Steve DeKnight on 'Hellbound'.
The writer and director of last night's episode wanted you to either love or hate it. So which camp do you belong to? Post your reviews and let us know what you thought of the Spike episode.
A quick glance at the usual places and most people seem to have really enjoyed it.
October 23 2003
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


Now, concerning the episode...
Some really good dialogue. Spike's dialogue continues to be sharp and witty but laden with English slang that still makes me wince at times...He doesn't ALWAYS have to say love when speaking to a girl, okay?
I am really looking forward to the middle of the seasonand ... By then, ME will be able to focus back on the core group (or what is left of them). I've been watching season 2 repeatedly over the last couple of weeks and I can truly say that I miss the group dynamic that Angel, Cordy, Wes, and Gunn displayed in the first couple of seasons...I feel that much of that has been lost in the last two seasons and especially through the first four episodes of season five.
Simpleba | October 23, 12:20 CET
I started doing other stuff about halfway through - found it slow and rather tedious and not at all scary. Looking forward to an episode that's more about Angel. Or Wesley. Or Lorne.
Caroline | October 23, 13:07 CET
Oh and since Big Sis is off the air, "Buffy" ,it seems, is no longer a 4-letter (err 5-letter) word, as this episode demonstrates..as well as the new Buffy/Angel block on WB Sunday.
protector | October 23, 16:14 CET
thatcanadiangirl | October 23, 16:26 CET
lisi | October 23, 16:53 CET
However, I loved that Fred is NOT falling for Spike or vice-versa, their friendship is good, sacrificing yourself to save the world because of your love for someone then having another crush 30 days later is just flipping WRONG!
And Fred's response to Wesley's "on one condition - dinner" statement. Priceless. I could feel Wesley's heart break a little more before he covered and told her to eat something. Clearly, she's not going to just move from Gunn to Wes easily. If at all.
I'm also not one with the idea that either Spike or Angel will "go to hell". The soul that goes to another place after death was not in the bodies of these two when they did the things that would send them there, so why would they burn? Besides, it's not "hell" in the Buffyverse, it's a "hell dimension".
Cris | October 23, 16:59 CET
The most shocking thing for me was not the violence, but that Angel believes he's going back to hell.
Elo | October 23, 17:07 CET
gingeriffic | October 23, 17:18 CET
thatcanadiangirl | October 23, 17:24 CET
[ edited by tkent on 2003-10-23 15:40 ]
Grace | October 23, 17:39 CET
weds | October 23, 17:43 CET
I thought that girl spook with the stump arms was very scary. And I loved the little discussion between Spike and Angel. I think James Marsters is doing great with the "scared Spike" theme, and even though I know he won't be a ghost for long, I think he's doing a really good job with the limitations so far.
And hey, didja notice? They dimmed the lights!!
Willowy | October 23, 18:02 CET
a Wes-centric ep after that.
At any rate, I found much to love with 5.4: The S/A conversation on the couch ("You like Barry Mannilow" Hee!); Fred brushing off Spike's charms and "dishiness," and yet finding him worthy of being saved; Gunn and the panther; some nice spooky bits (finger chopping! *twitch* ).
Good stuff. :)
Joss' bitch | October 23, 19:05 CET
My biggest reservations are also about the Spike/Angel going to hell thing. My reservations are not that they would think so, that's a character thing. I just hope the writers aren't trying to say that they think those two really would go to hell. I'm not sure where they would go, but I don't buy the idea that they can't be fully redeemed for, like has been mentioned by some of you above, things that they didn't even really do. Even if it had really been them...
(For that matter, I also believe that once you're forgiven for something you're forgiven, that's that, done deal. Which means I have issues with the whole premise of Angel. But that's another discussion that I don't want to go into any further right now ;))
But it's not totally clear to me whether that is what the writers are trying to say. That portal that was trying to suck Spike in? Well, it was the 'Reaper' guy who calls it hell, maybe it really is just a portal to a hell dimension, like Connor went through to get to Quartoth.
Also found Angel's belief that he's going to go to hell anyway quite a surprise. The revelation came in the same conversation where Spike brought up the Shanshu prophecy to Angel, and Angel dismissed the prophecy as bull. The realization that there is another vampire with a soul, and that the prophecy may not be meant for Angel after all, has almost certainly bummed Angel out. He's had that belief in his upcoming humanity for about 3 years or more. It's the one thing he's always looked forward to, and he always saw it as his redemption. Maybe that's why, now that that future is uncertain, Angel sees hell in it. Maybe Angel equated the idea of becoming human with the idea of being forgiven at last, it was his idea of being worth heaven.
Just a little bit more to add, and then I promise I'll stop. :)
I too, loved the last scene with Spike and Fred, but I'd like to add that I loved all of their interaction in this episode. It's nice to see somebody besides Buffy actually caring about Spike, and he was clearly moved when she said he was "worth saving."
I also liked the part where Spike asked Fred for a hug. Cute. :P
forcorreo | October 23, 19:15 CET
And the pacing was bizarre-it dragged and dragged for the first half hour, plodded, really, with a few jolts of life, then hit a good stride around the midpoint and for the most part, delivered a solid second half.
Though Pavayne was great (where have I seen that actor before?! It's bugging me!) and the premise re him staying out of hell was wonderful and he was creepy and what they finally did to him was truly creepy/chilling.
I think moving spike along to the point where is he now re his corporeality is a good thing - it's a good device for use in future eps.
I though the interaction between Fred and Spike was very good as well-those two have some decent chemistry . Not necessarily sexual but chemistry nonetheless.
the rest is the meh. just how much are we going to get of angel vs. spike nyahhh nyaah nyahh for the rest of the season? It's a one-note routine. Let them try to kill each other or let them come to a new understanding/respect but please no more of the "what, are you 12?-worthy" sniping back and forth. I cringe at the idea of this dragging on till sweeps...
jeebs | October 23, 19:16 CET
I'm thankful all us hetero males only had to see a bit of James Marsters thigh and not his butt cheeks. More of Amy Acker and less steam would have been nice.
The dialogue was near perfect, I agree the british slang was a bit heavy. I liked the scene with Spike and Angel where they use each others christian names. More back story between those two would be great.
I want to address this idea of damnation and forgiveness. Fundamentalists say that if someone like Adolph Hitler apologized to god before he died he would go to heaven but since the Buddha didn't "know Christ" he's burning in hell. I don't want Angel to get too deep into theology(especially of the christian kind) but I like to think of it this way: If someone raped and murdered your sister but then spent the next 20 years washing the sores of lepers should he still burn in hell? This is what Angel and Spike were talking about.
vpecoraro | October 23, 19:47 CET
But we loved Spike and Angel as The Bickersons...hysterical...
Chris in Virginia | October 23, 20:07 CET
The scene with Spike and Angel 'hanging' was excellent, and a necessary light moment to an otherwise dark episode.
Also (spoilers maybe) Spike was finally introduced to the shanshu prophesy.
Still pissed about the advertising, "contains partial nudity" played over Fred in the shower, and all we bloody got was Spike. After season six of Buffy the warning should be "spike wears clothes"
Ghost Spike | October 23, 20:15 CET
Angel has a great loneliness this season. Without Connor, he seems cut loose from everything that could matter to him. Was shocked to hear him say he doesn't believe in the prophecy anymore but if I had lived through his last two year, I don't hink I would either.
Unitas | October 23, 20:17 CET
lala | October 23, 20:44 CET
todd | October 23, 20:45 CET
ringworm | October 23, 20:47 CET
todd | October 23, 21:02 CET
Linda | October 23, 21:09 CET
One, as Linda said, no Spike, no season 5.
Two, if he weren't going to crossover, I don't think he would have died in Buffy, his death, while on the one hand a noble one (spike thought it WAS the end), was also a device to get him to Los Angeles.
Ghost Spike | October 23, 21:16 CET
Karen | October 23, 21:37 CET
vpecoraro | October 23, 22:50 CET
LB | October 23, 23:52 CET
After the .. darn whats the name.. the girl who was trying to contact Spike but got the other guy instead? Anyway, after that.. everyone thinking it was Spike, irritated me. But then Wes mentioned his theory that it wasn't Spike and I shouted at the tv ("thank gawd someone has a brain") of course other than Fred. It was just peevy that Fred was the only one believing in Spike. They guy saved the whole world, how many times will they have to say that so Angel gets it eh?
Two last points.. 1) I too enjoyed knowing that Angel liked Spike's poetry, that was a nice touch.
2) What was Wes doing when Fred came in with her list? Was he looking at something in his desk? Hmmmmmm. ;)
jenguin | October 24, 00:06 CET
I appreciated the attempt at getting into the mythology of Wolfram and Hart - it's something that ME has always excelled at but for some reason failed to pursue for AtS. I guess the characters already had their own back stories to be developed. Even a mythology for the PtB or Shanshu would've been nice, but instead they were relegated to being plot devices.
Orangeinmymouth | October 24, 00:40 CET
Meanwhile Angel descends even further into the moral quagmire..
And if Mutant Enemy had more a budget, we'd seen the relevant flashbacks instead of the couch scene (amusing as it was).
Simon | October 24, 02:23 CET
Coll | October 24, 02:44 CET
If I wanted to watch a show about Spike having a soooouuuul(FRed, say that one more time, and I'm gonna rip out your tongue), I can tune into FX and watch Buffy season 6 and 7. Matter-a-fact, If I wanted to see James Marsters nekkid for the umphteenth time, hey... I can tune into FX. Right about now, the OC is looking very much entertaining
nychick | October 24, 05:38 CET
Ami | October 24, 06:29 CET
Anyhow, I was in the "meh" to "pretty good" camp. I'm a bit squeamish, so the glass in the eye and the finger chopping scene was good practice for "Kill Bill" (why is it so much worse to see a character do it to himself than to see someone else do it?)...btw, I think the sound effects was actually lettuce being sliced. Or maybe an onion. Otherwise, it suffered slightly from the neccessary slow-pace of a horror film without being super-duper scary, but otherwise was a decent, but not great, episode. Still, they get credit for trying something a bit differnt
Re: the whole soul business. Here I thought I was the only one who was bugged by this, but several people mentioned it here and Peter David has a problem with it, too.
My suspicion/hope is that the point here may be that that the Buffyverse -- which is decidely not a strictly Judeo-Christian one (one of the reasons the Christian fundamentalist right so despises these shows) -- is intended to be inherently unfair in some respects; perhaps a reflection of the Christian fundie belief that, say, all Jews, Muslims and even more so Hindus, Buddhists and especially pagans, etc., no matter how kind and virtuous are going to Hell which I find frankly deeply repulsive, evil actually. But what if it were, nevertheless, true? It's a fascinating idea that's been played with before (the movie, "The Rapture" comes to mind). We'll see what develops.
The ending, while again, more or less completely justified, may also be a continuation of the further "beiging" of Angel this year. In any case, there seems to be a trend developing where, at the end of every episode, Angel does something just a little bit extra hard or vengeful or even unneccessary. It's something to keep watching for.
bobster | October 24, 06:32 CET
Still thought it dragged a bit, and I agree with the poster that talked about Spike's dialogue. Really, give him a wider vocab, please - dropping in words like blighter and bloody every other minute isn't going to make him sound British. And the whole 'Just wanted to... 's all' thing? Getting a bit old. I think I could get back into Spike if he were just... Spike. (And if he held back on the scenery chomping just a little) They way they used to write him. You know, like a real character. I don't know, was that ALL Whedon's influence on the earlier seasons?
If they're not going to give Tony Head a role, perhaps they can bring him in as British dialogue advisor. Or hey, just ask Denisof, he seems to have a handle on it what with having lived in England for 15 years.
That shot of Fred's behind and legs in the almost see through dress early on in the show was more disturbing than the glass-in-eye woman.
But hey, I really did like the medium.
Caroline | October 24, 11:57 CET
I found the spooks to be very creepy but then I scare easily and am not a big horror fan. Hush totally freaked me out! Anyway, I thought the episode was great and I have to agree with the chemistry comment between Fred and Spike. But please! keep it platonic! :)
lyn | October 25, 17:28 CET
i hope that the writers don't screw up the portrayel of the group's decaying dynamics like last year's BtVS S7, in which the character interaction sucked beyond my tolarence. i mean i hope wes doesn't become "invisible" giles...etc. and gunn better stop blurting out legal info out of the blue, it just seems fake and forced! however, i really admire fred's growth into the assertive memeber of the group, who actually still remembers why the gang got into all of this in the first place.
also, the fang gang better be cautious, w&h is not as powerful/secure as it was portrayed to be, the sweeps didn't detect the ghosts's presence, which i find very strange given all the resources/shamans/mystics in the bldg.
did anyone else notice the references (intentional?) to that movie marsters appeared in for like 5 min, house on haunted hill or whatever, w/ geoffery rush? i ABOHRED that movie, but the quick shots of spike with the blood and pavayne's confinment "chamber" are too reminicient of the movie, but worked nicely.
rsfayez | October 26, 02:41 CET