August 04 2009
Total Sci-Fi's 100 greatest science fiction movies.
Serenity comes in at no. 88 and gets praised for its witty, snappy dialogue.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


zz9 | August 04, 11:37 CET
[ edited by Let Down on 2009-08-04 12:53 ]
Let Down | August 04, 12:09 CET
I don't know if it belongs on this list, but I've always wanted to see Max Headroom: 20 Minutes into the Future. I loved the American t.v. show. Was the movie any good?
BreathesStory | August 04, 12:38 CET
Break_Atmo | August 04, 13:02 CET
bivith | August 04, 13:06 CET
twinkle | August 04, 13:26 CET
That said, because it's so broad there're quite a few gems on there that almost never get any props on these lists (like 'A Boy and his Dog') and though i've seen most of the list (though my foreign films count is woeful) there're also a few that i'll seek out now to take a look ('The Quiet Earth' sounds interesting for instance). And they've also made a concerted effort to look back through sci-fi's history rather than pick from the last 20 years just because they're easier to remember, which is also laudable IMO.
(and i'm going to see 'Moon' tonight so if it actually deserves to be above 'Dark City' and 'Serenity' i'll be a very happy bunny ;)
Saje | August 04, 13:29 CET
Dana5140 | August 04, 14:01 CET
Some I saw many years ago and hardly remember them - I do remember I really liked "Trancers" when I saw it, but that was many years ago (like 30) so I don't know how I'd feel about it now.
It's all down to personal taste but I agree with bivith:
A lot of terrible to average films way too high on that list. I like Total Recall, but I wouldn't place it on any best list. As for Independence Day, eugh
I haven't seen the new Star Trek movie yet (when it is released on Blu-Ray I'll see it). I think Serenity, Galaxy Quest, and Twelve Monkeys should all be higher on the list too.
Overall it looks like a good list.
Edited to change count of movies seen (forgot I saw Moon until I read the description)
[ edited by Passion on 2009-08-04 14:04 ]
Passion | August 04, 14:02 CET
I would Dana5140, except that'd mean you watched one Tarkovsky and then voluntarily watched another (kidding fans of his, the original 'Solaris' is definitely a film I intend to watch again, now that i'm not a bored 17 year old sitting through it in Film Studies ;).
In all seriousness, I could easily believe any lifelong sci-fi fan over 40 having seen all or most of those (if you exclude the foreign movies i've seen all of them bar 5 or 6, it's not really an "out there" list, a lot of the usual suspects that most fans will have seen are on there).
Saje | August 04, 14:16 CET
Dark City at 75? The beautiful but spotty The Fountain at 50? Star Trek 6 THIRTY spots better than the new Star Trek? Barbarella over 12 Monkeys?
And that's just with a cursory glance. What an unholy mess...
brother_grady | August 04, 14:57 CET
ThorpeWithoutShrimp | August 04, 15:14 CET
I can't comment on many of them, not having seen a third of those, but I'll chime in for Minority Report not being that much underrated. It was a good movie, but not one of the greats. And Dark City, I just rewatched it and it was painful experience, the average length between cuts was ander 2 seconds and it shows. Give me Serenity and its long steady shots any day over that! Also, I think I'll have to give Tarkovsky a new try, I remember disliking Stalker alot during high school, opposed to the book which I liked.
Eerikki | August 04, 15:42 CET
Personally, I favor Aliens over Alien, though I think the latter is better made. I love Dark City, think Terminator is good, enjoy Minority Report (the only Tom Cruise movie I can stand), and don't think much of pretty much all of the Star Trek movies. I am not a huge fan of Anime as well. Anbd I smile whenever I watch Tron.
Dana5140 | August 04, 16:01 CET
Guilty Pleasure: I think that "The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms" and "Earth Vs The Flying Saucers" are two great Ray Harryhausen efforts that should have been included.
TDBrown | August 04, 16:54 CET
marymary | August 04, 18:07 CET
"Alien 11 spots over the best action movie of all time Aliens?"
If often seems to come down to personal taste in genre for those two (sci-fi/survival-horror or sci-fi actioner), or director (Ridley Scott vs. James Cameron). And if you were a child or ADD-ish teenager when you saw either of them, that can have an effect on which one you more strongly bond with too (as a kid, I bet I would've liked Aliens way more than the first one, but I didn't see any of them until I was in my early 20s, aside from maybe a few scenes of the third one in my early teens)
I appreciate both, but saw Alien first and it just seemed...smarter and overall more enjoyable. It felt like there were a lot of stupid characters and a heap of stupid dialogue in Aliens, but I've only seen all the Alien films once (except for the second crossover movie with Predator, didn't see that). It was great to see Ridley kick ass and bond with Newt (although that is unfortunately undermined by what the third film does and, because they're a pretty cohesive series up until #4, #3's choices do effect how I feel about #2).
A case of where a sequel should be above its originator in this case, IMO, is T2 above the first Terminator. I like the original a lot too, but c'mon...lightyears better and building on the foundation of the first the best a big explosive Hollywood action flick possibly could've.
Surprised and happy to see The Fountain on there. Hugh Jackman should've got an acting nom for that one, but it was mostly ignored.
Blade Runner doesn't deserve the top spot. The design is great (and I'm a sucker for most of Ridley Scott's output, I admit--I love Legend) and Harrison Ford is great (actually most of the cast is quality--Rutger Hauer's speech/scene at the climax is perfect and sad too), but after finally watching it last year...it's just not all that. I can see how it was for its time though.
Really need to see 2001, Metropolis, Brazil, Tron, The Thing, A Scanner Darkly, Dune, and Flash Gordon (I just finished the `70s cartoon on DVD--it's my kinda pulpy camp sci-fi). Everything else on the list I've either seen, don't know what it is, or I have the (possibly false impression) that it's too old, cheesy, and black & white to care about (hey, I'm not completely against those--I've seen the original Godzilla and Metropolis is on the must-watch list).
Would also like a potential re-watch of Cocoon. I know I saw one of them as a kid (dunno if it was the first or the sequel).
Kris | August 04, 21:16 CET
Probably seen 60-70 of the movies on here (thank you Emerson College). Obviously Serenity should be higher but glad it is on there. Good list, will definitely have to check out some of the 1960's-1970's ones that I've missed.
E-Rawk | August 04, 21:37 CET
ETA: Actually, hokum's the wrong word. I dunno, it's almost a kind of knowing exploitation film. Hard to describe but worth a watch.
...but after finally watching it last year...it's just not all that. I can see how it was for its time though.
Well that's the thing, you actually kind of can't. I guess with sci-fi when a film comes out is more important than for a lot of other genres. The best of them comment on the times so when the times change, the impact of the film is lessened. Also, sci-fi is partly about novelty (we'd never really seen a future-noir city so well realised before) so if you see it years after, when the imagery is appearing in adverts and countless other films, again, impact lessened.
Re: Alien/Aliens, they're completely different sorts of films (sci-fi horror and action) with different conventions and different ways for the characters to make mistakes. They're both really well realised within their genres though IMO, I love them both.
[ edited by Saje on 2009-08-04 22:00 ]
Saje | August 04, 21:52 CET
I kind of wish Serenity was higher, but like I said, I haven't actually seen most of the films I'd be putting it above. Same for Eternal Sunshine, The Fountain, and A Clockwork Orange. Nice to see 2001 so high, though. Quite possibly my favourite film ever.
Racoon Boy | August 05, 08:15 CET
There are many movies i would put on that list far higher, or even put them, actually, in. Seconds, for example, is a Frankenheimer masterpiece. Quatermass and the Pit belongs in the top ten. The original Blob should be there too. Nausicaa of The Valley of the Wind deserves top ten too. Paprika. Phase IV by Bass is another classic. . Also the original War of the Worlds. Little shop of Horrors, original and musical remake. The original the thing. Big movie. The TRuman Show.
Those are real classics.
Darkness | August 05, 13:08 CET
I remember when Blade Runner was released it got panned by the critics and it bombed at the theather (I went to see it, I remember people telling me it sux, why would I want to see it?) I liked it (except for the naration)
What is really funny to me is that we are saying things like "for its time, movie "x" was great". Then we have Clockwork Orange, which still holds up and it is older than many of the films on the list. IMO it should be at the top of the list.
Edited to add the internet wasn't widely used back when T1 was released. I know it existed but not in a form anywhere near how it exists now.
[ edited by Passion on 2009-08-05 13:38 ]
Passion | August 05, 13:35 CET
In that respect I reckon 'A Clockwork Orange' benefits from being quite unusual in look and feel (and in some ways ahead of its time, possibly partly why it was banned in a few places) - nothing's come after to really dilute its impact whereas e.g. 'The Terminator' has had 3 sequels and numerous imitators (plus it's more special effects driven). In some ways it's time/place less in the same way that period films can be (even down to the language).
That said, as far as I can tell it's only actually Kris that's said that so far ;).
(though I still maintain timing is an important factor. Watch 'A New Hope' today and you judge it as a space opera, just one among many in a lot of ways - you can describe in words but you can never really convey the feeling of watching that star destroyer just keep going and kind of knowing, even as a child in my case, that sci-fi films had changed forever. Ironically in that case, by updating a 40+ year old format)
Saje | August 05, 15:21 CET
GVH | August 05, 15:48 CET
bionicvapourdude | August 05, 17:14 CET
GVH | August 05, 17:28 CET