"Fe fi fo... ...Fucking fum."
April 01
2009
(SPOILER)
For the discussion of Buffy #24.
Titled 'Safe', this issue is written by Jim Krueger (
Earth X, Justice) and is set around a special partnership.
Simon
| BtVS
| 15:43 CET
|
79 comments total
| tags: buffy season 8, jim krueger, dark horse, cliff richards, jo chen
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
The Guardian applauds Dollhouse's ...
|
Dollhouse gets UK airdate.
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
Jillybug | April 01, 16:22 CET
Pointy | April 01, 17:41 CET
wenxina | April 01, 17:55 CET
ETA: He has a web site.
[ edited by Pointy on 2009-04-01 18:22 ]
Pointy | April 01, 18:18 CET
Even though my comic shop sometimes doesn't get their shipment until late in the day Wednesday (if not Thursday) and comic shop guy hasn't sorted through it and doesn't always like to go through the box to hand out the recent stuff the night of shipment, I'm gonna call ahead and see if I can get it tonight anyway. Wouldn't mind participating in a Season 8 discussion the day of, for once.
Kris | April 01, 18:20 CET
wonderflonium | April 01, 18:21 CET
Pointy | April 01, 18:28 CET
1starbuckstown | April 01, 18:41 CET
This issue makes me want a Faith/Giles miniseries at some point even more now.
[ edited by Buffyfantic on 2009-04-01 20:31 ]
Buffyfantic | April 01, 20:24 CET
When we find Giles and Faith (who, as an aside, thankfully exude all the romantic tension of Detectives Munch and Finn on "Law & Order: SVU"), they are doing exactly the job we thought -- patrolling the night to help Slayers get a handle on what they're doing. Somewhat surprisingly, though, the first measure we see them apply to whether or not a Slayer is troubled is the fact that she ran out on her squad. That's a perfectly legitimate measure of someone being unhappy, but it's not a promising start for people who were hoping this subplot would somehow be a total condemnation of Buffy and her choices and her leadership. Giles and Faith (rightfully) understand that the "choice to be chosen" as their charge, Courtney, never Coco, refers to it, is by definition going to be reflected in one's choice to be involved with Buffy's deal or not.
Faith's journey through this issue is very awesome, and for the second time, we get very informative flashbacks about her -- this time, her "first time", the first vampires she killed. One of them got away. From her very first night on the job, Faith's pattern of believing she falls short of what she should be.
The Slayer Sanctuary is a brilliant concept, and its message is pretty clear -- you can't "unchoose" yourself and survive. You can't deny purpose, you can't ignore the world around you and your place in it and flourish. The Watcher that runs the "sanctuary" (actually, deathtrap), Duncan Fillworthe, thinks he deserves the hiding place even at the expense of the Slayers that came to him for shelter because, he, too, doesn't want to be part of the fight anymore since the world is just so ungrateful. One will pardon the expression after reading this issue, but apparently that IS exactly the type of wooly-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten. For him, and for every Slayer that came there. Ironically, fleeing the power that Buffy gave these girls drove these girls right back to the oppressive patriarchal structure of the Council, such as it was, and to their deaths.
Giles' seems to come into all this with certain misgivings about the idea of being "out" of the fight, as he's already enthusing about the possibility of Faith's example being what will inspire the Slayers in the Sanctuary to find their courage and rejoin the fight. I somehow doubt that's what Twilight had in mind, and this issue I think takes him out of suspicion.
It should have been raining -- when Giles, Faith, and Courtney take command of the murderous, undeserving townfolk of Hanselstadt (doesn't that mean death of Hansel? A bit on the nose isn't it? I'm assuming based on "kinderstadt"), it should have been raining. They are the message -- you don't stop the fight, not because you're scared, not because you think you deserve a break, and not even because you deserve the gratitude of the people you're protecting -- you fight because it needs done. "Safe" is in this way the convergence of and intellectual heir to both "Orpheus" and "Not Fade Away" from "Angel" as well as the entire vampires-in-public arc and the disbelief and doubt it creates in Buffy. If Faith and Giles survive, they'll be the role-models for who Buffy will have to be to stand against Twilight.
KingofCretins | April 01, 20:48 CET
I like that, KofC. Very well-put.
menomegirl | April 01, 20:55 CET
Hanselstadt = City of Hansel. (Notably not Gretelstadt or HanselundGretelstadt -- which given the German love for long compound words shouldn't be off-putting to Germans.)
Maggie | April 01, 21:08 CET
With Giles pretty much off the list for Twilight (if nothing else, what possible reason would there be for Twilight to, without using his powers, face down an army of pissed off hungry vampires?), that brings the list of credible suspects down to basically four -- all of which create nearly insurmountable logic or continuity problems.
KingofCretins | April 01, 21:13 CET
That said, these one-offs don't have nearly enough room for the awesomeness season 9 should contain. Which is why Faith and Giles need a mini-series.
Some very interesting character stuff. Giles regrets nothing! Faith's big regret had nothing to do with Sunnydale. They need to have a real confrontation with Buffy. Maybe something to do with pink-haired whatshername. It would be cool if Faith took her down, or got her to repent, or something, and then Buffy showed up.
And after all this time bringing up Jenny... oh, how I miss G/J, so cute. As much as I loved G/J, I would love Giles/Faith even more - even just some really good friendship moments would rock. Because together they kick. ass. Again, they need a mini-series. Or maybe a whole spin-off. It could be called Faith the Vampire Slayer: Tales of Awesome!
The explanation of the monster didn't make a whole lotta sense, why wouldn't the vampires just avoid the library?
Oh, and a big SO THERE! to everyone who thought that Giles resents Buffy and is teh evul.
blueanddollsome | April 01, 21:33 CET
Kris | April 01, 22:22 CET
BTW Kris: I've been subscribing to a bunch of comics via midtowncomics.com in NYC (they are too big to fail!).
embers | April 02, 00:02 CET
Emmie | April 02, 00:08 CET
patxshand | April 02, 00:20 CET
[ edited by Buffyfantic on 2009-04-02 00:24 ]
Buffyfantic | April 02, 00:23 CET
Pat, what story choices did you find odd? I'm going to guess that at least half the negativity in general is going to have to do with the still-raging arguments over the Slayer spell in general and the apparent fact that Joss, vis a vis the unfolding story, is not flinching away from it in the way that people expected when this arc began. The message of "Safe" is very plainly that trying to hide from the power or the fight is a vote for mass suicide, as it very literally got the Slayers that sought sanctuary killed.
KingofCretins | April 02, 00:42 CET
Am still pondering what I make of other aspects of the issue. But the contrast with NFFY is why my first reaction was one of disappointment.
Oh and if we're ranking the issues of this arc: 21/23, 24, 22.
Maggie | April 02, 00:48 CET
KingofCretins | April 02, 00:56 CET
On the regard of the out-dated letter... really, what is the point of posting them? Wouldn't it make much more sense to just post the reaction letters for the most recent comic released (ex: #23 letters in issue #24)? The way it's done makes no sense to me, and disconnects me from the editor (which seems to invoke the opposite of what they're trying to do).
korkster | April 02, 00:58 CET
Oh well. I guess they can't knock every single one out of the park, particularly when using writers who didn't work for show.
karosurly | April 02, 01:04 CET
patxshand | April 02, 01:29 CET
So far I would rank this arc as from favorite to least favorite.
#24,#21,#22,#23(I still can't stand Andrew so that is impacting my ranking).
Buffyfantic | April 02, 02:02 CET
vampmogs | April 02, 02:07 CET
Plot: Faith and Giles accompany new Slayer, Courtney, across Germany to pay a visit to a mysterious place dubbed the "Slayer Sanctuary". There they discover that the sanctuary is actually a sacrificial ground for unwilling Slayers. Yes... it's quite nonsensical
Art: Meh. Actually, more along the lines of meh-gack! It started out meh, then went towards gack. The one area that Cliff Richards always seems to earn praise is in his likenesses. Personally, I've never cared too much for his likenesses (they were serviceable, but with no charisma), and unfortunately for this issue, the same gripe surfaces. His Faith and Giles are serviceable at best... they bear a remote resemblance to the actors. But capturing a character goes so much deeper than just capturing the bone structure and proportions of a character. To truly capture a likeness, the character has to "act" like the real thing. The quirks, the charms, the mannerisms, the posture. Richards' characters don't act. They stand about and fake it.
Nevermind that... his landscapes fake it too. What's with all the flying scraps of paper?! Seriously. Go count how many panels feature scraps of paper billowing in the wind. The Germany I remember was insanely clean! Or at least I didn't see scraps of paper everywhere. Onwards anyway... usage of space... not one of Richards' strong points either. His panels fail to evoke any sense of space... they're always so claustrophobic with everything just kinda crammed in there. There are no details, and large rooms are always featureless. An example would be the town library. Instead of showcasing the cavernous space, the lofted skylit ceiling, we get rows and rows of identically sized books. Even the shelves are boring. The floor hopelessly drab. And in many of the panels... nothing at all. Much like his cavernous space in #10 where Buffy and Willow meet the Andy Warhol demon. It all boils down to a lack of creativity. Or at least a failure to translate. It's like the first Tomb Raider game when you look up at the ceiling and see just black, instead of the ceiling or the sky.
And finally... hydra-hair. Enough said.
Writing: I was hoping that #21 ("Harmonic Divergence") would be the low point of the arc, or even the entire season. Too bad, I'm sad. Where this fails is where it makes its leading lady feel like a recurring guest star instead of taking us deeper into what makes Faith tick. Even though Faith is featured prominently in the issue, she really doesn't say or do much that means anything. That makes it an utter waste of space for me. An even greater waste is the complete non-existence of character chemistry between Faith and Giles as partners. In fact, the partnership seems to have disintegrated, with Giles being all stuffy and commanding, and Faith reduced to pouting and mouthing off.
The tone is somewhat reminiscent of "Gingerbread", complete with the German demons. The plot is kinda nonsensical, but not much more than "Gingerbread", and some of the wackier episodes of seasons past. The premise behind a Slayer Sanctuary is intriguing, and the twist is kinda wicked, but it just doesn't pay off. There's just a complete disconnect between Faith and the events that transpire. She's just not there. That's a great fault of the writing. Where is the connection between the Faith who's regretful (and quite a bit guilty, judging from the words spoken by the manifestation of her fear) about letting one of her first vampires go, the Faith that then kills the demon, and the Faith at the end?
Verdict: Quite utterly fail!
[ edited by wenxina on 2009-04-02 02:43 ]
wenxina | April 02, 02:10 CET
FaithFan | April 02, 02:48 CET
Most disappointingly, we see Faith only in the thing's bad-memory thrall and then out of it. We never see the moment where she overcomes the thrall.
Where does the fire come from, after Faith hits it? I didn't understand what was going on there, with the slaying mechanics.
Sunfire | April 02, 03:20 CET
KingofCretins | April 02, 03:22 CET
wenxina | April 02, 03:31 CET
wonderflonium | April 02, 03:46 CET
As others have mentioned, Kruger is definitely no replacement for Brian K. Vaughan. I enjoyed the flashback for Faith to her first slayings, and Giles' immunity to the monster was amusing, but the rest was a wash for me. Giles should be having a much, much larger role in the whole Buffy organization than merely going on fun vacations with Faith to see a few confused Slayers. He is largely the last Watcher standing, and even though Buffy and co. know how to deal with the bad guys already, he would be better put to use training Slayers (which we already kinda saw before), heading research teams, or even really going on missions deemed too dark for Buffy, i.e. of the killing Ben to stop Glory nature. That's what I had the impression would happen with the team up between Giles and Faith... that the last Watcher and Slayer would be doing the dirty laundry for the Buffy organization. This story felt too small for Giles and Faith, both of whom are the most experienced of Buffy's people.
The whole message of fight-or-die for Slayers was a good one, but in terms of actual story entertainment didn't do anything for me. Those Slayers must be really lame to just continue to allow their numbers to be thinned while hiding out in that town, but I guess that was the point.
archon | April 02, 05:27 CET
And Wenxina said everything that needs be said about Cliff Richard's art.
Jeanty's work is so perfect for the series, it's a shame that he's unable to do every issue, but I understand and forgive him. Cause he needs my forgiveness, really. |-)~
I'd like to take a moment to point out that KoC's review did make me rethink a bit, and I appreciate that. But I remain unconvinced. KoC, your reviews (save for one, zing!) are always extremely appreciated and insightful!
bobw1o | April 02, 06:46 CET
The Giles/Faith relationship wasn’t as focused on as I expected it to be, but it was still great nevertheless. I really enjoyed how Giles tells Faith that she’s too hard on herself. Truer words were never spoken. I also greatly appreciated how he snapped at Faith to stop it, someone has to keep kicking her gear into butt. A lot like Buffy did for Angel in ‘Amends’ but perhaps even more so, how Cordy did for Angel in Ats. Faith and Angel are a lot a like in needing motivation to keep them from self wallowing.
It was great to see Faith’s first kill. We saw Buffy’s first kill and she succeeded (after she missed the heart) but Faith doesn’t manage to dust all of them. It reminds me a lot of when they’re falling down towards the pool in ‘No Future For You’ and both are praying they don’t get the shallow end. Buffy got the deep end, Faith got the shallow end. No surprises there. I think King was spot on about his analysis of that scene, it really was the beginning of Faith’s inferiority complex. The vampire she let get away. Makes how scorned she looks in ‘Revelations’ when Post calls her attack a “blunder” even more appropriate looking back on it. Just another wound Post rubbed more salt into. But I think there’s other layers with this scene as well. Not only is it the beginning of Faith feeling inferior but it’s also the first sign of her blasé attitude to slaying. It’s the first sign of what will become an increasing trend of “unannounced walkabouts” and being “uninterested in proper training.” Faith could have chased after him but she settled for the two she did manage to kill. Chasing after him would require too much effort.
The Giles/Duncan stuff was great and I was thrilled that they brought up Jenny Calendar. Throughout the years I’ve seen a lot of fans speculate that Giles may resent Buffy a little for “allowing” Angelus to kill her. Many speculated that it was the reason he couldn’t trust her in season seven. I’m not entirely against such speculation, I think in some ways it could indeed be accurate. However, this issue addresses that head on by having Duncan try and use this moment to sway Giles to his side. But he *rejected* it, he didn’t detest Buffy or slayers for what happened. Points for Giles and how great he was for brushing it off.
Courtney reminded me a lot of Buffy with her parental issues and missing the heart for the first time. Faith inspired this Buffy replica and made her believe, is it possible this is symbolic for what’s to come further down the line in season eight?
Faith really does seem like Angel's protégé in so many ways. Telling the other slayers that even though the townspeople were scum, they had to fight for them because that’s what they do, is very reminiscent of what Angel said regarding Knox. And I thought the ending was very uplifting with Faith standing with the humans ready to fight the vampires.
Overall a really solid issue. My favourite issue in a long while. I can’t wait to see Giles/Faith pop up again, I really love those two characters. I’ll be feeding off this issue for a while. I’ve already read it 3 times and am about to read it again, so much goodness! :D
vampmogs | April 02, 11:25 CET
Allycat | April 02, 16:56 CET
It pretty much reminded me of the pre-season 8 Buffy comics, the one Joss wasn't involved in at all. No characterization, no plot movement. Just "Here are characters you like, watch them do stuff."
[ edited by dingoes8 on 2009-04-02 18:09 ]
dingoes8 | April 02, 18:06 CET
KingofCretins | April 02, 18:34 CET
[ edited by Sunfire on 2009-04-02 18:41 ]
Sunfire | April 02, 18:40 CET
KingofCretins | April 02, 18:47 CET
Presumably Wes' dad is another surviving member.
Simon | April 02, 18:51 CET
The G/F relationship rang hollow, I felt little to no connection between them, and for a G/F issue there was so little time spent on their relationship that it was almost pointless having them in the story. Which actually wouldn't have mattered if the story really did anything for the season arc other than briefly mention the fact that some slayers may not want to be chosen, but then not even make this the focus of the story.
The story itself was pretty predictable when it made logic-sense, the monster was a bit too reminiscent of Stephen King's 'It' for me. Courtney was neither endearing nor instantly hateable, left me with a distinct 'meh' feeling where I couldn't care less about her parental issues or her near death. Way too many wasted panels on her.
Plus all the Faith character 'insights' failed to be insightful in any way for any longstanding Faith fan. I felt that the semi-failure of her first slaying would actually not be an issue for her after dealing with Kakistos back in FH&T and dealing with the guilt of letting her watcher die.
Agree with Sunfire about the mechanics of the demon's death too, what happened there? Did Faith have a magical exploding crossbow that shields the bearer from injury while destroying a massive hydra beast thing? I feel that was just lazy right there.
I want Jeanty back on art and some forward progression/charater development very soon please.
digupherbones | April 02, 19:08 CET
(I missed it myself at first, and thought she was just hitting a random tentacle. But no, if you look carefully, the demon does have a head.)
Then it exploded in a bright flash of light visible a mile away, leaving nothing but its jawbone and a few twitching severed tentacles behind.
stormwreath | April 02, 23:39 CET
Craig Oxbrow | April 03, 00:13 CET
On the one hand, the idea that all the girls called as Slayers have to fight or die is in and of itself illogical. Now, yes, yes, and yes, a comic book about a super-powered being who isn't in some sense a hero or villain or something along that continuum would not work, as a saleabels tory. But, int he larger world in which the comic is set, there's no reason to think that any number of people have super-powers and choose to simply lead quiet lives, or perhaps become super entertainers or politicians.
However, look at it for another perspective. I've often comapred the twilight storyline to X-Men's "Committee to Investigate Mutant Activity," and denounced both as a way of playing the old (and, If eel, tired) cliche of McCarthyist reigns of terror. and Is tillf eel thatw ay. However....
The mutant storyline and Joss's current World vs Slayers arc also hark to the Civil Rights Movement of the 60s. Unlike "suspicious leftists," whose differences were intellectual choices, both the mutants and the Slayers have a physical distinction which can't just be erased. Just like a black person, whatever his/her political or social beliefs could not ever be truly a disinterested party in civil rights struggles. Regardless of personal feelings, he/she would still live afterwards in a country that was either still segregated or now legally equal.
The same with the Slayers,w hether on team Buffy or any other palce. Twilight and the publicity machine he cranked up, will come looking for the Chosen Ones. "Girl X," will she or nil she, has to respond to that. And a case can always be made for solidarity. The super-strong young women can't just lie low or be quietly open, they'll eb froced intoa decision and the msot plausible way is, arguably, to join the group striving to give them a secure place in the world.
There's a second aesthetic aspect to this. Joss loves to (with apologies to John Calvin and John Knox for borrowing their language) "re-present" his themes. The main exposition is so often accompanied by a mirror (left for right) image, or a miniature version, or an analogue. And aren't the vampires surfacing and demanding recognition?
DaddyCatALSO | April 03, 01:37 CET
Does anyone else think Giles came off sounding like an idiot in this piece?
Giles' Dialogue:
1. "Slayer Sanctuary?" (Yes, Giles repeat what Courtney said in a 'stating the obvious' manner.)
2. "Tell me more about this Slayer Sanctuary." (Yes, please do so the story can move forward from your robotic dialogue.)
3. "We need to find this place." (No duh.)
4. "We just made it. This is the only train that reaches Hanselstadt. It's deep in the mountains." (Thank God you were here to tell us where we are, Giles, otherwise the audience would have to think for themselves without you here to point out the obvious...or maybe read a location bubble in the top corner so that you could actually sound like Giiiiiiiiles.)
5. "If these girls are hiding here, seeing you might get them back in the fight." (Again, thanks for expressing this in the most linguistically and intellectually simplistic way possible. 'Cause that's clearly in-character for you when written by Krueger.)
6. "Vampires. I don't understand. What are they waiting for?" (Wow, thanks for remembering to wear your glasses today Giles or we'd never have known that those were vampires out there and that they're all creepily waiting outside of town. No please, don't have an emotional reaction or an intelligent thought, Giles. You might hurt yourself. And I'm going to keep calling you Giles so that I remember that's who you're supposed to be.)
7. "You're too hard on yourself, Faith." (Good thing you brought your Chicken Soup for the Soul on the train, Giles. What would Faith have done without that sage advice?)
8. "Enough, Faith." (Brief. Yeah, it's better when you don't go on. Thanks.)
And I could go on but it's starting to bore me even more. Seems like Krueger took Giles' role as the exposition guy way too literally. I'd do the same for Faith, but I think it might make me cry.
The dialogue lacks zing, lacks character, lacks depth. Oh, and when did Faith start calling Giles "G"? She always seemed to go more towards the formal "Giles". And when did Giles become a guy who let anyone call him "G" without comment? How many times has Giles said "stop" to Xander for calling him "G-man"? Oh wait, that's right. We're not reading the true characters and their accompanying history like we did in No Future For You. We're reading a metaphoric tale that uses Faith and Giles as vehicles, pushing the characters down and molding them to the story til they're only recognizable by their names and the way Richards passingly draws their likenesses.
As for the vision the demon draws up to torment Faith with, "The Third" has got to be one of the lamest concepts ever. At least the First Evil had that source of all things bad and scary going for it. Faith being shit-scared by a measly little vampire in a vision makes no sense. If Krueger had used Kakistos or Faith's first watcher to torment her, now there would be some emotional bling to write home about. But "The Third"? Yawn. I mean, who'd be scared of the guy who won the Bronze medal anyway? You came in third? Next!
I'm not sure how Krueger did it, but he managed to make the edgiest characters in Buffy Season 8 right now - the rogue Slayer who saves the world her way and the watcher who's out there to help her, both fightin' that evil while dealing with their dark pasts - read like characters in a Disney version of a dark fairytale. Sigh. There are so many plot holes in this issue I can't even truly do it justice. Why do the villagers sacrifice their children instead of moving away? Why do the vampires all hang out right outside the town instead of going somewhere they can actually score a meal? Why does Giles sound like an idiot? Oh wait, that wasn't a plot hole. Sorry.
My hopes are high that Petrie will restore some shine to the story next month and I'm expecting a better translation to the comic medium than Espenson's initial foray because Petrie's work is always so visual (Buffy and Faith with knives at each other's throats, Spike kneeling on the ground looking up at Buffy in Fool For Love). Here's hopin'.
This was just...not good. Not only did Giles and Faith read as dumbed down, but I think I might have actually lost brain cells from the egregiously low expectations that Krueger has placed on the audience. My least favorite issue of Season 8 bar none.
[ edited by Emmie on 2009-04-03 07:36 ]
Emmie | April 03, 07:35 CET
Buffy: Oh! Oh, do you guys remember the Three? That's right, you never met the Three. Well, there was three...
Damn...oh well, I can still be sarcastic about the originality.
digupherbones | April 03, 12:44 CET
Capt. Logic | April 03, 15:29 CET
I admit, on further reading, I think better of what "Safe" evokes than what "Safe" actually is, but I think it's a brilliantly conceived theme and message with a merely mundane execution. I can think of several issues of Season 8 that one would have to say are worse, for instance, "Harmonic Divergence".
KingofCretins | April 03, 16:13 CET
Riker | April 03, 16:37 CET
What exactly about that thinking is "liberal"?
[ edited by barboo on 2009-04-03 19:39 ]
barboo | April 03, 18:11 CET
espalier | April 04, 01:31 CET
On a completely unrelated note, my comic book store guy said that no one is reading Blood and Trenches and I had to laugh. It looked so unappealing, but I'm wondering if anyone is actually reading it and if it's any good.
[ edited by xanderharris on 2009-04-04 04:18 ]
xanderharris | April 04, 04:15 CET
You know, it might have been interesting if they had set it in, say, Germany.
Because I don't know the hell where this is supposed to be. It has (as discussed previously) American trashcans, Oktoberfest spelled with a "c", Bäckerei misspelled in three different ways (note that the "Library" changes its name to "Backery" at the end), trash all over the place (very, very much not Germany), no cars -- (Germany has more cars per capita than the U.S.) -- and the clothes people wear look like Zarist Russia 1903. Look at those funny hats! What do Germans really wear? What Americans wear, stuff like jeans. I wonder where they got all of those shotguns in the end, because Germany has some of the strictest gun laws in the world. Oh, and pitchforks? I wonder if they go to the toilet in outhouses.
So much for suspension of disbelief.
Dark Horse just made a fool out of themselves and the Buffy franchise in the largest market in Europe. Way to go, guys. The artists obviously couldn't be bothered to do research and the editors couldn't be bothered to fact-check things like simple translations. This is the sort of shoddy work that gives American media a bad reputation in the world -- when my German friends are done drying their tears of laughter, they are going to get angry, and rightly so. If I were German, I'd stop reading the comic, period. This is downright insulting.
I'll be sending a list of the most obvious mistakes to the editors with the suggestion that this team is never allowed to write another episode.
scotws | April 04, 08:34 CET
The negative reviews are a mystery to me. I enjoyed this one more than a lot of the others.
cheryl | April 04, 14:03 CET
NimNams | April 04, 20:01 CET
SlayAlive Q&A on #24.
Sunfire | April 06, 03:51 CET
In this issue Faith revisits her own regrets and slays them. It looks to me like a way to show closure for Faith's dark-side persona. Maybe a little broad, but it also seems like a relatively low-exposition way to direct the story back to the murky Buffy/Faith relationship.
[ edited by fleem on 2009-04-06 14:08 ]
fleem | April 06, 14:08 CET
fleem | April 06, 19:34 CET
I really do hope they bring the "murky Buffy/Faith relationship" back to the forefront in upcoming issues, at least for a few panels. I felt that their last meeting in NFFY part 3 was too brief, and didn't really explain anything about where these two characters were with each other.
At the end of "Chosen," Buffy seems to have accepted that Faith is back on her side, but in NFFY, Buffy is right back to accusing Faith of being evil/against her/whathaveyou. I'm wondering if something happened between them from "Chosen" to "The Long Way Home" that would make Buffy react in such a knee-jerk manner, or if it's more of Buffy seeing the world and the people in it totally black and white.
I hope the writers give some kind of resolution to this soon!
kasadilla | April 06, 22:25 CET
The fact that Faith knowingly walks into a trap, but Giles has no inkling of this fact? Just doesn't make sense. Also, Courtney seems like a throw-away character.
I also didn't get a real sense for what Giles and Faith have been up to. I think it was said earlier in this post, but shouldn't these two be taking on some serious endeavors, rather than wandering around Europe kind of aimlessly? I don't get it, and it doesn't have any emotional resonance for me at all.
I sincerely hope the next issue is far better than this one. Ugh.
5X5B | April 06, 23:29 CET
KingofCretins | April 07, 03:12 CET
GhostsWatcher | April 07, 05:01 CET
Really, it's bringing us back to the Buffy/Angel recurring theme -- everyone casts his or herself as the good guy. The ex-watcher claims to be protecting the town, Faith, rescuing the slayers but possibly allowing the town to get overrun, killing her own regrets, at what expense? Willow, Buffy, Fray, Twilight. I could come up with more but I'm supposed to be working :)
[ edited by fleem on 2009-04-07 16:17 ]
[ edited by fleem on 2009-04-07 16:45 ]
fleem | April 07, 16:16 CET
And oh yeah, if anyone was wondering, I have no problem stating that I've read fanfiction that was better than this.
menomegirl | April 07, 19:48 CET
I'm very happy we're moving on to Petrie's issue and then the Retreat arc which is supposed to kick the action into high gear.
Emmie | April 09, 02:58 CET
patxshand | April 09, 07:48 CET
Though I will agree that some of Giles' dialogue was clearly there just to move the plot along. Kind of similar to Wash in Serenity: "We need to talk to Mr. Universe." "Let's get to the beacon." Though of course Wash had way more awesome dialogue in the movie, too.
UnpluggedCrazy | April 12, 01:35 CET
treenie | April 12, 13:59 CET
treenie | April 12, 14:03 CET
Also, in Bram Stoker's Dracula, vampires could walk in the sun. So that's not as much of a deal-breaker as it might seem.
[ edited by UnpluggedCrazy on 2009-04-12 17:51 ]
UnpluggedCrazy | April 12, 17:50 CET
Sunfire | April 12, 18:10 CET
Oh and.... OZ could ya, go on you know you wana.
treenie | April 13, 05:40 CET
luv4whedon | April 14, 20:03 CET
Vamps + daylight= bad.
(Bring back Oz and or Angel, flash back, dream spot. I'm open to options here.)
treenie | April 15, 12:21 CET
Re: Jane Espenson
The 4-issue Buffy:"Haunted" mini-series (pre-Season 8) is still the best thing she's written for the franchise in comic form. I can't remember if everything in it still fits into continuity (though I believe so, it simply requires the reader to buy into the idea that the essence of the Mayor lingered after he got blown up in "Graduation Day"), but I hugely appreciated it back when it was published. Felt like a good between Season 3 & 4 "summer break" fit for the series, though it shouldn't be read until after Season 4 for new viewers because of the major Initiative spoilers.
What else did Jane write for Buffy and/or Angel comics ? The Jonathan one-shot (I remember it being okay, given that it originally started off as blank comic with a couple covers for a prop in the "Superstar" episode), plus "Harmonic Divergence" (mostly poor, aside from the Latina slayer) ? Still eager for her next arc.
Kris | April 16, 23:19 CET
I really like the "Haunted" mini also, the mayor's
voice is very clear, and i like the perspective shift
away from the Scoobies.
Caveat: i didn't need to wait months and months.
espalier | April 20, 14:34 CET
This story is almost identical in plot (and even in monster) to the recent story arc in The Fantastic Four. I find that very odd.
redeem147 | April 24, 15:17 CET