SciFi.com talks to SF author Jerry Pournelle.
Pournelle mentions a Whedon/Pournelle/Larry Niven pitch that never came into fruition.
"Joss Whedon is very sharp. And he and I and Niven very nearly came up with a fantasy series, which I would have loved to have worked on, based on the notion "Suppose the magic came back. We live in this world right now, and all of a sudden, the mana is coming back, and nobody knows how to use it, because we haven't studied it in 15,000 years." But some people have natural talent, and it will turn out, and we had this storyline that there have been some wizards all along for thousands of years. They mostly make their living doing prestidigitation. Stage magicians. And that was going to be one of our major characters, this 30-something-year-old witch who learned to be a stage magician but has far more talent than her mother did, so she gets it right more often, and meanwhile, the magic's coming back; we're pumping oil out of the ground, we're bringing up ores from deep under the Earth, you know, most of those things have mana attached to it. We very nearly made a deal with Joss on that one, and that would have been fun. That one I would like to have done.'"
This sounds fab. Make it happen!
September 06 2003
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Numfar PTB | September 06, 15:54 CET
Simon | September 06, 17:35 CET
that have to put up with so many mediocre productions.
Linda | September 06, 19:49 CET
Now who could play the lead in this series in a year or two? Let me think...
whirligig | September 07, 06:33 CET
How does each person come to grips with their world suddenly having stuff in it that had been outside their perception? Will they be like Anne and do her own small part to help people, or will they be like Kate and let the reality of an evil underworld tear her apart inside? Will one accept a soul as a gift like Angel, or a curse like Darla? It all boils down to how one chooses to accept reality, and whether or not they'd see this 'magic' as a part of reality or as something to pretend away. We each make our own reality. One may not be able to choose what one is, but we do choose what we do with what we are. But for each person, there's a time when their perception of reality is what you and I take for granted, and then one day, sometimes before our eyes, there's evidence presented, and there's a realization.
Whedon's already explored all this stuff. I don't personally see how creating a new world, in which magic went away during the dark ages and happens to come back at ten o'clock next Sunday is going to really be all that big a change. Okay. Maybe it'd be kinda fun. However, he's got enough irons in the fire.
ZachsMind | September 07, 11:15 CET
Caroline | September 07, 14:23 CET
Simpleba | September 07, 23:54 CET
Of course, he obviously admires Joss, who is much more liberal artsy than Heinlein. <-- BIG OBVIOUS, right there. Look, an essay in the making: Heinlein and Whedon, Matter and Anti-matter.
bogu_salias | September 08, 02:27 CET
Imagine advanced technology landing on the shores of a third world nation, very publically, and all the adjustments and power struggles that ensue, all the major re-writes of how society behaves. An epic transition milieue.
Niven has written stuff like that before, he could pull it off.
ironclad | September 08, 08:47 CET