Could the tyranny of the Nielsen overnight ratings be over? If a network like Fox, which is not known for its sentiment and softness, renews a show like "Dollhouse," the paradigm has surely shifted.
May 16 2009
A Good Day for Unconventional Television.
The fabulous Maureen Ryan (@moryan) aka The Watcher has a new entry up about Dollhouse's renewal and what it might mean for network television in general.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


The way we watch shows is changing, and now a major network has signaled that they consider these changes widespread enough to warrant serious consideration for the finiancial viability of a project.
The key strategy for networks will probably always be to aim for mass appeal so that traditional advertising revenue can be generated, but the niche has just found a comfortable home in the business model. Nerds spend money like no other demographic, they buy the DVDs and double dipping special editions, they buy the toys and the games,they stream online and purchase episodes on itunes. You don't need a hit TV show to make money, you just need a small committed group of nerds.
Color me thrilled that the terribly outmoded Nielsen's system just lost a little steam, I just wish it had come in time to save Firefly or Pushing Daisies.
Cyclopticxander | May 16, 04:00 CET
Firefly Flanatic | May 16, 04:14 CET
I wholeheartedly agree that the Nielsen system is outdated and needs to be reformed. (I think the peeps at Nielsen know it too, given their recent moves to downplay the number of watchers that online media such as Hulu are generating.)
And it's really lovely that all these shows that came OUT of the writer's strike will continue to be 'carrying the banner' next season.
missb | May 16, 04:37 CET
Harmalicious | May 16, 04:51 CET
Succatash | May 16, 05:26 CET
Um. Hello?
The One True b!X | May 16, 05:27 CET
[ edited by Succatash on 2009-05-16 05:44 ]
Succatash | May 16, 05:40 CET
Arsenal | May 16, 05:51 CET
Let Down | May 16, 06:00 CET
Zeitgeist deserves a big round of applause for sticking to his guns and being right this whole time. Also, thanks to the first Save Dollhouse campaign for getting things done. Way to go!
Succatash | May 16, 06:22 CET
That is: most of us are not Nielson families. But we want to help Fox make money on this show so they keep renewing it. Can we explain that situation to them and ask them to advise us on what we can do that drive the metrics they care about? (i.e., do they want HULU views? iTunes sales?)
We can speculate, but why not ask Fox directly and act as a team? They're on our side.
SteveP | May 16, 06:25 CET
onthedrift | May 16, 06:37 CET
The One True b!X | May 16, 06:46 CET
Shmuel | May 16, 07:04 CET
nyrk | May 16, 07:33 CET
Ameer | May 16, 07:58 CET
Unless the show is very cheap to produce, I doubt this is true or will become true in the near future. Let's not overestimate the revenue potential of nerds in the way that Universal overestimated the ability of fan-directed word of mouth to get people into theaters for Serenity.
Likely the revenue potential of alternate distribution channels was one of a host of factors which affected Fox's decision. But if the ratings don't go up in Season 2, both Dollhouse and the new paradigm will look less attractive.
janef | May 16, 09:37 CET
Ditto. I have the time, just not the funds. Yet another event I miss out on.
electricspacegirl | May 16, 11:15 CET
Hunted | May 16, 12:48 CET
And what about FOX on Demand? I like the way you think, SteveP.
ActualSize | May 16, 14:25 CET
zeitgeist | May 16, 15:10 CET
I can't exactly condemn anyone for thinking like that though. I'm definitely guilty of this 'wait and see' attitude these days although I live in the UK so I'm not exactly damaging the ratings by not watching straight away. Still, if I did live in the US I imagine I'd probably have a similar outlook. I really hope that what has happened here with Dollhouse and to an extent with The Sarah Connor Chronicles (a couple of seasons back I really can't see how that show would have been given a full second season on Fox) is the start of a new way of thinking for the networks that just might generate an equally hopeful and positive response from the viewing public and that this will lead to less examples of the likes of Firefly. We can hope, at least.
Darkest Soul | May 16, 15:57 CET
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8053531.stm it's half way down as 'SciFi Surpise'
:D
The Do That Girl | May 16, 17:56 CET
The One True b!X | May 16, 18:00 CET
The Do That Girl | May 16, 18:18 CET
Personally FOD stinks in regards to viewing on-line. It's always lagging and there's no way to make it better. At least with Hulu, you can pause and let it buffer in more. I think it might actually be better to just promote Hulu on the Fox site and take down the FOD. Anyone else have this problem?
korkster | May 16, 23:37 CET
Rachelkachel | May 17, 05:49 CET
Simon | May 17, 07:37 CET
The One True b!X | May 17, 08:37 CET
I say this is the turning point where everyone makes a change in how we think. Stop thinking of Fox and the television conglomorate as our enemy. As SteveP said:
We can speculate, but why not ask Fox directly and act as a team? They're on our side.
mariec | May 17, 20:32 CET