January 13 2010
(SPOILER)
Amy Acker spills some beans about the next Dollhouse episode.
Does exactly what it says on the tin. Er, headline. More at The TV Addict.
This thread has been closed for new comments.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.
Anuris | January 13, 11:14 CET
VaughnOfTheDead | January 13, 11:18 CET
It's a bummer if Amy really is only in one more episode, I'm really looking forwards to see what is going to happen.
Donnie | January 13, 11:39 CET
flugufrelsarinn | January 13, 12:01 CET
If y'all promise to keep whatever you find in this thread, anyone interested in knowing where to look for the clue? Or do you just want to wait a whole 2 days to see the episode? |-)~
Supposedly it's a big thing, so unless you're just that bored and like a good hunt, you may not want to go looking! S'why I haven't.
Gossi, I already told you where to look, huh?
[ edited by bobw1o on 2010-01-13 21:48 ]
bobw1o | January 13, 12:47 CET
So, it's Amy, but not necessarily Claire? Hmmm... maybe it's her original personality? Or perhaps she's become a composite like Echo & Alpha? Come to think of it, she did a pretty good job shooting someone in the head who supposedly has *no* background in firearms. My guess is Ultra-Whiskey. Why? Maybe because she's still harping on the #1 stuff. Which would make me think that she hasn't been "Claire" for some time.
What do you guys think?
bobw1o, I want to know where to look! Can you link the .ORG where you describe this "where"??
korkster | January 13, 12:55 CET
I like Korster's comment - maybe Claire's original self is the original co-head of Rossum (so either Boyd or Clyde are out, or are copies of her?). I still think she may be related to Topher somehow, so either she was so distressed by what she was doing that she had Topher wipe her, or the partner had her wiped. If Topher's comment is relevant, does that mean Adelle is really much higher up on the ladder than we think? Note that Caroline wants to kill Adelle in Epitaph 1. What changes with respect to Adelle, and does it relate to Claire? Could Adelle even be the true co-head? My head spins with questions!
eyes of the world | January 13, 13:21 CET
I believe the explanation to Claire's skill with the gun would be encompassed within the "sleeper" programing.
And I'd imagine that Claire/Whiskey is a bit to young to have been an original part of Rossum, as the whole programmable/copying people project started in the 80s. This isn't to say she isn't a higher up. Then again, could've been a kid genius!
bobw1o | January 13, 13:28 CET
gossi | January 13, 14:33 CET
Well, I think, that by that he simply meant that she has suffered enough pain (emotional as well as physical) due to Dollhouse and was useful for it – whether as a doctor or the number one doll – for long enough time, so that she deserves to get her freedom, if she chooses to, which she didn't, because she was affraid to lose her Saunders personality.
Anuris | January 13, 14:58 CET
Sunfire | January 13, 15:20 CET
Tell ya what, I'm gonna look for it. If I find it too easily, I'll wait till the episode discussion thread. If I don't find it or it's very difficult I'll give up to 24 hrs notice, which is to say US Pacific coast time, so less than 24 hours for many.
How easy is too easy to post? I guess I'll have to decide, but I feel like even if it takes me till the time it airs that would have been too easy once a bunch of people are looking for it.
And yeah, if I post it, it'll be over at .org, thanks Sunfire.
Gossi, everything else I knew (not much) got out by other means anyway, but since I don't actually know what this is, you're right, I should at least know what I'm doing before I do it!
bobw1o | January 13, 15:36 CET
I wonder about that "maybe you're really Caroline" reveal. Did she just throw that out as a random example off the top of her head or at what stage did this really happen? It's an arbitrary twist that I'd love since we'd get to see more of her but once they shot the pilot I couldn't even come up with a way that might make any sense.
I like those theories that the former her once did know Topher though.
orangewaxlion | January 13, 22:42 CET
Maybe as we wait, could you just list what has already gotten out there (and has already been discussed on Whedonesque)? While we pass the time. ;)
korkster | January 14, 07:46 CET
As for what's already gotten out, like I said, I didn't know much: I knew that we'd see Victor back in fatigues, though I didn't know the context, so I thought it was more of his history as opposed to his mind, which, arguably...
I also saw a picture in the wardrobe trailer of a particular actor in post-apocalyptic clothing and Shawna swore me to secrecy about (which she also tried to do when I saw Alexis Denisov on set, until I told her I was expecting him to be there cause the internets already knew). Not but 2 days later that spoiler made it here via Ausiello I believe. No one here seemed surprised, everyone seemed to have expected it.
There was one more thing I think, but now I can't remember what it was. And no, I had no idea about last week's huge reveal.
But, has everyone figured out by now where the blood on Fran's face came from in the photos from cake-delivery day? ;-)
bobw1o | January 14, 11:01 CET
gossi | January 14, 11:24 CET
[ edited by eyes of the world on 2010-01-14 21:59 ]
eyes of the world | January 14, 12:56 CET
korkster | January 14, 19:04 CET
Although bobw10's clue is in Getting Closer, is it not? Maybe I should just go and rewatch that...
curlymynci | January 14, 21:58 CET
korkster | January 15, 14:59 CET