January 15 2009
James Marsters' January Q+A.
This month's topics include: Recording audio books, audition techniques, Hollywood barriers, choosing a guitar and why cows are better than magic beans.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Simon | January 15, 22:51 CET
JotheCat | January 15, 23:05 CET
DaddyCatALSO | January 15, 23:08 CET
http://www.jamesdb.com/
I went too far into the Method playing Spike. It really burned me frankly... The Method is really applicable to mostly film and film alone. The Method really it… in simple terms, the Method is just developing a fantasy life that you can release into and improvise within… and it's not so good for stage because for stage you have to tell a story and there's a large part of your brain that has to be aware of what plot points you have to get in, what pace is, if you hear rustling outside… and when I've worked with actors who try to do the Method on stage, it's been really frustrating. I'm like, (funny voice) "Hellooo, I'm glad you're FEELING so much but there are people out there who want to hear a story." But it works wonderfully for film because film wants to document something actually happening for the first time. It doesn't want a recreation of the actual event, it wants the ACTUAL event and it will catch you lying. So in my mind, the Method is the ONLY good acting technique for film. And for television, it's just problematic. On television because you're in it for six years, and it will eat you alive. So I was playing a character who was a metaphor for hunger and it ate me alive quite frankly… but I'm back. I'm okay. {on stage}You lose the audience, you lose your responsibility to the other actors, you lose your responsibility to the playwright and you just become engulfed in your own sensation. And that’s great for film but it just doesn’t work for stage. … I think.
[ edited by debw on 2009-01-15 23:18 ]
debw | January 15, 23:17 CET
Simon | January 15, 23:27 CET
Xane | January 16, 16:31 CET
debw | January 16, 17:33 CET