July 13 2010
(SPOILER)
The Cabin in the Woods is a "cult-builder".
Chud's Devin Faraci recalls his visit to the movie's post-production office and says "everything I saw that day was kind of great and pointed to a movie that could exceed its low budget boundaries". And like the rest of us, he wonders if the movie will ever see the light of day. Spoilers for the movie's premise and the very cool t-shirt.
You need to log in to be able to post comments.
About membership.


gossi | July 13, 18:50 CET
BlueSkies | July 13, 19:06 CET
UnpluggedCrazy | July 13, 19:14 CET
Waterkeeper511 | July 13, 19:36 CET
The Do That Girl | July 13, 19:46 CET
Nicole | July 13, 19:54 CET
KaileeA42 | July 13, 19:59 CET
redders | July 13, 20:08 CET
I want this movie to come out. And I want this tee shirt post haste, I do, I do.
Seriousfully - they could have sold them at ComicCon and made some bucks, which couldn't hurt, and made some buzz happen, which couldn't hurt even more, but as Devin suggests, this is not that better world. : <
I'm sure the rights to that art are all complicated and hurty - but maybe whoever does own it could get it made/sold on one of those tee-shirt sites? *forlorn hope*
'Cause goddamnit. This movie wants to be seen. This sucks raucously & vociferously out loud.
ETF: stuff
[ edited by QuoterGal on 2010-07-13 23:56 ]
QuoterGal | July 13, 23:46 CET
The One True b!X | July 14, 01:06 CET
Just think, if CitW came out in February, we'd all be enjoying a panel at Comic-Con with Joss, going to a special screening with out shirts on, and maybe even getting teased that there's another in the works.
This really sucks.
korkster | July 14, 01:17 CET
I'm sure it would be cheaper to promote and just release the 2D version. But apparently the studio no longer has the price of popcorn and a coke.
Bummed, Joss and Drew deserve better. And we deserve a movie .... and definitely t-shirts.
Shey | July 14, 08:31 CET
ZodKneelsFirst | July 14, 08:35 CET
sumogrip | July 14, 12:06 CET
Hmm, wasn't Cabin reputed to have a budget of about $30 million ? Cos that's not really that low budget full stop and it's certainly not that low budget for a horror movie (in fact one of my early worries was about the size of the budget re: profitability). Or did that figure turn out to be total flannel ?
And yep, the film must be seen. New law.
Saje | July 14, 14:04 CET
BlueSkies | July 14, 14:19 CET
Hmm, wasn't Cabin reputed to have a budget of about $30 million ?
Yes but this is the Internet so it's convenient to ignore facts.
Depends - the remake of Nightmare on Elm Street was $35 million, the Friday the 13th remake was $19 million and Drag Me To Hell was $30 million. On the other hand, Shaun of the Dead was only £4 million to make.
Simon | July 14, 14:48 CET
(And it wasn't converted to 3D). The reality is MGM had to get a $40m credit from the people they owe money to, to release Hot Tub Time Machine. I strongly suspect the reason it got knocked back a year was because MGM knew they wouldn't be able to get the financing to release both Hot Tub and Cabin. Hot Tub under performed, the rest is history.
[ edited by gossi on 2010-07-14 15:19 ]
gossi | July 14, 15:17 CET
However you slice it though, $30 million is a very decent budget for a horror movie, definitely near the top end of the range.
Saje | July 14, 15:27 CET
Thanks for bringing the smiles, Jobo. :)
$30 million isn't chump change for sure. Does anyone know how much Cloverfield was?
korkster | July 14, 16:37 CET
Shapenew | July 14, 17:14 CET
Saje | July 14, 18:58 CET
BlueSkies | July 14, 19:13 CET
Cabin's budget towards the higher end of the scale for a horror movie, for sure - but it's a horror movie at the higher end of scale on every sense (i.e. Joss Whedon, Drew Goddard, the pure scale of the movie and the effects required). This is a big movie.
gossi | July 14, 19:25 CET
IrrationaliTV | July 14, 19:30 CET
The One True b!X | July 14, 19:49 CET
IrrationaliTV | July 14, 19:53 CET
The One True b!X | July 14, 20:01 CET