Herc's seen AtS S5x02 'Just Rewards'.
Contains spoilers but after the episode post your reviews.
This for those in the States who like to write about they thought after the episode but don't want to post in a thread which could contain spoilers for subsequent episodes and heck it's a kinda water cooler thread as well.
October 09 2003
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


The cut back to Sunnydale circa...19 days ago...was awesome, it got me back into Spike's head. It reminded me of his death, and his desire to sacrifice himself. It's awesome to see Spike and Angel interact, it shows the extreme difference between the two despite the fact that they both have souls, and that ultimately they both work for the same side.
Spike's lack of interest in redemption was interesting, and that by the end of the episode I think he realized that he didn't atone by a long shot. He doesn't want to go to hell, and he knows that's where he would go despite the sacrifice.
I'm not sure I buy a Fred/Spike hookup that everyone's insinuating. I'm spoiler-free so don't ruin anything, but I think that Spike's commentary was more to get under Angel's skin than anything else. I could very well be wrong...but it just doesn't feel right.
I expected a double-double-cross. But Edlund and Fury pulled it off so well that it kept me heavily entertained throughout.
To recap, I was worried about how they'd bring Spike back. I was worried that they'd ignore his sacrifice. But the realization in Spike that he simply hadn't done enough to go "where heroes go" and that he needs to more in order to atone makes a lot of very cool sense.
This episode scratched an itch I've had since May.
ringworm | October 09, 06:37 CET
vfannel | October 09, 16:40 CET
Cris | October 09, 17:00 CET
About Angel and Smallville: Although I have enjoyed each series' first two episodes, I must say that although Smallville had the better two, the plotlines set up by Angel have far greater possible breadth and depth. Smallville seems to have painted itself into a familiar hole with the unconsummated love affair between Clark and Lana, while abandoning what should have been a promising story line of Pete, the best friend who knows Superman's secret. The continuing moral decay of Lex Luthor, however, should be fascinating to watch.
Conversely, although neither of the first two Angel episodes deserve mention as all-time favorites in quality or exposition, the stage is now set for any number of directions, both within the current cast and the now under-employed do-gooders from Sunnydale. The brother finally has something to do beside act tough, fight and get knocked the bleep out. Angel has the perfect foil in Spike. And, there is the likelihood that the triumvirate of Fred, Wesley and Lorne will each have stand-out, stand-alone episodes within the current tapestry.
[ edited by brother_grady on 2003-10-09 15:05 ]
brother_grady | October 09, 17:04 CET
Why is Spike the way he is now? What's going on, and will he use Fred's scientific interest in him for his own means (and the fact that there is a draw between Fred and Angel and he could come between could be *bonus* in his mind), or will some kind of 'friendship' develop between he and Fred?
He's straddling a chasm? Over hell? Why? Hmmmmmm----interesting things you do to us, Joss.
Ok, I'm a total BtVS geek, but it felt like home to see the words 'Sunnydale' on the screen, no matter how brief.
BTW, the 'Necromancer' character, isn't he the voice from Disney's Haunted Mansion? Guess I should do an imdb check, hmmm?
*~back from computer crashed pergatory, my own personal chasm~*
The Lady Pele | October 09, 17:24 CET
Yes, it was a Spike heavy episode but that was necessary to pave his way into the series. Also the episode did a good job in contrasting Angel and Spike.
Personally I saw no sign for a possible love interest between Spike and Fred. I agree with Ringworm that it was simply a ploy by Spike to get under Angel's skin. And Fred's reply in the lab, i.e. "lukewarm" is a good description of the sextual tension between them.
beans | October 09, 18:28 CET
Just a thought.
fraying | October 09, 19:49 CET
vpecoraro | October 09, 20:04 CET
MindPieces | October 09, 20:43 CET
prufrock | October 09, 21:05 CET
I must say the 19 days ago part really brought back memories and i felt like i was at home again, watching buffy on tuesday night...
And about the Fred/Spike thing??? No, I just don't see that working, but Joss can do a lot of interesting things.. we'll see
buffyfanatic18 | October 09, 21:14 CET
(edited to add ... haven't noticed any difference between workprint and final.)
Caroline | October 09, 21:21 CET
The Sunnydale flashback was great (like others have mentioned it did have a very warm “home” feeling) and it’s good to have a reference as to just how long the gang has been at W&H. It was strange to see a Buffy clip with that little WB logo in the corner again. I do agree that the looping as distracting at times and I don’t know if it was just me but I swear that some of the dead bodies in the showroom didn’t stand completely still in the background of some shots.
Karen | October 09, 22:54 CET
(I had the same problem (less egregiously) when ME inserted Dawn into the continuity in S5... I always thought it would be fun to throw in some false flashbacks to how the showdowns with Big Bads from seasons 1-4 must have gone differently once the monks photoshop Dawn into the picture.)
Other than that nagging at me, I'm enjoying the new season. There are lots of places they can go with this and they all look exciting. I just wish they hadn't made hash of so much of what's gone before-- part of what I like about the ME shows is that they operate on a principle that events have consequences.
jbushnell | October 10, 01:38 CET
Sad that our heroes can't ever, y'know, get grunty.
fraying | October 10, 02:42 CET
The Lady Pele | October 10, 02:52 CET
And the flashback to the Battle at Helm's--I mean at the Hellmouth was a very welcome surprise, especially since they mercifully cut the awkward "I love you -- no you don't" part.
Spike as a ghost is intriguing, though his disappeaaring act can get a bit old -- unless they start to show where he goes when he does dissappear...a la Frodo when he puts on the One Ring.
And Gunn: I wonder when the next time he'll beat someone(thing) down(with his fists, not his newly implanted law degree), doesn't look like it's gonna happen as often as usual..but it's cool that he has a new focus.
Harmony is kinda growing on me, her cluelessness is refreshing.."I cracked up to her "preaching to the horse's mouth" line.
Also got a good chuckle out of the "WB's Tarzan" ad appearing right as the Necromancer was making a play on words about said vine-swinger.
All and all, I'm stoked over the new season!
protector | October 10, 02:58 CET
vpecoraro | October 10, 04:57 CET
Ahem.
fraying | October 10, 07:13 CET
The idea of Spike potentially going to hell is sort of interesting, if you really want to get obsessive about it, and here's why:
The standard line on Jossverse vampires is that, when you get bitten, your soul (whatever that may be) leaves and is replaced by a demon -- therefore the vampire version of "you" is not actually "you" at all, it just sort of thinks it's "you" (whatever that means).
So, the geeky and basically very sweet and decent William the Bloody Awful Poet becomes simply William the Bloody -- a guy who still loves his mum but doesn't mind murdering lots of people and is a lot cooler besides (even if he won't get that leather jacket for a few centuries).
The theory goes that Vampire Spike and un-Vamp William are in reality two different people. So, once the soul returns, is it really fair to hold the William-soulliable for the acts of Spike (during which time William was supposedly away, presumably in heaven or limbo, though besouled Spike certainly seems to have no such memory) by sending him to hell.
Would that be fair?
Of course, it's possible that Jossverse isn't fair and punishes the besouled for the acts they committed while unsouled. Of course, there are only two besouled vampires, so the whole thing is a bit of an anomoly, I guess.
Follow me? Well, I barely do myself....
bobster | October 10, 07:50 CET
Frees died some time ago, but I don't have any good necromancy jokes on hand.
bobster | October 10, 07:57 CET
[ edited by Simpleba on 2003-10-10 07:12 ]
Simpleba | October 10, 09:08 CET
Coll | October 10, 16:06 CET
Weekly | October 10, 16:35 CET
Someone on another board noticed a curious thing about 'Just Rewards'. The idea of a necromancer who can control vampires because they're dead was a plot line in the 'Spike and Dru' comic book. This was written by Chris Golden and also a certain Mr Marsters.
What are the odds James put this idea to Joss?
Simon | October 10, 19:15 CET
However, at least in feature film production (TV may be a bit different because of the time factor), some looping is required on almost all productions and many actions films are probably 70% looped or more. Often, entire scenes are looped and no one notices. So there is probably some unusual situation for Marsters/Spike to sound so different from the usual.
bobster | October 10, 23:19 CET