"Have you ever tried to clean an actual slate? You'll always see what was on it before."
May 12
2009
KC Star has an article about the Dollhouse.
The usual info is here, plus a short interview with writer-producers Liz Craft and Sarah Fain.
Jesusita
| Dollhouse
| 04:31 CET
|
12 comments total
| tags:
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
(SPOILER)
'Epitaph One' to be shown at Comic...
|
Anthony Stewart Head to appear on ...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
The One True b!X | May 12, 04:36 CET
The One True b!X | May 12, 04:39 CET
Bingo. I think that pretty much verifies what people have been talking about on some other current threads, and on whedonesque in general for so long - FOX getting in the way of Joss' Dollhouse vision until about "Man in the Street."
Seems pretty clear.
QuoterGal | May 12, 05:22 CET
[ edited by Pointy on 2009-05-12 05:46 ]
Pointy | May 12, 05:41 CET
Ballard, to me, is the most interesting character because inside the “Dollhouse,” he’s like the sanest man in the room, but outside of it he’s a total lunatic. It’s kind of natural that he would be invited inside and given employment.
Craft: That was always Joss’ plan. We worked toward that the whole season.
Fain: To me that’s one of the richest things to explore in a second season. What happens when he finds the girl? What happens when that same guy gets into the dollhouse? Does he get corrupted? That’s just fascinating to me.
Okay. I think I'm starting to get it.
The first season of Dollhouse was not actually about Echo or, for that matter, the Dollhouse at all. It was about Ballard (the lone man on the street) and his changing relationship with the Dollhouse itself.
Think about it. His is the only character who has been significantly affected by events over the entire season. Yes, other characters have had occasional glimmers of something simmering under the surface, but in the end the only one who is in a truly different place, has truly changed as a character has been Ballard.
So. Am I totally off the reservation here, or what?
[ edited by brinderwalt on 2009-05-12 06:12 ]
brinderwalt | May 12, 06:05 CET
As to change, I feel that the places we've seen November, Claire, Topher, Echo and Adelle get to are places worth exploring, and that they aren't where I, at the least, perceived them to be in the pilot.
Mercenary | May 12, 06:22 CET
beckyboo | May 12, 07:04 CET
I guess I should clarify here.
I'm not saying that Ballard was in any way the most important figure, but that he was the only character who actually completed a character development arc by season's end.
I agree on both points, but I think there is a finer point to be made here. November, Claire, Topher, Echo, Adelle, and Boyd for that matter have moved as characters from their original places, but (to use a physics term) haven't really changed their trajectories yet. The last 10-15 minutes of "Omega" was peppered with indications that many of them are on the cusp of such character development, but there just wasn't enough time to determine if the changes were going to stick. Ballard? There just seems to be absolutely no doubt in my mind that not only has he changed since the beginning, but, more importantly, has already been moving in a different direction as a character for a considerable amount of time.
[ edited by brinderwalt on 2009-05-12 07:28 ]
brinderwalt | May 12, 07:19 CET
MattK | May 12, 08:06 CET
Is this the first indication that every season will have a big bad like Alpha?
wiesengrund | May 12, 12:18 CET
Let Down | May 12, 12:23 CET
chazman | May 12, 14:09 CET