The Totally Rad Show vs. Dollhouse.
40 minutes and 54 seconds into the video podcast series, the hosts give their opinions on the first three episodes during their TV segment.
The consensus seems to be, "It's average, bordering on bad but it's Joss Whedon, so we'll keep watching."
If only they had waited until episode four, which does play on the green screen in the background behind them. :)
March 11 2009
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


I can't say I really disagree with them. I would have stopped watching too if not for the fact that it's Joss, and his shows do take a while to start up. I can't wait for episode 6 though.
As for TRS, I usually agree with Jeff for the video games and Dan for the movies and TV. Never really agree with Alex all that often though...
whoisfriend | March 11, 09:37 CET
BrownCoat_Tabz | March 11, 16:37 CET
kungfubear | March 11, 18:31 CET
*laughs* thanks for that! a much needed funny :D
Krusher | March 11, 18:41 CET
I also think their thoughts would have been tarred having watched episode 3 last, who's premise stank of network intervention. I reckon they would have said the same thing after episodes 1-3 of Buffy/Firefly (in fact, probably even more negative on the Buffy front). Something like: it's hokey; Cordellia's really annoying and shallow; Xander's fancying of Buffy will get old really quickly; Angel (cf. Bollard) seems surplus to requirements; Giles is just dull. And Buffy's hot but a bit whiney.
Essentially they're saying "I'm waiting for all the pieces to fall into place". Thinking about it, I think Whedon's work is very like solving a complicated puzzle. You have to put in a very hard slog in order to make very slow progress and then BOOM: everything starts to pay off, and you're sprinting to completion. My prediction for episode 6: Bollard's a vampire with a soul, or Echo accidentally gets married.
applie | March 11, 19:09 CET
SoddingNancyTribe | March 11, 19:14 CET
Sunfire | March 11, 19:49 CET
With DH, however, I find myself already "hooked" because I find the primes so darn interesting that I can feed off of that until the characters are better fleshed out.
As for his comments regarding Eliza's performance, I have to completely disagree. I think she is one of the strongest actresses on TV - and has been since season one of Angel; the scene where she is begging angel to kill her still gives me chills! From that point onward, I think Eliza has earned her salt as a "leading lady". Her performance as Echo in ep. 4 left me breathless and wanting more, and I see some very interesting dilemmas arising for both her character and for the audience later on.
To summarize: I don't see this show as teetering on the edge of its own potential, I think (for the most part) it has met it - I just think that the stuff people keep hoping to see more of would be inappropriate, be forced, and wouldn't have nearly the impact if it was placed in the early-on eps. So far, I love the show.
[ edited by crhobbs42 on 2009-03-11 21:38 ]
[ edited by crhobbs42 on 2009-03-11 21:38 ]
[ edited by crhobbs42 on 2009-03-11 21:39 ]
crhobbs42 | March 11, 21:37 CET
Ballard/Bollard; Angel/Angelus.
I rest my case.
applie | March 13, 00:17 CET