Zap2it asks 'Is a Buffy film wishful thinking or a hopeful possibility'?
This follows on from Emma Caulfield's comments that the idea of a Buffy reunion movie is "circling".
The interview was posted here a couple of days ago.
April 30 2009
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


The One True b!X | April 30, 19:46 CET
bubblecat | April 30, 19:48 CET
hacksaway | April 30, 19:50 CET
menomegirl | April 30, 20:05 CET
Sunfire | April 30, 20:10 CET
As much as I like Buffy, it's over. People need to deal with it.
For those who can't, there's comics.
For those who can't handle canon, there's Spike on Xander fanfic.
Enjoy.
;)
didifallasleep | April 30, 21:11 CET
Rowan Hawthorn | April 30, 21:15 CET
Is it wishful thinking? Yes
Is it a hopeful possibility? Yes
Is it worth never mentioning again if it means saving us from spander / xike fiction? Yes.
Sparticus | April 30, 22:40 CET
SteveP | April 30, 22:50 CET
barboo | April 30, 22:53 CET
If we allow gay marriage, we'll have to allow construction workers and vampires with souls to get married too!
Slippery slope, indeed!
didifallasleep | April 30, 22:54 CET
menomegirl | April 30, 23:49 CET
DaddyCatALSO | May 01, 01:34 CET
cheryl | May 01, 03:00 CET
madmolly | May 01, 03:05 CET
I mean, you can't be a Buffy fan and NOT want a continuation of the story with actors instead of drawings.
Riker | May 01, 03:54 CET
Sunfire | May 01, 04:22 CET
Riker | May 01, 04:53 CET
The only way a Buffy film continuation would be worth it is if it tackled something really HUGE (like Buffy/Angel/Spike triangle huge). Or a BtVS/AtS cast combination film (unfortunately without dear Andy Hallett).
I honestly think a lot of casual viewers would be disappointed if Angel and Spike weren't in it (and Illyria is quite popular). The Scoobies really weren't the main draws and that's all BtVS has nowadays. Faith is a bigger draw than the Scoobies.
I know Connor wasn't popular even in the fandom until recently (boo!), but I'd love to see them bring him in as part of Angel's core. Finally we could get a Buffy/Connor meeting. That alone is reason enough to bring the two casts together. And hey... Connor/Dawn, anyone?
A Fray film at least wouldn't leave non-fans in the blank about what is going on, could be thought of as a disconnected sci-fi film and could still mean something to BtVS/AtS fans.
NileQT87 | May 01, 06:42 CET
Seriously, why does everyone think that films are so great? The reason Buffy was so good was because of the storytelling enabled by it's episodic nature. The comics have now taken over that episode format and the story continues to develop. I for one would get nothing from a film and probably wouldn't go and see it.
digupherbones | May 01, 10:04 CET
crystalsinger | May 01, 10:07 CET
Not for me. At all.
Though I like her interaction with Giles in the comics. But that's the comics.
redeem147 | May 01, 13:05 CET
Pretty much the same one I was watching. :)
resa | May 01, 13:20 CET
...I'll pass, thanks. The comics are worlds above any such for me (since, y'know, the main characters really are the main draw as far as I'm concerned), and I'd even prefer the "Tales of the Slayers" anthology I and some others suggested back when talk of a spin-off was being seriously discussed.
Rowan Hawthorn | May 01, 13:44 CET
Let Down | May 01, 13:59 CET
The comics don't even come close to seeing live actors, acting, with all the things that go with it. No way, no how.
And I just always assume that it wouldn't just be the scoobies. Why would it? I would hope they would bring in Spike for sure, and anyone else that fits in the story from the Angelverse.
It would be a nice full circle for Buffy to go from movie, to TV, and back to movie. I'm not looking for closure, because I don't really want it to end but I would definitely like to see my favorite verse ever on a screen again. For me, the comics, though enjoyable, just can't compare.
And I don't think Faith is a big draw at all. In any random poll about favorite characters she never scores as well as Buffy, Willow, Spike or Angel.
Xane | May 01, 15:03 CET
redeem147 | May 01, 15:25 CET
It's the desire which is important, not the having. Or something like that.
quantumac | May 01, 17:02 CET
Sparticus | May 01, 20:39 CET
Riker | May 01, 20:58 CET