"That's one spunky little girl you've raised. I'm gonna eat her."
January 29
2010
Eliza Dushku on Dollhouse and its demise.
She talks to the LA Times about the cancellation, her role as producer, the Echo/Caroline dynamic and the Friday night death slot.
Simon
| Dollhouse
| 06:23 CET
|
18 comments total
| tags: eliza dushku, dollhouse
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Neil Patrick Harris to host adapta...
|
Nets Salivating Over Actors from C...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
Pointy | January 29, 06:48 CET
And yeah, it's too bad the show won't continue to exist in some medium. But it is rare that a canceled show like this gets to tie up (most) of its loose ends so I'm grateful for that. Imagine if we had never gotten a second season!
nuccbko | January 29, 07:45 CET
And now she's blaming it.
I guess I'd like to hear her unedited comments as well. We probably won't ever hear that, though.
VeryVeryCrowded | January 29, 07:58 CET
nuccbko | January 29, 08:11 CET
than the Network. I sorta doubt that she has any serious issues
with the Studio.
JDL | January 29, 08:32 CET
[ edited by gossi on 2010-01-29 14:37 ]
gossi | January 29, 08:33 CET
zee | January 29, 13:13 CET
I know its been said before, but its great that Eliza is echoing other peoples views. The show got a second season against the odds. And it did great things with it. Things that no other show would have done, went places that no other show would have gone. And I say that on UK time. I'm only on Episode 7.
I'm well aware she need to maintain face, but she also knows how this industry works. Getting a second season with those numbers was so incredibly against the odds, its understandable why she's grateful.
She's a very lucky woman, and that was, despite numerous mistakes along the way, a very lucky, and very brilliant show.
Apocalypse | January 29, 14:35 CET
As for why Dollhouse failed to grab the numbers, I think it was just hard for people to connect to. It was a great show, with superb stories and believable acting, but all the characters seemed like various shades of villain. I didn't mind that, but people like my wife didn't care for it. She wanted a character to root for. Echo's "rootability" came late in the game for her.
quantumac | January 29, 16:19 CET
[ edited by The One True b!X on 2010-01-29 16:24 ]
The One True b!X | January 29, 16:24 CET
Star Wars has clearly defined characters. I mean, the bad guy literally wears a black hat. In Phantom Menace, there's a bunch of characters without, uhm, character. Nobody to follow. So it kinda falls apart.
I think season two totally fixed that angle of things. I really loved the second season.
gossi | January 29, 16:36 CET
Why did she need to be defined as a person from day one in order for people to be on her side?
Exactly. It was always clear that she was going to become more self-aware, seems a lot of people just have very little patience with genuine character development (and a purer, more complete example than Echo you'd be hard pressed to find IMO). Even on here where most of us are fans of Joss or Eliza or both there were complaints about the arc and the character relatability after episode two. Yep, episode two.
Saje | January 29, 17:15 CET
And I was rooting for Echo to become self aware.
JAYROCK | January 29, 17:37 CET
Kris | January 29, 20:56 CET
didifallasleep | January 29, 21:10 CET
edcsLover9 | January 29, 21:46 CET
JAYROCK | January 30, 04:01 CET
I don't understand that either.
electricspacegirl | January 30, 08:22 CET