September 30
2009
(SPOILER)
Angel #28 two page preview.
Beautiful art, bodes very well! Spoilers for characters featured in the arc.
angeliclestat
| AtS
| 16:39 CET
|
18 comments total
| tags: comic, idw, crown prince syndrome, denham, willingham, angel
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Last Angel in Hell fan-vid contest.
|
Dollhouse wardrobe designer Alana ...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
[ edited by Buffyfantic on 2009-09-30 16:44 ]
Buffyfantic | September 30, 16:45 CET
Aren't the likenesses perfect? I loved Denhams work on the X-Files comic, so I knew he would do a good job. Cant wait to see his Angel.
Glad to see the gang are back together. Based on the inclusion of James and Dez I am interested to see how how much of the "PTB gone bad" aspect of Aftermath will be expanded upon in future.
angeliclestat | September 30, 16:49 CET
Yes,the artwork is great.You can tell who everyone is.Very clean and detailed.
Well,Kelley Armstrong's Angel:Aftermath arc was so maligned that I wonder how many are going to be happy that this arc could play into what Willingham does in any way.The general reaction I've seen is people want to have anything relating to Angel:Aftermath to be ignored and never spoken of or heard from again in the Angel comics.So I wonder if this will automatically turn people off to picking up Angel starting with #28 and Willingham's run if they have to deal with anything carried over from Aftermath.It might be a turnoff.
Personally,I had certain problems with Armstrong's run.I hated the gratuitous Cordy appearence with a firey passion.But it had some good ideas such as the PTB gone bad idea as you mention.I think the character Dez has potential to be interesting while I didn't care for James or the idea of introducing actual angels into the Buffyverse.I also liked really having Kate back.
So I'm glad Aftermath won't be ignored since it did have some interesting concepts that could hopfully be handled better in the new creative team's hand.Assuming there are actually going to be a part of this run.I wondering if the second page isn't just sort of a re-cap kind of thing from Angel or another character of ATF and Aftermath for new readers.
[ edited by Buffyfantic on 2009-09-30 17:37 ]
Buffyfantic | September 30, 17:15 CET
Also, if IDW did pretend it never happened, I'd feel screwed over. "Hey look, we know you spend € xx on our comics, but they were rubbish, so... please throw them out and give us more of your money?"
Allycat | September 30, 17:23 CET
wenxina | September 30, 17:46 CET
Not to say,I want bad artwork.But I'm easier to please with art vs. the writing.
[ edited by Buffyfantic on 2009-09-30 17:56 ]
Buffyfantic | September 30, 17:51 CET
Unlike Aftermath.....nothing could help that art:) The characters look perfectly like their respective actors in this, so colour me happy!
angeliclestat | September 30, 17:57 CET
Emmie | September 30, 18:17 CET
angeliclestat | September 30, 18:19 CET
I'm pretty excited to have Willingham on the Angel comics. His Fables are one of my all time favorite series.
Changeling | September 30, 18:29 CET
wenxina | September 30, 18:32 CET
Vergil | September 30, 18:46 CET
angeliclestat | September 30, 18:55 CET
wenxina | September 30, 19:50 CET
angeliclestat | September 30, 20:31 CET
Don't bet on it. They're in different frames; that could easily be a "where are they now?" recap sort of panel. After all, we know Connor's Quortoth stay is history, why shouldn't the other panel be, too?
jclemens | September 30, 22:52 CET
Love the art. And I'm actually kind of glad they didn't erase Aftermath (which was 99% a failure of the ghastly art). I think this new artist might quickly become my favorite after Mooney (who is so far the best inside artist for either Buffy or Angel). And it's a toss up between Jo Chen and Alex Garner.
NileQT87 | October 01, 05:53 CET
CowboyCliche | October 01, 09:32 CET