July 22 2009
Christian Kane talks about the late, great Andy Hallett.
"Andy was a great friend of mine. We went all over Europe together. He was a good friend and a really good guy…It's hard for me to talk about, I get really choked up... He was such a great guy and I really hate that he passed".
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


geratongs3000 | July 22, 17:33 CET
VaughnOfTheDead | July 22, 17:37 CET
dzr | July 22, 17:44 CET
jamesthegill | July 22, 17:53 CET
geratongs3000 | July 22, 18:05 CET
newcj | July 22, 18:07 CET
geratongs3000 | July 22, 18:10 CET
Oh and I thought that Christian was saying that LINDSAY didn't want to get killed by the Gay Karaoke demon, but that he (Christian) felt that his character couldn't have been killed off by anyone better. I don't see how this ends up being anything negative about Christian.
embers | July 22, 18:23 CET
I wonder though if he (or other people who do the same thing) realizes how much he tells us about working on other shows (like Angel) when he says stuff like
Makes you wonder what it was like on the Angel set.
resa | July 22, 18:25 CET
I also have a feeling that this interview would have felt very different had it been in an audio/video form.
Jayme | July 22, 18:40 CET
geratongs3000 | July 22, 18:50 CET
That might possible be the best description of Eliot Spencer I've heard thus far.
Nice interview but there are typos and misspellings in it. For one thing, it's Lindsey, not "Lindsay". *grumps*
I was going to link this Television Without Pity interview earlier but seeing as how Simon has a CK thread already, I thought I'd leave it here in comments. He talks a bit about "Angel" there too.
And also, a nice article about the band's gigs at Dante's: Christian Kane Rocks Portland, Oregon.
[ edited by menomegirl on 2009-07-22 22:43 ]
menomegirl | July 22, 19:39 CET
Eh. Not really. Lest we forget, being an actor is a job; it's nice when you can have fun with it but the fact remains that, like any job, you are paid to be there and do what your bosses tell you (and if you're an actor on a big TV show you get paid a helluva lot more than most people get to do THEIR jobs). The producers don't owe you a good time; with serendipitous casting you might get one as a bonus, but off-screen chemistry is very much a secondary consideration. Anyway, if Christian has hard feelings about his time on AtS he's been very quiet about it. Here it sounds like he's trying to sell his current project as special, which he should.
Also, while ad libbing might be fun for actors, done wrong it just wastes film and miffs the show runners; as the DVD commentaries on Leverage point out, Leverage is shot in digital so they have a lot more leeway in retakes or keeping the camera going before and after shots to catch actor improvs. Buffy and Angel were shot on film (or tape, I forget; either way, an exhaustible medium) with lots of post-production to be accomplished in 22-episode seasons with intricate trans-episode story lines. If I were making those shows, as much as I like the zaniness of good actors, I would squash ad libs, too.
Plus, Christian was guest star on Angel (albeit a fairly frequent one) and I don't care what kind of show you're making, improvs are not welcome from guests--you can pitch ideas if you think you have a good one, but wrecking a take because you think you know better than the producers what the show's about is a good way to make sure you don't get work there or anywhere else for a good while. All told I think this is a nice little interview from Christian on what seems to be a very fun show on and off screen; I'm glad he's having more fun now than ever, but let's not read too much into it.
LeafOnTheWind | July 22, 19:45 CET
VaughnOfTheDead | July 22, 19:59 CET
menomegirl | July 22, 20:07 CET
ManEnoughToAdmitIt | July 22, 20:35 CET
I don't think Christian was really trying to say anything about the set of Angel, because I can bet that Whedon and his writers would not be considered egomaniacs.
bknick | July 22, 20:37 CET
Peanut Noir | July 23, 00:45 CET
bee | July 23, 04:06 CET
menomegirl | July 23, 04:25 CET
geratongs3000 | July 23, 04:58 CET
I was always ambivalent on that one.
[ edited by azzers on 2009-07-23 05:46 ]
azzers | July 23, 05:32 CET
starpulse.com
Christian's video blog on myspace
IF Magazine interview
RavenU | July 23, 13:24 CET
geratongs3000 | July 23, 14:03 CET
And yep, Andy Hallett is sadly missed (just by we fans so how much worse it must be for his friends and family ?).
As to the scene in question, it makes sense to me that Kane (and Lindsay) would rather have been killed by the main hero and star of the show (especially given that he and David Boreanaz are apparently pretty good mates in real life) and it also makes sense that Andy Hallet might've felt Lorne's final act was too far from the character as he knew him and found that difficult to play in the same way that SMG felt at a certain point in season 6 that they were straying too far from Buffy. As has been recounted a few times, Joss agreed with SMG but he seemingly didn't with Andy and felt it was the more impactful "end" for Lorne. FWIW, I agree, Lorne killing Lindsay was perfect for "Angel", as was the whole of 'Not Fade Away' IMO.
Saje | July 23, 15:40 CET
Little Green Kid | July 23, 23:09 CET
OzLady | July 25, 22:10 CET
bee | July 25, 23:34 CET