February 12 2009
R-Prime Lab website live.
It's an official alternative reality game (ARG) for Dollhouse they're shooting day-to-day, so fan reaction determines the outcome. It's all kinds of wacky.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


That's funny.
JMaloney | February 12, 19:33 CET
The One True b!X | February 12, 19:46 CET
snot monster from outer space | February 12, 19:52 CET
gossi | February 12, 19:54 CET
BrownCoat_Tabz | February 12, 19:56 CET
Simon | February 12, 19:56 CET
I can't see how that doesn't imply that the FAQ is supposedly written in 1999.
ETA: I mean, if it read "In 1999 the number of imprint-tests will exceed 4000" then it could just be the "historic present"--but with 'projected' in there the "historic present" would only make sense if they "projected" that many, and then didn't actually do that many...and why not simply tell us that? Why not tell us what happened in any of the years subsequent to 1999?
[ edited by snot monster from outer space on 2009-02-12 20:28 ]
snot monster from outer space | February 12, 20:24 CET
The One True b!X | February 12, 20:27 CET
Also, the video's don't seem to be working for me. Anyone else having that problem?
GVH | February 12, 20:30 CET
True enough...though what point, exactly, is served by providing a fictional framework that suggests that the website is horribly maintained I'm not sure. Perhaps it's just to provide a sense of historic depth? "We all know this has been around for ages." But if it has been around for ages, why are they still running these "tests"? Ten years later and they test protocol hasn't changed at all? That seems weird.
snot monster from outer space | February 12, 20:30 CET
My current theory: it's an inmates-running-the-asylum kind of thing, or an automated-processes-running-themselves kind of thing. The r-prime mnema program is some sort of precursor to the Dollhouse (using volunteers, apparently), that was (supposed to be?) shut down as it was getting started in 1999. Hazel has wandered into it in the present and somehow it's still going (whether completely automated or through the interference of hackers or something).
(Think Losties coming across what's left of the Dharma initiative, kind of thing.)
[ edited by Septimus on 2009-02-12 21:50 ]
Septimus | February 12, 21:45 CET
I noticed an interesting thing when I played video #3--up on the top left of the video box was a kind of aphorism: "memory itself is an internal rumour"--a quote from George Santayana. I wonder if the fact that they spelled "rumour" in the non-US way means anything (or if that was just the way they pulled the quote from Google...).
ETA: that same quotation seems to feature on all the video screens.
[ edited by snot monster from outer space on 2009-02-12 21:59 ]
snot monster from outer space | February 12, 21:58 CET
Jaymii | February 12, 22:48 CET
Or, to put it another another way, what do all those memories that are stored on hard drives (apparently) do when they are not implanted in actives? Or, what if you extracted the memories from someone (say, some sort of founder of the Dollhouse) and put them in a sufficiently complex computer? And then (in full fan wank mode), what if that computer were running the experiments and/or the Dollhouse itself?
Also, grammatical question. Are the institution/company and the place called "Dollhouse" or "the Dollhouse?"
Septimus | February 12, 23:00 CET
I don't think that I want Dollhouse to go down that road, though. I think the underlying metaphorical implications of the story would get too messy.
Also: I'm going to assume that a self-conscious computer mind would tidy up that out-of-date FAQ page! (Today: Became conscious. Current mood: Megalomaniacal.)
snot monster from outer space | February 12, 23:14 CET
As to the AI point, it's possible I guess. We currently don't have "sufficiently complex" computers (in fact I dunno what it would even mean to "run" a memory, seems a bit chicken/egg-ish in that the memories make a personality but there has to be something there in the first place to "have" the memories - which is presumably one of the things the show looks at) but then we also don't have consciousness imprinting machines either.
That said, thematically it feels more resonant to have a person in charge to me, if you put an AI in charge you're putting the baddie at one remove. Also, "an evil AI" isn't exactly a brand new idea either.
(the disclaimer page features a paragraph in small print about forgetting BTW though it's unattributed so possibly not a quotation. It goes "The existence of forgetting has never been proved. We only know that some things don't come to mind when we want them.")
ETA: There's a forum post up now too. Have at it, people who can be bothered ;).
[ edited by Saje on 2009-02-12 23:18 ]
Saje | February 12, 23:15 CET
ETA: all the little aphorisms about memory seem to be quotations from various famous people. I'm guessing someone popped open a Dictionary of Quotations and looked up "memory."
[ edited by snot monster from outer space on 2009-02-12 23:20 ]
snot monster from outer space | February 12, 23:18 CET
Septimus | February 12, 23:19 CET
snot monster from outer space | February 12, 23:21 CET
I do kind of like the "the memories have a life of their own" angle, though.
Yeah, that idea could be made to work. The show could make a case that consciousness is "just" what happens when memories "collide" if you like (I think that's not a million miles away from one contender for an actual theory of consciousness, among many).
Google says that's Nietzsche.
Well, it's not particularly pithy or insightful so i'm not surprised they didn't bother with the credit ;).
(in fairness, maybe it was more insightful in the 19th century)
Saje | February 12, 23:25 CET
During the late 90's a company called R-corp started a project called The Orpheus Initiative, investigating the use of Altered State of Consciousness (ASC), Electric Voice Phenomenon (EVP) and Instrumental Transcommunication (ITC). The official purpose was to give rich people the opportunity to talk to their dead relatives. During 2001 the project was stopped and by then over 20 Orpheus laboratories (called R Prime-labs) existed on different campuses all over the USA.
Despite the official close down of the Orpheus Initiative the satellites used as uplinks still kept streaming data and for a long time no one could surveil the information. But in the beginning of February 2009 the web page rprimelab.com appeared and one of the R Prime-labs, who had not been in use since 1999, used it to stream videos through. Something that has been gone for eight years is back again.
wiesengrund | February 12, 23:29 CET
Septimus | February 12, 23:32 CET
ETA: And more.
The video interview system will be online in approximately 12+ hrs…
ETA2: And even more.
[ edited by wiesengrund on 2009-02-12 23:56 ]
wiesengrund | February 12, 23:34 CET
"Who"? That's either some damn sloppy proof reading or maybe Septimus really is on to something.
snot monster from outer space | February 12, 23:59 CET
snot monster from outer space | February 13, 00:00 CET
R Prime is a distant relative of Optimus Prime. When Hazel explored the lab, she did not realise she was inside the belly of a Transformer who could disguise themselves as a laboratory. Sadly for Hazel when R Prime tranformed back into a robot, she got squished and that was the end of her.
Simon | February 13, 00:03 CET
The One True b!X | February 13, 01:32 CET
Septimus | February 13, 01:51 CET
If it's not Joss or one of the Mutant Enemy writers on this, then who would do it ? Someone in marketing ?
I know they usually aren't considered solid canon, if canon at all. But if they're well done and they fit into the universe comfortably, it's nice to have the option of considering them so in case the showrunner never weighs in on them (and they probably wouldn't, at least not this early on, as it would be counterproductive to promoting the show).
Don't often make time for these, but maybe this time...if it starts spoiling anything or hinting too heavily at what's going on within the show though (doubtful if it's over in three weeks), I'll have to drop it.
I wish I could enlarge the viewing window a bit. The quality is good enough. It wouldn't look great in full screen (I tried with the "zoom" to blow up certain pieces of the screen, like when she was eating the granola or protein bar, but it does look a bit too grainy like that), but it could definitely be bigger.
Kris | February 13, 04:23 CET
The One True b!X | February 13, 04:33 CET
Septimus | February 13, 04:33 CET