Who's Shawna Malcolm? Ya got me. For those too lame to click the link, revelations in this article include further talk of Gellar making a two episode appearance for sweeps, hints of power struggles among Marsters & Boreanaz "Remember it's CALLED Angel," and another possible explanation of why Carpenter got the short end of the stick. To keep Angel around for season five, Mutant Enemy had to lighten things up and get away from the darker plotline of the past two seasons. Oh. And they had to slice some
August 31 2003
(SPOILER)
Big Fang Theory
Shawna Malcolm on the set of AtS (TV Guide Aug. 30th, 2003)
Who's Shawna Malcolm? Ya got me. For those too lame to click the link, revelations in this article include further talk of Gellar making a two episode appearance for sweeps, hints of power struggles among Marsters & Boreanaz "Remember it's CALLED Angel," and another possible explanation of why Carpenter got the short end of the stick. To keep Angel around for season five, Mutant Enemy had to lighten things up and get away from the darker plotline of the past two seasons. Oh. And they had to slice someone thing from the budget.
Who's Shawna Malcolm? Ya got me. For those too lame to click the link, revelations in this article include further talk of Gellar making a two episode appearance for sweeps, hints of power struggles among Marsters & Boreanaz "Remember it's CALLED Angel," and another possible explanation of why Carpenter got the short end of the stick. To keep Angel around for season five, Mutant Enemy had to lighten things up and get away from the darker plotline of the past two seasons. Oh. And they had to slice some
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Unitas | August 31, 08:04 CET
wren | August 31, 10:22 CET
People who watch the show might want that. But I don't think the a lot of the *fans* are all that keen.
Buffy on AtS could be fun if Cordelia were there too.
Caroline | August 31, 10:52 CET
Simpleba | August 31, 13:08 CET
I'm not necessarily saying that's all they could afford. I mean money as in investment into the series that they feel will wisely bring a greater return. I mean let's face it, the Heart of a Champion campaign fizzled. There's not that much of a fan base for Connor. Cordelia has 'evolved' so far away from the core of what made her a lovable bitca to just an A-1 Beeyatch. We can't tell anymore if she turned evil cuz Jasmine was driving or if Cordy honestly spent time as a higher being and learned objectively or sociopathically that Angelus has a better grip on reality than Angel. Perhaps it's best just not rattling that beehive, y'know? Maybe we should leave well enough alone. I for one wouldn't find it very entertaining. I don't really WANT to know.
They could have either spent money on bringing back those two actors and continue the Angel's Son plot arc that has for the past two seasons dragged Angel down into the mud, or they could try going in a completely new direction, lighten things up a little, and bring in fresh new blood. Should they have handled things better with Carpenter? Probably, but there really is no nice way of telling someone who has been such an integral part of the whole 'Verse for seven years that they're being put out to pasture.
What's important is the story. The show must go on. If they can tell the story without Carpenter as Cordy, so much the better. Between you, me and the wall though? I'm thinking that if they wait long enough they can bring Cordy back but Carpenter doesn't have to play her. There's ways to make that happen. Of course the fan base may storm the castle if things go that way.
ZachsMind | August 31, 20:05 CET
Her exact words were ``I was not prepared,'' Carpenter said in a phone interview. ``I don't think you're ever prepared for that kind of situation. Seven years, that's a long time. I started that show. To not be finishing it is a pretty big deal for me."
Of course she's not jumping for joy about leaving. But that doesn't mean there's a controversy here. A savvy reader could read the various words of Carpenter and Whedon and whoever else is involved in a number of different ways. I'm pretty sure I've read everything that the next person has regarding Carpenter's departure, and I don't think anyone has to necessarily be 'not telling the truth.' The truth may be more complicated than we know, and they are only be divulging bits and pieces of it. I'm sure it's hard to judge what things are appropriate for the ears and minds of thousands of strangers and what things are best kept private. I prefer not to jump to any conclusions.
forcorreo | August 31, 20:52 CET
Simpleba | September 01, 02:39 CET