September 04 2003
IT'S OFFICIAL!
Firefly: The Motion Picture, Joss Whedon's feature directorial debut!
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
This site will work and look better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

keever | September 04, 11:56 CET
Tristan | September 04, 12:10 CET
chrisbolt | September 04, 12:22 CET
bobothebrave | September 04, 13:20 CET
Numfar PTB | September 04, 16:18 CET
Caroline | September 04, 16:33 CET
gingeriffic | September 04, 17:04 CET
I hope they can get the entire original crew back.
And that Fox learns something from the horrible mistake they made by canceling the series so soon, damn it.
fmonk | September 04, 17:10 CET
nick | September 04, 17:10 CET
Does anyone know if when the Hollywood Reporter is talking about Q1 '04 they mean that literally (Jan. - Mar. '04) or in the financial world sense (Oct. - Dec. '03)?
Petrov | September 04, 17:22 CET
Does anyone know if when the Hollywood Reporter is talking about Q1 '04 they mean that literally (Jan. - Mar. '04) or in the financial world sense (Oct. - Dec. '03)?
Petrov | September 04, 17:23 CET
Does anyone know if when the Hollywood Reporter is talking about Q1 '04 they mean that literally (Jan. - Mar. '04) or in the financial world sense (Oct. - Dec. '03)?
Petrov | September 04, 17:23 CET
Yay!
wren | September 04, 17:37 CET
(and, I might add, shiny!)
melsta | September 04, 17:42 CET
melsta | September 04, 17:47 CET
"That's not much."
"It's enough."
ZachsMind | September 04, 17:56 CET
ringworm | September 04, 18:21 CET
This is some hella good news.
Joss' bitch | September 04, 18:44 CET
Coll | September 04, 19:19 CET
;-)
melsta | September 04, 19:24 CET
AlterLeo | September 04, 19:38 CET
Oh, and wren, you're totally right about pre-production hell, but I don't think that'll be as much of an issue here. The casting is essentially done (assuming everybody agrees to come back), the bulk of the design work is done, and Joss probably started crafting the film in his mind the first time a FOX suit began monkeying with the show. Given all that, I think 1Q '04 is totally doable.
T. Earl Grey | September 04, 19:42 CET
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=filmNews&storyID=3384262
They just reprinted Hollywood Reporter's story, but it's already something.
[ edited by Numfar PTB on 2003-09-04 17:49 ]
Numfar PTB | September 04, 19:49 CET
Shiny indeed...
Fittztopher | September 04, 19:55 CET
nychick | September 04, 20:07 CET
zencat | September 04, 20:19 CET
Now if someone would just get around to making the return of Farscape happen all my just indeed be right with the world again :)
Petrov | September 04, 20:42 CET
gothamjoe | September 04, 20:57 CET
vpecoraro | September 04, 21:35 CET
The only concern I do have is that the movie does not
take Joss' attention away from Angel and future BtVs,
which are more important to me than Firefly.
Linda | September 04, 22:25 CET
Petrov | September 04, 23:20 CET
rsfayez | September 04, 23:44 CET
1. Firefly the film - Get it done and out of the way in time for Angel Six. First quarter of 2004 should give him about six months. More than enough time for everything but post production effects.
2. Angel tv series - The way things are now, only Whedon would direct less. Very hands on, and Whedon will lose more hair and gain more wrinkles. Very tight reins of the creative team, and probably a lot of coffee and stress-related doctor bills.
3. Ripper the whatever it becomes would see him in an Executive Producer role, where he hired people to do the real work and make his vision a reality, but he would oversee it supervisory and keep the reins alternately loose and tight.
4. A tv series featuring one or two of the Scoobies plus Fresh Meat. Would not be a hands-on project. Whedon would be Executive Consultant, and give it to people he trusts and trust them not to tick him off. Loose reins. I say give Jane Espenson a season where she gets Joss Whedon's Earth on the eastern seaboard. What would New York City be like with demons and slayers in it? Probably not all that different from ours, come to think of it. Near future thing. Before Fray but after Angel. One of the regulars would be a Slayer, but that'd just be one plot arc.
5. Xander and Willow no longer talk because she did the mojo on his eye socket without his permission. The magic eye works perfectly. No one can tell it's magic. Not even low level magic users. Xander got mad at her on principle and said some bad things in anger. He claims to never want to see her again. He storms off. He moves away and goes back into construction. Five years go by. Absolutely no issues with the magic eye. The world thinks it's normal. He thinks maybe he should track Willow down. Time has passed and it heals all wounds. She was his friend. He puts it off. One day he's working in a high rise and at a very inopportune moment, his magic eye starts working TOO well...
Oh, that last one's just a pipedream idea I have for fan fiction. Whedon would probably not touch that one at all. =)
...Penthouse? I don't get the joke. But then I NEVER _read_ Penthouse. *smirk*
[ edited by ZachsMind on 2003-09-04 22:03 ]
ZachsMind | September 04, 23:56 CET
Re: Xander & Willow (Zach), I felt like I was reading Penthouse Forum (yeah, I read Penthouse for the *articles*). Thanks! :)
Oddjob | September 05, 00:00 CET
steelbluerat | September 05, 00:05 CET
Apropos, I always know when Zachsmind is commenting because I have to pagedown five times before I see his nick. Not that that's a bad thing.
Once again, foamy!
stavrogin | September 05, 00:55 CET
Oddjob | September 05, 00:56 CET
ascii_102_117 | September 05, 01:33 CET
[ edited by babykarret on 2003-09-05 03:54 ]
babykarret | September 05, 05:54 CET
waynesworld | September 05, 08:29 CET
**jumping for joy**
Not only to we get some closure (and more exposure..ooh, that rhymed) to Firefly, but Joss is making the first movie that's really his. (I believe someone made a similar comment it was...**checking to see who said it**...rsfayez.)
I'm excited. Our Joss is making a movie!
forcorreo | September 05, 11:43 CET
melsta | September 05, 13:47 CET
Simon | September 05, 15:46 CET
Tristan | September 05, 18:06 CET
Simply awesome, and I join the others who are doing the 'sticking it in the face of those boobs at FOX dance'.
Great site btw - keep up the top work!
elroy | September 05, 19:15 CET
Would you hate me forever if I said I honestly could care less? Good. Hate me forever.
The BuffyWorld is his child too. A creative artist's work is similar to having a child. Worse actually, because the more successful, the "bigger" the metaphorical baby becomes, the more people are needed to help cradle it. And I bet Buffy's World has gotten bigger than Clifford The Big Red Dog in that regard, and it's only about eleven or twelve years old (counting the original film).
I'd say conference the nanny in once a day and ask her to put the kid up to the phone. But that's just me.
Whedon could opt to just do the Firefly movie this early spring, Angel next fall, and give creative control of other BuffyWorld projects to others, retain a bit of a hands-on creative input capacity for these other projects, and devote more time to his son.
However, I thought Whedon said volumes with the whole Connor & Angel thing. Doesn't matter how much devotion and attention one divides towards offspring from other concerns: life will find a way to screw you both up. It never fails.
There. Now, how many pagedowns wuzzat? *smirk*
ZachsMind | September 05, 22:47 CET
As for my beliefs... it's like this exchange in Matrix Reloaded:
Lock: G**d***it Morpheus, not everyone believes what you believe.
Morpheus: My beliefs do not require them to.
waynesworld | September 06, 08:56 CET
t r a c y | September 08, 09:31 CET