Ratings for last night's Dollhouse.
It scored a 1.5/5 in the demo and 4.13 million viewers tuned in to "Man on the Street" last night. Marc Berman says "To the fans of Dollhouse: dont rule this show out. There could be a possibility this will return next season."
Half-hour ratings:
9:00 p.m. V: 4.22 m, A18-49: 1.5/ 5
9:30 p.m.: v: 4.04 m, A18-49: 1.5/ 4
The ratings so far:
Episode 1 - 4.8 million, 2.0 in 18-49 demo.
Episode 2 - 4.3 million, 1.7 in 18-49 demo. 5% share.
Episode 3 - 4.2 million, 1.6 in 18-49 demo. 5% share.
Episode 4 - 3.5 million, 1.5 in 18-49 demo, 5% share.
Episode 5 - 4.3 million, 1.6 in 18-49 demo, 5% share.
Episode 6 - 4.1 million, 1.5 in 18-49 demo, 5% share.
Thanks to The Dark Shape and gossi.
March 21 2009
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


But what does this really mean? Anyone numerate and informed in the ways of networks in the building?
I've totally fallen for Dollhouse now. Must have it. Must have it continue. Must.
[ edited by phlebotinin on 2009-03-21 17:31 ]
phlebotinin | March 21, 17:30 CET
http://pifeedback.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/63310451/m/506103791
The Dark Shape | March 21, 17:32 CET
embers | March 21, 17:33 CET
They are absurdly different for Friday Night Lights, too. Why is it so difficult to get non-conflicting data?
Edited to add: Why replace the first post that made up the thread with Marc Berman's data? Is Marc Berman the gold standard? (Not a snarky question, just wondering about this shifting, roiling sea of conflicting numbers.)
[ edited by phlebotinin on 2009-03-21 17:41 ]
phlebotinin | March 21, 17:34 CET
adg1034 | March 21, 17:35 CET
JMaloney | March 21, 17:41 CET
edcsLover9 | March 21, 17:41 CET
Ameer | March 21, 17:42 CET
[ edited by helcat on 2009-03-21 17:44 ]
helcat | March 21, 17:43 CET
phlebotinin | March 21, 17:43 CET
Episode 2 - 4.3 million, 1.7 in 18-49 demo. 5% share.
Episode 3 - 4.2 million, 1.6 in 18-49 demo. 5% share.
Episode 4 - 3.5 million, 1.5 in 18-49 demo, 5% share.
Episode 5 - 4.3 million, 1.6 in 18-49 demo, 5% share.
Episode 6 - 4.1 million, 1.5 in 18-49 demo, 5% share.
gossi | March 21, 17:44 CET
Simon | March 21, 17:44 CET
phlebotinin, the first link I posted was a link to the fast national ratings.
The link I posted now that The Dark Shape pointed out is a link to the final numbers.
J.I.G. | March 21, 17:45 CET
redders | March 21, 17:45 CET
redeem147 | March 21, 17:47 CET
Ameer | March 21, 17:47 CET
I timeshifted Dollhouse to the west coast feed.
redeem147 | March 21, 17:52 CET
gossi | March 21, 17:52 CET
helcat | March 21, 17:53 CET
So, from gossi's helpful list, Dollhouse is still getting pretty much the same 5% share. And it has built up again from its low of 3.5 million viewers (which I'm personally convinced was a reaction to "Stage Fright").
I wonder if these numbers will be good enough for the network to give it a second season. I personally have nothing to say about these numbers because I wouldn't know what I'm talking about. I can be neither (informatively) glad or sad, although it is nice that the show isn't steadily plummeting. That's good, isn't it? Too bad, though, that it hasn't come close to recapturing its opening night numbers (which weren't fantastic themselves).
I am intrigued that Marc Berman now writes that Dollhouse still has a shot. It would seem from the comments section on his page that only recently he was emphasizing Dollhouse's "losing performance."
phlebotinin | March 21, 17:54 CET
gossi | March 21, 17:56 CET
JMaloney | March 21, 17:57 CET
helcat | March 21, 17:58 CET
gossi | March 21, 17:59 CET
J.I.G. | March 21, 18:05 CET
phlebotinin | March 21, 18:05 CET
wilder | March 21, 18:13 CET
helcat | March 21, 18:13 CET
Can't wait to see what the DVR numbers are, and I wish they'd release FoD/Hulu/iTunes numbers as well.
C. A. Bridges | March 21, 18:22 CET
C.A. Bridges, for additional hilarity it's worth noting March Madness increased it's 18-49 demo compared to the usual competition (FLASHPOINT).
The numbers for DOLLHOUSE, whilst not amazing, do look pretty solid for a friday night show. I think from here on out it's all about momentum for the series (creatively).
gossi | March 21, 18:31 CET
I could see a reasonable case being made that, given the consistent weekly audience and the good supplementary numbers that a renewal (perhaps only for 13 episodes) and a summer of promotion (just continue streaming the episodes for free, a DVD release, allow fans to continue pitching the show to their friends) could possibly grow that audience. That's essentially what happened with The Office, if I recall.
Now, I'm not saying Dollhouse could grow to the same extent and it's not likely, in a single season, to double that 1.5 into a 3.0 and become a hit. But, I'd say the possibility of Dollhouse growing that 1.5 number into the mid 2.0 range (especially since it premiered to a 2.0 just through advertising, a second season premiere would have those first 13 episodes to entice an audience with) on Fridays is much higher than any pilot they pick up (or struggling property they move) of premiering to something better.
Given that some costs (like the set) are already sunk (in comparison to buying a new property to premiere on Friday night, I mean), the general dearth of good TV that's even remotely science fictiony, the fact that Whedon is a known quantity and some critical goodwill towards the network would result from throwing him a bone, you'd have to think that figures in as well.
I think, especially if it sees any bump from Prison Break or trends back towards that 2.0 number, it stands a pretty good shot. Or, I can see Joss and the other folks involved making a decent case.
Dirk | March 21, 18:51 CET
TamaraC | March 21, 18:52 CET
Prison Break has been a consistently popular show with an 18-34 male audience, it's the reason it has stayed on the air for four years despite never being a mega hit. You'd figure some of them would tune in to watch the show end. Shows tend to get a bounce towards the end of their run, people come back to see how it ends, especially on decently series finales. Shit, Dawn Ostroff renewed 7th Heaven a few years because of the series finale bounce it got (and, stupidly, cancelled Everwood as a result). If some of the Prison Break viewes stick around to sample Dollhouse, that'd be incredibly helpful.
Dirk | March 21, 19:03 CET
helcat | March 21, 19:10 CET
I fell in love with DH in a scary new way last night. I mean, that episode was just... Wow...
crhobbs42 | March 21, 19:15 CET
gossi | March 21, 19:46 CET
9:00 p.m. V: 4.22 m, A18-49: 1.5/ 5
9:30 p.m.: v: 4.04 m, A18-49: 1.5/ 4
It's the first episode so far which has turned people off mid episode.
gossi | March 21, 19:57 CET
Edit: I'm going to edit those numbers in in the original post if you don't mind.
[ edited by J.I.G. on 2009-03-21 20:01 ]
J.I.G. | March 21, 20:00 CET
Ameer | March 21, 20:03 CET
If anybody wants to stack it against the NCAA thing:
9:00 p.m. 9.15 million (#1), A18-49: 3.2/10 (#1)
9:30 p.m. 8.29 million (#1), A18-49: 2.9/ 9 (#1)
So both Dollhouse and NCAA lost viewers at 9.30pm. Maybe it was Battlestar?
gossi | March 21, 20:07 CET
doubtful guest | March 21, 20:12 CET
gossi | March 21, 20:17 CET
I would be interested in the late night block of games, which had two games go to overtime. I wonder if the numbers for the 10 pm Eastern dropped significantly. And those games would be going against Dollhouse on the West Coast.
Particularly in sports, if a game is competitive the ratings generally increase as the game draws to a conclusion. If it is not, they drop.
[ edited by crazygolfa on 2009-03-21 20:24 ]
crazygolfa | March 21, 20:18 CET
gossi, have you seen any indication that Fox has plans to advertise the show? I have yet to see a single ad for it and it comes back in less than a month. It'll be interesting to see if it gets even the bare bones ad support that TSCC got on its return.
TamaraC | March 21, 20:27 CET
10:00 p.m. 8.55 million (#1), A18-49: 3.0/ 9 (#1)
10:30 p.m. 7.98 million (#1), A18-49: 2.9/ 9 (#1)
helcat | March 21, 20:30 CET
Since PRISON BREAK will be on air during May sweeps with DOLLHOUSE, you would think FOX would advertise it. They have a responsibility to their advertisers to try to prop Friday nights up during that period.
gossi | March 21, 20:32 CET
TamaraC | March 21, 20:39 CET
[ edited by gossi on 2009-03-21 20:46 ]
gossi | March 21, 20:46 CET
I'm not sure who schedules the games. The NCAA or CBS or both. Makes me think there were Dollhouse fans amongst the scheduling people. ;)
crazygolfa | March 21, 20:47 CET
TamaraC | March 21, 20:52 CET
Really? I thought Prison Break (outside of some dips due to the World Series and one of the episodes airing at Christmas time, when people aren't watching TV) was still pulling down a 2.2-2.6 in 18-49. It seems like it has a loyal, core audience, is all I'm saying. If it matches it's season low (which appears to be 5,000,000 total viewers and a 1.9 in 18-49) leading into Dollhouse that'd be pretty decent. Especially if any number of those folks would be willing to stick around. At the very least, it would mean that Dollhouse wouldn't have to grow out of its lead-in.
[ edited by Dirk on 2009-03-21 21:02 ]
Dirk | March 21, 20:58 CET
Of course TSCC viewers dropped (but DVR viewers have increased by around 50%) by moving to the Friday slot. Now Prison Break who got less DVR viewers and has been on hiatus/canceled much longer is going to move into the same Friday slot that doomed TSCC and do better? Really? It is has been off the air longer and is known by almost everyone to be a canceled and dead show.
There is no way PB will pull 5M viewers or a 1.8 in the demo on a Friday night at 8. It will be a miracle for it to get 4M viewers and a 1.5.
I don't get your optimism about PB. And in no way would it help Dollhouse in the minds of TPTB for Dollhouse to not improve on PB's leadin. If Dollhouse doesn't improve on Prison Break, it will be canceled for sure. I just don't happen to think that will be much of a problem.
[ edited by TamaraC on 2009-03-21 21:13 ]
TamaraC | March 21, 21:12 CET
gossi | March 21, 21:16 CET
Which is weird because I thought the industry buzz was that he was safe because Rice needs someone to show him how the television side of things works.
The One True b!X | March 21, 21:19 CET
Or what b!x said 3 seconds earlier than me. :)
[ edited by TamaraC on 2009-03-21 21:21 ]
TamaraC | March 21, 21:21 CET
The One True b!X | March 21, 21:23 CET
I've no idea if there's any truth in it. The fact Fox have two big execs go in recent weeks suggest they are shaking things up.
gossi | March 21, 21:23 CET
Admittedly, I wasn't paying much attention to either show because they're both, you know, bad. But, I think the situations are different. Prison Break's concept never lent itself to a long run, I tend to think most of the decline is due to viewers getting tired of the concept and the general TV viewing post-strike. The folks that were tuning in in the fall and some of the older viewers may tune in for the final batch of episodes. It's a burn off, but to a four-year, loyal Prison Break viewer, the distinction probably doesn't matter (this is a special breed of person). Terminator has pretty much been declining since its series premiere, which indicates (to me) that people sampled it and thought it sucked. It never had the same kind of consistent audience of Prison Break.
I think there's a chance that Prison Break does better on Friday than Terminator. I look back at Friday Night Lights and it managed to carry most of its audience to Friday night. Different fanbases, different circumstances, it's unknowable, but I've got some hope that Prison Break could do some good for Dollhouse. Even if it's just by exposing some hardcore Prison Break fans to Dollhouse.
[ edited by Dirk on 2009-03-21 21:38 ]
Dirk | March 21, 21:35 CET
I do believe I saw this coming. *looks around with a wise and caring expression*
Succatash | March 21, 21:44 CET
IMMORTAL | March 21, 21:44 CET
Dirk, I don't think Prison Break fans and Dollhouse fans are at all similar. One show requires absolutely no thought and the other is the opposite. Not at all the same fans.
TamaraC | March 21, 21:51 CET
The One True b!X | March 21, 21:53 CET
Dollhouse is hardly a Russian novel, Tamara. Shit, Joss wouldn't want it to be. David Simon could tell him what happens when your show gets a reputation as being 'hard' or 'impenetrable'. I have to admire anyone who has stuck it out with Prison Break, silly and incoherent though it may be. A good writer can make something intellectual, complex and awesome, but also inherently accessible and delightful (provided people pay attention). Joss is one of those guys. I think anyone who would give a chance, Prison Break fan or otherwise, could get a lot out of Dollhouse. Or, maybe if they just watched the pilot, skipped episodes 2-5, and continued on from 'Man On The Street'.
Dirk | March 21, 22:06 CET
Gosh, I swear that I read someone saying this to you a little while back... if only I could remember who it was ;).
zeitgeist | March 21, 22:10 CET
LiLi | March 21, 22:11 CET
ETA: and I think Prison Break deserves more respect than it is getting. Having watched the first season on DVD, the second "live", and kinda losing interest mid-third season, I can say that, while it didn't ultimately hold my interest, there were wonderful "macgyver"-esque machinations to the plotting and at least some ongoing emotional resonance to some of the relationships, such as the FBI agent-turned-co-conspirator or the loyalty and committment of a character like Sucre. I'd take its first two seasons over most of the procedurals out there.
[ edited by doubtful guest on 2009-03-21 22:18 ]
doubtful guest | March 21, 22:12 CET
Reilly's job seems to be rock solid.
Thanks, zeitgeist. I'll never get this html stuff. Don't know how many times I have read the how to instructions and I still don't get it.
[ edited by zeitgeist on 2009-03-21 22:15 ]
[ edited by TamaraC on 2009-03-21 22:20 ]
TamaraC | March 21, 22:13 CET
The One True b!X | March 21, 22:14 CET
zeitgeist | March 21, 22:15 CET
I'm getting stupidly optimistic about the show's chances again. I am really just bouncing between the depths of despair and the heights of optimism.
Jobo | March 21, 22:18 CET
I just don't think there are enough PB fans who will go out of their way on a Friday night to make PB get better ratings than TSCC (which is almost guaranteed cancellation).
My admitted bias is that I find the show more boring than watching paint dry, but I feel the same way about CSI which gets a crazy amount of viewers every week. My conversation with Dirk has very little to do with quality and everything to do with facts and numbers. Pretty much the same way that networks make decisions about shows. US Broadcast television is not a meritocracy.
TamaraC | March 21, 22:18 CET
Surely Fox and the Dollhouse producers had to know that they were up against the 2-hour final episode of Battlestar Galactica?
Me? I taped Dollhouse.
Hello, Fox? I TAPED it. Because I TIME SHIFT. Look it up.
I hope they don't Firefly Dollhouse.
AmazonGirl | March 21, 22:23 CET
Such is my minor complaint. I wonder how truly safe a network exec's job can be. It seems a pretty unstable world. Kevin Reilly helped give further life to The Office and FNL, didn't he? Then I hope he gets treated well by new management.
phlebotinin | March 21, 22:46 CET
Nebula1400 | March 21, 23:06 CET
Little Green Kid | March 21, 23:34 CET
chrisd | March 22, 00:23 CET
Mort | March 22, 00:42 CET
gossi | March 22, 01:46 CET
zeitgeist | March 22, 01:53 CET
gossi | March 22, 01:58 CET
zeitgeist | March 22, 02:13 CET
That's right-- Tahmoh's sexy scenes are on FOX now! Also something about Whedon and dolls, I dunno.
Sunfire | March 22, 02:22 CET
[ edited by ShanshuBugaboo on 2009-03-22 02:27 ]
ShanshuBugaboo | March 22, 02:26 CET
gossi | March 22, 02:26 CET
ShanshuBugaboo | March 22, 02:29 CET
Hunted | March 22, 02:32 CET
zeitgeist | March 22, 02:51 CET
That's gotta be the coolest quote to come out of Whedonesque :)
If Dollhouse gets cancelled, we'll be like "No way, FOX fireflied again, they're fireflying all over the place".
danielgm | March 22, 02:52 CET
Firefly that is, not Dollhouse.
[ edited by The One True b!X on 2009-03-22 03:01 ]
The One True b!X | March 22, 03:00 CET
Madhatter | March 22, 03:01 CET
danielgm | March 22, 03:07 CET
This episode is indeed a noticable improvement over the first five. The level of writing and plot stepped up a level or two.
The whole conversation with the F.B.I. agent and the guy who hired Echo, was good stuff.
Topher still sucks and I'd like to see him get killed off. And the scoring for the show still sucks as well (I'm going to keep asking for a composer change until it happens).
The preview for this episode last week sure did make it seem more epic in scope than it was and like there would be a hell of a lot more happening in this episode, but it was just clever editing, that's all. Still, I found myself more engrossed in this episode and actually -- for the first time -- enjoying watching it.
Maybe Joss thought that twist ending there would be a surprise, but considering his M.O., did anyone actually think that that Handler was just going to "get away with it"? Come on.
And a touching kind of sad ending with a song that made it work well.
Preview for next week looks like enough to keep me going. Hell, if the episodes keep being this much better and improve, I'll probably stick around for the remainder of the S1 run. And I think re-filiming and re-writing of the first five episodes would help the series TREMENDOUSLY. That and whipping the execs at FOX who fudged with it until they bleed. If only we could tear their skins off like a certain dark witch did in BTVS...
tharpdevenport | March 22, 04:17 CET
Oh my gosh, did I just defend Fox?!
SNT, think I need my head examined, must be a flaw in there some place....
Madhatter | March 22, 05:36 CET
John Darc | March 22, 06:13 CET
Ivalaine | March 22, 06:58 CET
The One True b!X | March 22, 07:26 CET
[ edited by mangydog on 2009-03-22 17:03 ]
mangydog | March 22, 08:19 CET
TamaraC | March 22, 08:36 CET
Just for the record, I think murdering FOX executives is probably a vibe we don't want to go for. Especially since many of the problems people are complaining about online are kinda Joss's fault.
gossi | March 22, 14:11 CET
SteveP | March 22, 14:56 CET
I missed this earlier. Please don't make comments like that here ever again. It's highly unpleasant.
Simon | March 22, 15:09 CET
phlebotinin | March 22, 16:03 CET
gossi, why do you say the problems were Joss's fault? He rewrote the pilot, and adopted the format of the first five episodes to please Fox right? Or are you referring to some other problems?
Squishy | March 22, 17:14 CET
CarpeNoctem | March 22, 18:14 CET
You can't expect FOX to give it 7 seasons when bars and tone would draw better ratings.
jfhlbuffy | March 22, 18:22 CET
gossi | March 22, 22:26 CET
Jillybug | March 22, 23:22 CET
Racoon Boy | March 22, 23:56 CET
JMaloney | March 23, 00:47 CET
redeem147 | March 23, 02:14 CET
cheryl | March 23, 02:36 CET
But I was a fan of the first five episodes (and the sixth), so I can't speak much further on the subject.
Jobo | March 23, 04:54 CET
Even Stargate's getting all dark and survivory, but if they try that reset button at the end of every episode, I think they'll become a laughing stock.
Joss caved to network pressures because that's his bloody job. He didn't come up with a show and then pitch it to Fox, Eliza asked him to come up with a show to fill her contract with Fox, they bought the idea, and then got noiry art when they wanted a new Prison Break. So he retooled, and now we have noiry Prison Break, with a bunch of Philip K. Dick peppered in.
PuppetDoug | March 23, 09:56 CET
Squishy | March 23, 14:03 CET
catherine | March 23, 15:07 CET
wiesengrund | March 23, 15:11 CET
Sunfire | March 23, 15:50 CET
Saje | March 23, 16:07 CET
The ratings for BSG "took off" at 2.1 million total viewers. Dollhouse is floundering in third place with 4.13 million viewers. Yes, one is on cable and the other is not, but this show nobody gets (except I think I do get it) has twice the number of viewers as the cult hit.
I liked MotS far better than the BSG finale. After watching the latter for the last six years, the finale in all its Return of the Kingness took the easy way out of explaining everything.
Nebula1400 | March 23, 16:10 CET
Ep 6 was better than eps 1-4 and about as good or slightly better than 5. The best parts were the performances of Mellie and guest star Ratatouille-guy's turn as the Internet mogul. The story itself was more intense and there was greater craft and care in staging the spectacle aspects (e.g., the kitchen fight in the Chinese restaurant, the attempted murder of Mellie). All examples of good but still pretty standard genre TV.
*As to what I mean by "wit," I'm not talking about quippy, clever dialog, although certainly that's one example. In that area I think DH has been pretty solid. Fewer one-liners, perhaps, but so what? The amount of wit at the level of dialog has been appropriate to the kind of story Joss is trying to tell (actually, as much as I enjoyed Mellie's lines in ep 6, they seemed jarringly charming and clever -- only because they were nowhere in evidence in previous episodes).
The wit I have in mind is found in the use of themes and metaphors (high school as a literal hell, for example, in Buffy) and the delightful metatextual "commentary" or tour-de-force twists of the storyteller. These latter examples of wit are the thrilling little deviations from the storytelling norm that suggest to me that the storyteller (Joss) knows his material and is having some fun coloring outside the lines. The title of Buffy the Vampire Slayer is as pure an example of this that I know. The show itself is filled with examples of this kind of witty zigzag from the usual expectations: Angel's reversion into a soulless predator, the death of Jenny Calendar, the wonderful gimmick of playing out almost an entire episode without speech (also a great example of witty treatment of themes and metaphor).
To date, there has been nothing like this on Dollhouse.
1starbuckstown | March 23, 16:57 CET
[ edited by jfhlbuffy on 2009-03-23 17:32 ]
jfhlbuffy | March 23, 17:31 CET
1) FOX changed the episode order. Wrong. Actually: Joss did. He says so in the Maxim interview, explicitly, that he suggested doing it.
2) FOX made joss do "6 pilots". Wrong. That was always Joss's plan. You can find it in the very first interviews for Dollhouse back November 2007, where he talks about that idea. You can also find Joss talking about how he did it for Angel and Firefly, on the DVD commentaries for those shows.
3) FOX made the new first episode bad. Kinda wrong. Whilst I definitely think FOX's notes led the wrong direction, Joss Whedon wrote and directed "Ghost". He wrote every line. Every scene. He was on set every day directing everything.
FOX absolutely shares part of the blame for the thing initially not gelling. But they're not this evil faceless corp trying to mess up their shows. They asked for it to be funnier, more action packed. They said "The Target" was a brilliant script. They said make the show more like that. They pitched many of the things in "Man On The Street" - Joss talks about this in interviews. So, ya know. Maybe, just maybe, FOX had a point in some of the things they were saying.
gossi | March 23, 18:23 CET
Sunfire | March 23, 18:46 CET
TamaraC | March 23, 18:54 CET
Sunfire | March 23, 19:07 CET
Somebody did point out to me the other day in the pub that sometimes it's better to leave people to believe in myth. Which, you know, fair enough.
gossi | March 23, 19:21 CET
Simon | March 23, 19:25 CET
gossi | March 23, 19:29 CET
In which case I guess it either becomes the show FOX tried to hard to kill but couldn't (for those who like it) or the show FOX slowly smothered with mediocrity and kept because it sufficiently sucked to meet their crappy standards (for those who don't like it).
Sunfire | March 23, 19:34 CET
It's like bizarro-Jaynestown. Please just let us have our imaginary villain.
[ edited by Jobo on 2009-03-23 19:37 ]
Jobo | March 23, 19:37 CET
I know it's left me exhausted, and I won't be trying it again. Also, Joss Rulz! Down with FOX!
Fan history is written by those who write the Whedonesque headlines
Hee hee.
ETA I do actually think Joss Rulz ;)
[ edited by catherine on 2009-03-23 19:42 ]
catherine | March 23, 19:42 CET
I think "Ghost" suffered from being rushed, and from Joss not finding the tone of the new direction yet. But to me, "The Target," "Grey Hour," and "True Believer" are all stronger than the original pilot (at least based on the script).
"Man On The Street" does seem closest in tone to "Echo" (the pilot, not the character), but it's a more concise, intense, funny, and action-packed version of it. And it seems like it was the Fox notes that got it there, as Joss himself has said.
bonzob | March 23, 20:24 CET
redeem147 | March 23, 20:57 CET
Sunfire | March 23, 21:00 CET
SteppeMerc | March 23, 21:19 CET
alexreager | March 23, 21:22 CET
SteppeMerc | March 23, 21:47 CET
Sunfire | March 23, 21:52 CET
I guarantee it will make the evening news...which could translate to viewers. However the mention might not be in the entertainment segment. (In other words, they may think you're a whacko.)
[ edited by alexreager on 2009-03-23 22:00 ]
alexreager | March 23, 21:55 CET
JOSS ENTERS OFFICE.
He is dressed in ALL WHITE. He glows slightly. Like Peter Petrilli from Heroes, except with less emo hair. Or just hair.
FOX EXEC KEVIN REILLY ENTERS OFFICE.
He is dressed in ALL BLACK. He has a BLACK HELMET ON. Scary music plays. For the purpose of this memo we will call him Evil Bastard Exec.
JOSS
So, I hear you didn't like the Dollhouse pilot?
EVIL BASTARD EXEC
Yes, we do NOT. It was TOO GOOD. We want you to make it crap so we can CANCEL IT just to piss off YOUR FANS. It's not like we're a business and my job depends on us making successful shows so we can afford to pay my wage. Now die!
JOSS
Wait! Are you saying I should add some action, make it easier to understand since the audience might not be invested, make it look less like framed like a cable show and make it funnier and more involving before doing wacky Joss episodes?
EVIL BASTARD EXEC
Yes! No! I don't know. Joss, I have a secret... I AM
(Evil Bastard Exec took off his helmet)
EVIL BASTARD EXEC
Fury! David Fury. And I'm - yes - furious. And oddly hungry.
JOSS
Let's get lunch! Then we can discuss my next project whilst you cancel this one.
Then Joss and Kevin held hands in a romanic and entirely odd moment of joy.
That's how these things work, you heard it here first.
gossi | March 23, 22:04 CET
You have this particular dream a lot, don't you?
The One True b!X | March 23, 22:07 CET
redeem147 | March 23, 22:10 CET
Sunfire | March 23, 22:11 CET
catherine | March 23, 22:16 CET
wiesengrund | March 23, 23:05 CET
1) FOX changed the episode order. Wrong. Actually: Joss did. He says so in the Maxim interview, explicitly, that he suggested doing it.
2) FOX made joss do "6 pilots". Wrong. That was always Joss's plan. You can find it in the very first interviews for Dollhouse back November 2007, where he talks about that idea. You can also find Joss talking about how he did it for Angel and Firefly, on the DVD commentaries for those shows.
3) FOX made the new first episode bad. Kinda wrong. Whilst I definitely think FOX's notes led the wrong direction, Joss Whedon wrote and directed "Ghost". He wrote every line. Every scene. He was on set every day directing everything.
FOX absolutely shares part of the blame for the thing initially not gelling. But they're not this evil faceless corp trying to mess up their shows. They asked for it to be funnier, more action packed. They said "The Target" was a brilliant script. They said make the show more like that. They pitched many of the things in "Man On The Street" - Joss talks about this in interviews. So, ya know. Maybe, just maybe, FOX had a point in some of the things they were saying.
I would like to have that somewhere more visible. Maybe a dollverse-post? Maybe stop the snowball before it gets out of hand?
wiesengrund | March 23, 23:07 CET
doubtful guest | March 23, 23:09 CET
Little Green Kid | March 23, 23:52 CET
(1) Ghost. Yes, Joss himself rewrote and reshot the pilot episode in its entirety and so is in some sense ultimately responsible for its quality. But he did so as a result Fox's notes. Without Fox's involvement, the original pilot would likely have remained the actual pilot. The only question then, is whether the actual pilot (Ghost) was better or worse than the original Pilot (Echo). From what I've seen, the general critical consensus is that Echo was the better show (though some on here evidently disagree). The conclusion: Fox's involvement resulted in a lower quality pilot episode.
(2) The quality of the early episodes: Whatever Joss may have said about starting off with "pilot" episodes, he has clearly stated that it was Fox's "mandate" to "go ahead and just really make the first several episodes pure standalone engagement." This emphasis on standalone engagements to the exclusion of the "mythology that would play out over time" is precisely what most people have been complaining about in these first few episodes. Again, yes, Joss is the creator, he's ultimately responsible, the buck stops here, etc., etc., but the bottom line is still the same: But for Fox's "mandate", we would have had (I believe) a significantly stronger set of early episodes.
(3) As to the sequence of the early episodes, I think this is largely unimportant to quality, since eps 1-5 are all fairly comparable in quality, and since their "standalone" emphasis makes sequence essentially irrelevant.
Lest this post garner a deluge of outrage on behalf of Fox's tragically misunderstood executives, a few caveats: I'm not saying I think Fox Execs never add value, or that Joss never goofs up when left entirely to his own devices. What I am saying is that any issues in the first 5 eps are MORE attributable to Fox than to Joss -- at least in the sense that those eps would likely be stronger overall if Fox had never gotten involved.
Squishy | March 24, 03:27 CET
Hee.
I think in a case like this, it's "simpler" to attribute a creation to the creator, because we just don't know if the show would be stronger or weaker or dumber or stranger or what, without network notes, except that there are no shows made without network input as far as I know. I'm not sure I see the point of trying to dissect what is Joss's "fault" and what is the network's "fault." I agree that this last ep was the strongest, but we'll see where it goes from here. I liked eps 1, 2, 4, and 5 a lot too.
catherine | March 24, 04:49 CET
ETA: This site has quarter hour breakdowns and 25-54 demos for almost all Dollhouse episodes.
[ edited by wiesengrund on 2009-03-24 11:17 ]
wiesengrund | March 24, 10:46 CET