished, waiting to be released if it doesn't come out until February 2010. Am I right, or is there something that happens in that time that I haven't taken into consideration?
sumogrip | January 07, 10:26 CET
Lockescythe | January 07, 10:31 CET
The One True b!X | January 07, 11:02 CET
Between this and "Dollhouse", I'm really looking forward to this year. Yah!!
Madhatter | January 07, 11:15 CET
Well, it depends on how much post-production work it needs (effects shots etc.) but it's not at all unusual for a film to be completed and then held purely to fit in with a release schedule (and it's actually reasonably common for even huge films to be rushing around like blue arsed flies trying to get everything done at the last minute, also to meet a release schedule - 'Twilight' was completely finished about 3 weeks before it was released, basically just in time for prints to be made and distributed, and IIRC 'Quantum of Solace' was similar).
Deciding release dates is a bit of a black art as far as I can tell but it's sometimes strategic (i.e. who would you be up against, do you need to release to meet the Oscar nomination requirements etc.) and sometimes just a way of dumping a film the studio doesn't want to promote.
Saje | January 07, 11:20 CET
The One True b!X | January 07, 11:22 CET
Let Down | January 07, 12:27 CET
Dana5140 | January 07, 13:45 CET
Let Down | January 07, 13:49 CET
wiesengrund | January 07, 13:53 CET
GVH | January 07, 14:08 CET
And yeah, the "literally" leapt out at me back when we first saw that quote. But many people use literally when they don't literally mean literally (and even if it means it's somehow purporting to be a sort of final comment on the genre, it still won't be literally true since people will obviously continue to make horror movies afterwards - unless Joss means the film will kick-start an apocalypse, in which case I hope it gets a simultaneous global release so I can see it too ;).
So in this case, I would think he will somehow ramp up the dread.
That isn't subverting the horror genre in any way (and there're still horror movies being made that aren't torture porn, I liked 'The Orphanage' from last year for instance).
Saje | January 07, 14:17 CET
[ edited by Dana5140 on 2009-01-07 14:41 ]
Dana5140 | January 07, 14:40 CET
(and here's a scary observation - to me - 'The Blair Witch Project' is ten years old this year ! Tempus seems very fugity right now ;)
Thinking about it, i'd speculate (and that's all it is, I haven't counted anything ;) that there are many more slasher/survival horror movies released annually than torture-porn, that's still the dominant sub-genre in horror IMO - I think torture-porn just gets more press (it's a relatively new hobby horse for people to ride). True though, psychological horror/suspense has, in the last few decades, been very much on the back foot quantity wise.
Saje | January 07, 14:53 CET
What are they shooting for? Making your Valentine scream in fear and turning to you for comfort...actually, that might work.
Emmie | January 07, 14:56 CET
I know it'll be good but please don't end the whole genre! I would like to have been a fly on the wall during that meeting.
Tonya J | January 07, 15:00 CET
Simon | January 07, 15:03 CET
It just occurred to me that Tom Cruise has never been in a horror movie. Has he? Am I forgetting something?
jenlight | January 07, 15:03 CET
wiesengrund | January 07, 15:06 CET
I would like to have been a fly on the wall during that meeting.
Studio: "OK, Mr Sweden, we're happy to finance your literal horror movie to end all horror movies provided you can provide a return of ... ooh, the box office gross of every horror movie that would have been made between now and the end of time".
Joss: "Yah-sure-yabetcha.".
It just occurred to me that Tom Cruise has never been in a horror movie. Has he? Am I forgetting something?
'Interview With a Vampire' ?
And opinions vary about 'Far and Away'.
Saje | January 07, 15:09 CET
Also: Event Horizon in a hut? Totally wouldn't watch that. (But then, I'm a low-on-blood-and-gore type of guy ;)).
GVH | January 07, 15:20 CET
(also, 'Event Horizon' was [a bit] like Die Hard in a spaceship ergo TCitW is like Die Hard in a spaceship in a hut - which i'd actually watch)
Saje | January 07, 15:24 CET
A couple of things spring to mind. First, the horror genre has ALWAYS been really self-conscious. even if its (mainstream) audience has not. One could argue that "Scream" was "the horror movie to end all horror movies," since it was all meta- (though it was received, essentially, as a revitalization of horror movies, even though it deconstructed them pretty thoroughly).
Second, if I were to guess what that enigmatic phrase meant coming from Joss, I would think that it meant that TCiTW was going to set out to deconstruct or subvert or reverse or put the lie to all the horror genre conventions, turning the genre on its head and maybe pointing out its ridiculous conventions (sort of like Scream, but less wink-at-the-camera and more here's-what-it-would-really-be-like or here's-what-it-could-be-like). After all, Joss has kind of a history of turning horror conventions on their heads! And, if it contains a powerful condemnation of torture-porn at the same time, so much the better.
[ edited by Septimus on 2009-01-07 16:03 ]
Septimus | January 07, 16:03 CET
GVH | January 07, 16:13 CET
In the sense that I'm a bit like Alexander the Great.
Simon | January 07, 16:16 CET
(head, eyes, ears, arms, legs ... you're the spitting image of him Simon ;)
Saje | January 07, 16:19 CET
GVH | January 07, 16:24 CET
zeitgeist | January 07, 16:56 CET
That should have told him right there he was in big trouble...
Tonya J | January 07, 16:57 CET
[ edited by zeitgeist on 2009-01-07 16:59 ]
zeitgeist | January 07, 16:58 CET
Tonya J | January 07, 17:06 CET
zeitgeist | January 07, 17:08 CET
Tonya J | January 07, 17:23 CET
Emmie | January 07, 17:35 CET
jpr | January 07, 18:09 CET
Sunfire | January 07, 18:10 CET
hacksaway | January 07, 18:52 CET
snot monster from outer space | January 07, 19:20 CET
Now THAT I'd pay to see.
Snot Monster, it's well known that Joss is a big fan of musical theatre and Sondheim, so you have good suspicions. Cabin in the Woods is to Into the Woods as The Company of Wolves is to fairy tales, I suspect.
Tonya J | January 07, 20:06 CET
snot monster from outer space | January 07, 20:21 CET
hacksaway | January 07, 20:28 CET
josswhedonaddict | January 07, 21:11 CET
Well, there was the Buffy episode by that name (S5, Ep. 10)...
I'm thrilled Joss and Drew are doing horror for the silver
screamscreen. Blood and guts could use some brains for a change! (Insert zombie joke here) And did anyone see "Let the Right One In"? Stately, scary, beautiful and with some unforgettable images -- my favorite movie experience of this (admittedly short) year so far.Wiseblood | January 07, 22:37 CET
Yep. That's what I meant by "and once, of course, a title." By "specific mention" I mean "Joss specifically mentioning how important Sondheim's Into the Woods was to him."
snot monster from outer space | January 07, 22:42 CET
phong | January 07, 22:51 CET
Drew Goddard:
The One True b!X | January 07, 22:57 CET
Me too, Saje. Me too.
Of course, Joss in a room with Tom Cruise could be its own apocalypse right there. It definitely never entered my scope of possible situations.
I'm so excited! This movie will allow me to convert my friend who loves the black & white horror films. This would be a perfect introduction into the Whedonverse. :)
And it looks like we might have a gap in the fall for more mushortios/balletios!
korkster | January 08, 02:12 CET
Well, you know, hopefully Dollhouse is back in production by then, also. Heh.
The One True b!X | January 08, 02:14 CET
Side note: I've never understood the "heh" statement. It seems as if my comment gives a negative enough vibe (even though I was shooting for positive) to deserve a "heh". Anyone care to explain these?
korkster | January 08, 03:20 CET
SmileTime | January 08, 10:47 CET
The One True b!X | January 08, 11:05 CET
Saje | January 08, 11:38 CET
J.I.G. | January 08, 15:04 CET
Simon | January 08, 15:07 CET
ETA - Simon hit post while I was scratching my nose - he wins!
[ edited by zeitgeist on 2009-01-08 15:07 ]
zeitgeist | January 08, 15:07 CET
J.I.G. | January 08, 15:10 CET
Dude, 'Die Hard' was totally set on a space-ship. You just didn't actually, y'know, see it. Like with Dark City (<-- see, now you wont know if this particular spoiler is safe to look at untill you've actually looked at it. In which case it'll be too late. *universe implodes*)
ETA: yikes, why is that inviso-text space so huge?
ETFA: thanks, Simon
[ edited by GVH on 2009-01-08 15:24 ]
[ edited by GVH on 2009-01-08 15:26 ]
GVH | January 08, 15:24 CET
Simon | January 08, 15:25 CET
Saje | January 08, 16:35 CET
Tonya J | January 08, 17:00 CET
(they seem to be going for a sort of encapsulation to some extent, a blanket statement, so it makes sense they'd use a trope that's woven throughout the genre. Implicit in 'cabin' is isolation and, for a social species, that's the foundations of a horror story right there)
Saje | January 08, 17:10 CET
Tonya J | January 08, 18:12 CET