May 28 2009
TV Without Pity on Buffy Movie, actresses for the role, and directors.
TWoP suggests actresses and directors for the rebot.
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.

Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.


the Groosalugg | May 28, 01:03 CET
Also the idea of Kristen Stewart playing Buffy is very upsetting. No offense to the actress, she's just associated too strongly with Twilight.
jkalderash | May 28, 01:08 CET
DaisyButtercup | May 28, 01:08 CET
They should think about a Watcher, too. I had suggested John Larroquette, although we ought to think about Michael Emerson or Ray Wise (yep, a Devil who now does the Lord's work and has great suits). Olivia Williams would also be great, but she's busy. Anybody have other suggestions on that role?
[ edited by impalergeneral on 2009-05-28 01:25 ]
impalergeneral | May 28, 01:19 CET
I think I've heard her say she hated the movie and only did it for the money, if that helps...
It probably doesn't, though.
Chrisham2 | May 28, 01:22 CET
If this movie doe get made (which it probs will do) I hope that Buffy's sarcastic attitude will show through more (like in season 1) because i loved her attitude towards her duty. She was cocky (in a good way) and for good reason.
I really hope Kristen Stewart or Megan Fox do not get involved with this, especially because: Kristen Stweart is associated with Twilight and no offence but i dont think she could play a kick ass role,And what is it with Megan Fox being considered for every kick ass female in a reboot? First Tomb Raider and now this? Something is seriously going wrong with the world. Megan Fox cannot play this part.
I think that Buffy would be better as a blonde because already there are brunette played characters in the Twilight movie adaption and The Vampire Diaries TV Series adaption. In VD the girl is originally blonde, but TV series, not so much.
There is a reason behind Joss Whedon choosing Buffy as a young blonde girl and its because he kept seeing that young blonde girl getting killed in those teen horrors and he wanted her to basically, fight back.
[ edited by gingyfromshrek on 2009-05-28 01:40 ]
gingyfromshrek | May 28, 01:27 CET
cronopiogal | May 28, 01:43 CET
The Xan Man | May 28, 01:46 CET
Please buy all of the rights to Buffy and stop this atrocity before it goes any further.
Thank you.
Amanda0 | May 28, 01:47 CET
Leaf | May 28, 01:52 CET
Rowan Hawthorn | May 28, 02:08 CET
Squishy | May 28, 02:10 CET
She's only 22, which maybe young enough to play the part and she plays can play a kick ass fighter. Check out her role in Supernatural season 3, she plays an awesome part :D
[ edited by gingyfromshrek on 2009-05-28 02:16 ]
gingyfromshrek | May 28, 02:12 CET
Squishy | May 28, 02:16 CET
Nebula1400 | May 28, 02:18 CET
We've had Shock, Denial, Anger. Is this Bargaining?
So just Depression and Acceptance to go?
zz9 | May 28, 02:31 CET
knitgrrl | May 28, 02:33 CET
brinderwalt | May 28, 02:39 CET
Squishy | May 28, 02:48 CET
She already has the outfit.
redeem147 | May 28, 02:53 CET
I think so lol
gingyfromshrek | May 28, 03:12 CET
Danielle Savre -- ("Heroes" Season 1) -- obscure, young, right look, but talented enough?
Alona Tal -- ("Veronica Mars", "Supernatural") -- perfect look, talented, but at 26, already too old for a relaunch?
Hayden Panettiere -- ("Heroes") -- the right look, proven genre cred, young enough, but is she already too familiar as Claire?
Anna Kendrick -- ("Twilight") -- if you're going to cash in on "Twilight", cash in on "Twilight", right? Her look is almost more Charisma's Cordy than Sarah's Buffy, but she's pretty, young, and her role in "Twilight" had a sort of squint-and-she's-Buffy personality. But is it a gimmick?
Olivia Thirlby -- ("Juno") -- Got the comedy chops, young enough, but too much "indie" cred to slum it in a genre flick?
(If I were going to rank these 5, I'd say 1) Tal, 2) Thirlby, 3) Panettiere, 4) Kendrick, 5) Savre.)
Scriptwriters with no ties to Joss: David Goyer, Diablo Cody.
[ edited by KingofCretins on 2009-05-28 03:15 ]
[ edited by KingofCretins on 2009-05-28 03:17 ]
KingofCretins | May 28, 03:14 CET
Squishy | May 28, 03:23 CET
Diablo Cody just wrote a zombie movie that's also apparently a high school comedy, so... well, y'know.
KingofCretins | May 28, 03:25 CET
zz9 | May 28, 03:29 CET
gingyfromshrek | May 28, 03:31 CET
Lockescythe | May 28, 03:44 CET
Chrisham2 | May 28, 03:46 CET
We've had Shock, Denial, Anger. Is this Bargaining?
So just Depression and Acceptance to go?
How about a new one - Avoidance? My internet break of almost a whole day wasn't long enough. This still sucks.
*broods*
[ edited by ShanshuBugaboo on 2009-05-28 03:48 ]
ShanshuBugaboo | May 28, 03:48 CET
In terms of casting, Thirlby might be the best choice from among known commodities, but I still think an unknown might be the way to go. Someone who can look like the cheerleader, without being soft or vapid, and at the same time deliver the one-liners while kicking ass. Hayden Penettiere I think would be a big mistake. She has no edge, no dark side, and no sly wit.
See, I think the Buffy movie today might actually work, and could attract much stronger talent than it did in the early nineties. The difference is that we now have the show to back up the concept. Joss has already shown that the Buffy premise is pure gold when properly executed. And a lot of great young writers today are fans of the show (see, e.g., BKV), and I would suspect a lot of smart actors are too.
[ edited by Squishy on 2009-05-28 03:53 ]
[ edited by Squishy on 2009-05-28 03:58 ]
Squishy | May 28, 03:51 CET
OMG! This is so similar to what Georges said our reaction would be to finding out who Twilight is that the hair on the back of my neck is standing up. I also remember "Shame" being in there...
I guess we have our answer. Twilight is Fran Rubel Kuzui. It isn't the end of magic Twilight is after at all. It's the end of the magic that is Buffy.
cheryl | May 28, 03:57 CET
Jorge Garcia.
redeem147 | May 28, 03:58 CET
And please. Not Hayden Panettiere. She's infected with the Heroes virus now.
Progressive_Stupidity | May 28, 04:24 CET
Harmalicious | May 28, 04:26 CET
fruit punch mouth | May 28, 04:31 CET
Squishy | May 28, 04:50 CET
I'm still not looking forward to it, in contrast to the Tim Burton-Johnny Depp remake of Dark Shadows, for which I do hold out some hope.
Eileen | May 28, 05:02 CET
cabri | May 28, 05:05 CET
cheryl | May 28, 05:10 CET
That's about summarises how I feel about that remake.
Effulgent | May 28, 05:13 CET
We've already had several threads to jump up and down and go "Wah!", this thread is about how they would cast the movie if they were stupid enough to make it.
[ edited by cabri on 2009-05-28 05:14 ]
cabri | May 28, 05:13 CET
[ edited by Effulgent on 2009-05-28 05:15 ]
Effulgent | May 28, 05:15 CET
I'm taking Joss at his word and "hoping it's cool." A good cast and good crew and good script would go a long way to making sure it is, in fact, "cool".
KingofCretins | May 28, 05:18 CET
Worst case scenario, we get a crap movie, and the series continues to appear brilliant, and even more so by comparison to the crap movie. Best case scenario, we get an awesome reimagining of one of my favorite shows ever. Again, to paraphrase Xander in Tabula Rasa: "Me like Buffy. Me glad."
Squishy | May 28, 05:28 CET
FTR, I love Buffy. Joss's Buffy. SMG as Buffy. The Buffy who has a mother, A Watcher as the father figure, a core group of friends and a couple of souled vampires.
King...I don't believe that Joss is just skipping down the street cool with this development. What is he going to say? Publically?
That makes sense Cabri, thanks.
cheryl | May 28, 05:41 CET
Now, Vertigo has produced at least three movies with Sarah Michelle Gellar, so maybe she could realistically be involved, but I doubt as the lead. That would sure be a huge fight in the fandom, for Sarah to be doing a Buffy movie that Joss isn't involved in.
I'm sticking with Alona Tal or Olivia Thirlby as my favorites for it.
[ edited by KingofCretins on 2009-05-28 05:52 ]
KingofCretins | May 28, 05:47 CET
I have seen nothing to suggest that SMG is involved with this in any way. Until I do, I won't entertain the notion.
cheryl | May 28, 06:06 CET
Simon | May 28, 07:19 CET
Just not, yanno, in California?
CrazyKidBen | May 28, 07:51 CET
xerox | May 28, 09:45 CET
Ildeth | May 28, 10:07 CET
Haven't we suffered enough with remakes? Remakes, for the sake of profit?
Archduke Sebassis | May 28, 10:36 CET
Now that we've got that out of the way, I'll just say this: The reactions to this "reboot" news (you know, the one where apparently the world will now surely end in a biblical apocalypse?) has been kind of ridiculous, in my opinion. I mean, as I'm to understand it, this is just someone wanting to do their own Slayer story, not about Buffy or anyone else from previous incarnations. Kind of like a Tales of the Slayers installment. And what about countless fan fiction stories? Nobody seems to have a problem with those. Hell, I've even written some myself. Or, what about productions that ARE about Buffy, like BBtL? None of that has any involvement from the original cast, writers or creators. Stage performances of Dr. Horrible? People seem to love those.
Now, I know what you're going to say, "But, but, no! See, that's all made with love from the fans!" Well, how do we know the writing and/or directing duties aren't going to end up in the hands of some mega-fan? Somebody who's dreamed for years of the opportunity to play in the world of the Slayer mythology? Remember, there was a time when Drew Goddard was a humble fanatic about Buffy, and look what happened there.
I'm not saying that's GOING to happen, just that it COULD. Why so cynical and pessimistic? We live in a world where a Bollywood version of "Fight Club" not only exists, but has done quite well for itself. Did it ruin the original movie or book? No (at least, in my estimation). How about the musical adaptation of Spider-Man, with the big name performers?
I have no clue in regards to the outcome of all this, but I'm also not going to immediately assume the absolute worst. I just can't live that way. Putting such negative energy out there like that is like willing it to be bad and fail, like saying, "I'm not going to pass the big test tomorrow." Well, of course not. Not with THAT attitude. :)
kungfubear | May 28, 10:46 CET
I probably shouldn't love Lilo and Stitch as much as I do but pff :p
Ashley | May 28, 11:13 CET
Just not, yanno, in California?
Ha ha ... sniffle.
This topic is hilarious. But really, I don't see the bad in it. I'm envisioning a gazillion reviews that say: "skip this movie, watch the series."
catherine | May 28, 14:23 CET
I think what I find interesting here is that I'm thinking of this in the context of Season 8. Since Season 8 started, I've seen people pile on about how Joss has lost the characters or the story, how they read better fanfic, how it needs actors, etc. AND YET, here's this movie, which is basically fanfic-with-budget in terms of the Joss canon, without Joss (who supposedly lost his touch with it anyway)... I mean, this should be the Season 8 hater's dream, shouldn't it?
KingofCretins | May 28, 15:06 CET
Zannadoo | May 28, 16:36 CET
On the one hand, I don't want to support this movie even one tiny bit.
On the other hand, if they hire BKV to write it - who is very high on my 'favorite writers' list, and already associated with Joss through the comics - I might actually have to watch it. But my lack of faith in this reboot is such, that I don't believe for one tiny minute they'll hire quality people. Hell, for all we know, Kuzui'll end up directing and messing this thing up all over again.
Also, I'm with Simon. I've pretty much had it with this movie. Wouldn't mind not reading about it and not discussing it for a while. At least untill we get actual confirmation on things. I'm still mostly hoping it'll just go away.
GVH | May 28, 17:06 CET
She was Sophie on In Treatment. She kills!
Dana5140 | May 28, 18:12 CET
jamesthegill | May 28, 21:05 CET
It also is just a wee bit icky - no matter how legal - to have Joss currently writing & supervising "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" Season 8 in comics, and have these people announce they want to do their own reboot movie without so much as talking to him first.
If it had been that Joss wasn't currently working on anything Buffy, and if it had been anyone *other* than those two, I think fan reaction would've been much less volatile, overall.
And "Bargaining" didn't work out too well, in a way that is fairly apropos to this conversation. ;)
kalia | May 28, 21:08 CET
All this Rebuffy nonsense has me waivering between suicidal and homicidal feelings. Homicidal is currently winning.
The Do That Girl | May 28, 21:14 CET
Tycho | May 28, 23:59 CET
Dana5140 | May 29, 00:45 CET
Okay. That I would have to see. I'd pay money and everything.
redeem147 | May 29, 01:20 CET
Well, you finally convinced me to seek out some of her work on the old 'tube, Dana after mentioning Sophie here, oh, I guess, a couple of times or so ;). And although I've now only seen a couple of her scenes out of context of the episodes themselves, she does seem like a very talented actress. Somewhat remeniscent of Claire Danes in My So-Called Life, I feel based on these few impressions. I think she'd be a great choice. And as such, she obviously won't get picked by Kuzui ;)
GVH | May 29, 02:26 CET
Simon | May 28, 07:19 CET
Thank you, great goddess and god and all the lords of Kobol (and Simon, of course). And could you make that for a few decades, unless contracts are signed? ;)
I've refused to read anything but the first brief announcement, but gave in to curiosity and checked out the comments on this one.
Denial, bargaining, whatever .... nooo, just total disgust. That's it, back to join the Lalala'ers, fingers firmly in ears.
Shey | May 29, 13:30 CET
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.