November 03
2010
(SPOILER)
Discuss 'Serenity: The Shepherd's Tale'.
The Whedonverse's most intriguing mystery gets resolved courtesy of Zack Whedon and Chris Samnee.
Simon
| Firefly&Serenity
| 15:35 CET
|
28 comments total
| tags: chris samnee, serenity: the shepherd's tale, zack whedon
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Promo photos of Summer Glau on the...
|
(SPOILER)
For the discussion of Buffy #38.
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
hacksaway | November 03, 16:17 CET
Simon | November 03, 16:32 CET
zeitgeist | November 03, 19:48 CET
Simon | November 03, 20:05 CET
.
.
.
.
.
Spoilers
.
.
.
.
.
.
Spoilers
-He was a browncoat undercover agent – apparently abandoned by both sides – or simply did not care for either side anymore
-Had a fake eye that was apparently never removed - it served as a recording bug that supplied the brown coats with intel
-Messed up really bad with his Alliance superiors but it was all covered up by the Alliance themselves otherwise his ident. Card would’ve gotten him no help in “Safe”
Spoilers
.
.
.
.
.
.
Spoilers
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Spoilers
[ edited by JohnAnthony on 2010-11-03 21:16 ]
JohnAnthony | November 03, 21:09 CET
Simon | November 03, 22:34 CET
10th Crew Member | November 03, 22:34 CET
embers | November 03, 22:39 CET
[ edited by 10th Crew Member on 2010-11-03 22:48 ]
10th Crew Member | November 03, 22:46 CET
(Spoilers all through this thread.)
I think the execution was a bit weak for something I've anticipated so long. It was good, but for this, I wanted outstanding. The storytelling did not quite grab me, but it did nudge me. The art isn't my favorite style, but it was well executed for what it was. All in all, it was a 3 out of 5 (average) when this is something so anticipated by me that anything less than a 5 of 5 would feel like a waste.
It explains Henry's tale (Derrial wasn't his real name), but if this is truly the story Joss intended, I can see how it would have been so much more interesting when woven into the rest of the Firefly storyline. I'd have loved to see Book explain to Mal that he was an Alliance officer, but only because he was actually an infiltrator for the browncoats. I wonder what Joss would have done with the camera eye. I wonder if anyone that knew book as Henry would ever have made an appearance.
I found the timing of Book's story interesting. Apparently, he was on Serenity for at least 2 years (and as many as 4 years). That does not seem to gel with the storyline of the Serenity movie. He was in the abbey 6 years before the battle of Serenity (and four years after that before joining Mal & Co.), wandered the lands for 6 years before that, and served in the Alliance for about 8 years prior to that. That means he left the Alliance 12 years before the battle of Serenity - when Mal was presumably in his late teens or early twenties - perhaps just joining the browncoats. Could something Book have done been one of the reason Mal became a Browncoat?
I see where Zack was going with the soup, but I don't think he nailed it. We know it was something Joss came up with from Ron's comments on that cruise. I'd love to see Joss and Ron get together and do that one little scene on film. I have to imagine that that scene is high on the list of the scenes Joss had envisioned that he most wanted to film.
The thing that stands out to me from the way this story was told: Book already completed his journey and found his redemption BEFORE Firefly began. That would have made for an interesting character.
Zack's note at the end hints that the long delay in this project may have been partially his fault. Brave man.
jgsugden | November 04, 00:40 CET
WilliamTheB | November 04, 08:15 CET
I would have preferred the structure to be different. Make it have more of a story than just flashbacks. Something as simple as having Book tell his story to Mal or someone discovering Book's journal after he died or something. Gives the thing itself more of a point than just answering questions.
Kaan | November 04, 16:13 CET
Onlt things that surprised me: just how much he helped the Browncoats, and of course the eye. Was that eye still transmitting all this time during the show? Woudl someone know secrets about the Serenity crew, and maybe blackmail them later?
And remember the canon Whedon trilogy (I think the second trilogy) had a brief page where Book was working on something and a transmission came in saying he had been terminated? He was still working for SOMEbody while onboard Serenity, even after he found his faith and turned his life around. One might say he's still got a grudge somewhere. Maybe even was sent by a Dust Devil(?) that wasn't quite in good standing with Mal, to kill him.
Just some thoughts.
Overall I liked it. Felt it was a little empty at times -- it lacked that Joss touch of deeper filling, and more dialogue, often gowing passed scenes too quickly, all in an attempt just to get the story over with faster.
And as much as Zack praised his artist, those two (or three?) panels with Mal, were hands down THEE WORST characters art in ANY of Whedon's work I have ever seen. Aweful, truly aweful. A re-pressing should feature FIXED art.
tharpdevenport | November 04, 17:46 CET
I also respectfully disagree and say that Zack absolutely nailed the soup thing, and I loved the book. I was surprised by the Browncoat spy thing and by the death of the real Derrial, feeling how those moments would have played out in the show. At times, it felt too short -- I could have read a miniseries where each issue took place further back, personally -- but that is a minor quibble.
My only real regret about this book is that I, like some other commenters have mentioned, would have rathered this within the context of the show, alas. These revelations, metered out in this order, would have made for great development of Book, and of Mal's relationship to both he and the Alliance.
PuppetDoug | November 04, 21:57 CET
The camera eye thing really was disturbing, because that is almost the kind of thing I would expect the Blue Hand guys to learn about, and use. Or would have been if Firefly had been on the air for years. :(
embers | November 04, 22:55 CET
Each part of Book's life depicted is reduced to its essential component, which suits the man Book became. Book's weird sort of Zen Christianity, as it manifested in him in the present day, was very much about each moment being boiled down to its essence. (You could argue that's precisely what the exchange about the water is all about.)
And so as we get glimpses of his life, those glimpses are not belabored, because Book himself no longer belabored these things, or, really, anything. The form in which the story is told reflects the character whose life is being depicted.
[ edited by The One True b!X on 2010-11-05 00:56 ]
The One True b!X | November 05, 00:53 CET
The art wasn't my favorite style, but I didn't have a problem with it. Would we all have liked a longer story? Of course, but what we got is great and definitely alters how future re-watches can be viewed. It informs us enough about Book to change the significance of specific events.
ben_b55 | November 05, 05:09 CET
Simon | November 05, 20:23 CET
Add me to the sad it wasn't able to be shown in the series with the actors but I still enjoyed it muchly.
Now just Inara's secret and we are all wraped up.
theMidnighter | November 06, 03:16 CET
I felt the language was spot on and much better than some of the previous comics. I loved the layers. A man who doesn't care much about anything, being a spy in a cause he does not believe strongly in, and what finally gets him is the deaths of those innocents. Which he caused.
I'm not sure it answers how he was so well versed in all things Alliance, including secret things like the Operative, but I can live with that.
Lioness | November 08, 03:26 CET
I was thinking that it was a bit slow in the beginning and the structure meant that you always knew where each scene was heading, but when we got into the new revelations about Book's life, it was brilliant. It's a great back-story for the character. He's got a lot of blood on his hands to feel guilty over.
NotaViking | November 08, 17:34 CET
I loved the structure; each layer revealing some new and important piece of Book's character/history.
I love how it was really two stories. The story of how Book became the man we have all come to know and love, and the story of his evolving hairstyle (which we also know and love). Except... did anyone else think that Book went from black hair to grey hair just a bit too fast?
I love the mislead at the beginning. Well, I'm not entirely sure if it was INTENDED to be a mislead, but that's how I read it. When the kid at the beginning asked Book how he got to be tangled up with Serenity crew, and Book starts speechifying, I kind of thought he was going to just tell his life story. But no! Sudden death from above!
Giles_314 | November 10, 01:53 CET
Very satisfying backstory.
Interesting that it showed a side of the browncoats that could be a little ruthless and utilitarian as well as loyal and idealistic.
minime | November 11, 07:12 CET
kernel32cz | November 12, 21:54 CET
Anonymous1 | November 15, 02:16 CET
tmvde | November 23, 22:05 CET
http://whedonesque.com/comments/25334
Though it would incredibly early in the morning for your timezone.
Simon | November 23, 22:08 CET
Maybe I'll just have a bowl of soup
and have a revelation of sorts.
tmvde | November 23, 22:20 CET