(SPOILER)
Dollhouse review at Star Ledger.
Alan Sepinwall reviews the first four episodes of Dollhouse. The review is mixed, as we've come to expect.
And don't forget Alan Sepinwall's interview with Joss, which was mentioned by an earlier thread.
[ edited by zach on 2009-02-11 23:10 ]
[ edited by zach on 2009-02-12 03:15 ]
February 11 2009
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Also, I'm sorry for being the guy demanding spoiler warnings on everything ... but doesn't this qualify? I had to jump over the bits where it discussed episode plots and characters' past and quoted dialogue
Let Down | February 11, 23:02 CET
zach | February 11, 23:12 CET
Let Down | February 11, 23:21 CET
jighooligan101 | February 11, 23:51 CET
I'm really hoping that the early episodes work to pull in the viewers that aren't Joss fans, and that all the Joss fans decided to stick through the first half if they don't love it. Though I guess a lot of them will be brought back in fairly easily if they're told it got a lot better.
Then again, Dollhouse could just be mediocre all the way through. Though I'm doubting that.
Racoon Boy | February 12, 00:03 CET
Nebula1400 | February 12, 00:26 CET
I for one have enough faith in Joss that when he says that the first half of the season has its problems, but they're hitting their stride in the second part, he's telling the truth. Plus, Joss - pretty good writer. Even with nagging executives he should be able to push out something good, as should the other members of the writing staff. This isn't the first time they've been round the block, after all.
But the question if the show would've been better had Fox not gotten involved? That's something we'll never actually get an answer to. Barring the original pilot script, that is, and that's only an indication at best. I'm currently kinda scared that if large parts of the fandom end up disliking the first few episodes, we'll have a massive "we hate Fox"-party (please note that I'm not singling you out, Nebula1400, or even directly replying to you anymore, it's just that your comment sparked this line of thought :)). That's something I'm not looking forward to. It also wouldn't be honest, because in the end it's not just Fox that makes the show. If it ends up being great, we won't be giving them credit, but if it ends up bad, we'll bring on the hate-fest... doesn't seem very fair.
As for me? I'm not picnicking (It's just too damned cold for a picnick). I'm assuming the show won't start out great (as Joss' words and early reviews seem to indicate that), but not bad either. Just different from what we're used to from Joss in both style and - maybe, maybe not - quality.
If the show does end up being 'meh': so be it. If it ends up great: all the better! Let's just all wait and see. The premiere is nearly upon us, after all. Time to be excited, instead of the other thing.
GVH | February 12, 00:48 CET
Not to defend the 'suits' or anything, but most of the ‘mixedness’ in this particular review lies along the familiar lines of ‘we’re not sure we’re buying the premise’, ‘we’re not sure we can sufficiently identify with a “clean slate”’ and ‘we’re not sure Eliza can pull it off’.
[ edited by Effulgent on 2009-02-12 01:05 ]
Effulgent | February 12, 01:01 CET
So, the ads may attract new viewers, like my brother. I just hope that the first episode doesn't drive people away. If it intrigues people even a little, hopefully they will give it a shot for a week or two longer.
palehorse | February 12, 01:08 CET
Dana5140 | February 12, 02:23 CET