"The truth? There is no truth. There's just what you believe."
April 27
2012
(SPOILER)
Discuss 'The Avengers' - round two.
It's out now in even more countries.
The previous discussion thread can be found
here.
Simon
| The Avengers
| 19:22 CET
|
91 comments total
| tags: the avengers
You need to
log in to be able to post comments.
About
membership.
« Older
Avengers Assemble has third bigges...
|
Joss Whedon to appear on CBS News ...
Newer »
© 2002 - 2009 - WHEDONesque.com
(
e-mail)
Individual posts are copyright their respective authors
This is a non-profit, unofficial website, not affiliated with Mutant Enemy, Inc., 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers or UPN.
This is it, fellas. This is the comic-book movie. As I've said before, Nolan's batmovies are GREAT movies based on a comic-book character. Avengers just goes beyond that. It recreates a comic-book on the big screen. Everyone brought their A game, particularly Joss. The snark, the drama, the horror, the action. Oh, Zod, the ACTION. I went in there with expectations through the freakin' roof, and, somehow, it delivered more than I expected.
I honestly feel like those people must've felt back in 1980 after The Empire Strikes Back. I need to watch this again, a few times. There goes my paycheck...
superboy13 | April 27, 19:31 CET
gossi | April 27, 19:33 CET
superboy13 | April 27, 19:41 CET
Simon | April 27, 19:41 CET
gossi | April 27, 19:42 CET
superboy13 | April 27, 19:44 CET
Simon | April 27, 19:45 CET
OldSwede | April 27, 19:46 CET
I was a little disappointed by the cinematography the first time, but I managed to look beyond that this time and concentrate more on how Joss used the camera. There are some some exceptional shots in this movie.
I'm also curious to hear what you think of the score. I think Alan Silvestri did a decent job but I was expecting something more epic, more memorable. The main theme is not bad but he could have gone a lot further in my opinion.
It's my only real complaint with the movie, I was so happy with it that I kept smiling afterwards.
I can also tell you that the reception in France is very good. The press is pretty unanimous (which is kind of rare). Even the more serious, old school critics have said some very nice things about Joss and the movie, I was pleasantly surprised.
[ edited by Liam12 on 2012-04-27 19:49 ]
Liam12 | April 27, 19:46 CET
So cute, at my showing, a little boy with HULK hand gloves did little HULK leaps of excitement as he left the cinema. Yeah. I very nearly joined in. Brilliant.
Mr Jossir, achievement most definitely unlocked. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
viewingfigures | April 27, 19:49 CET
azzers | April 27, 19:54 CET
viewingfigures | April 27, 19:58 CET
gossi | April 27, 19:59 CET
superboy13 | April 27, 20:08 CET
Loki remains my absolute favourite character.
okelay | April 27, 20:08 CET
viewingfigures | April 27, 20:09 CET
Dana5140 | April 27, 20:23 CET
Edit - I have more things to say thus:
I think I am going to go see it again which is pretty rare for me. Looking forward to seeing Johansson, RDG and Ruffalo again, who I think were the pretty clear stand outs. Is three too many?
I don't normally enjoy superhero films - I typically want to go to a cinema to cry or feel bad about humanity, but I am pretty excited to be seeing The Avengers again. My audience at the first showing I saw were awful. There was laughter during the death scene, I was not impressed.
[ edited by insistondoubt on 2012-04-27 20:58 ]
insistondoubt | April 27, 20:48 CET
superboy13 | April 27, 21:01 CET
insistondoubt | April 27, 21:29 CET
gossi | April 27, 21:47 CET
azzers | April 27, 22:13 CET
This moment got me confused for a couple of seconds, too; then I remembered about the bet.
Effulgent | April 27, 22:34 CET
ERIC_Cavalier | April 27, 23:15 CET
daylight | April 27, 23:15 CET
daylight | April 27, 23:25 CET
[ edited by Jackal on 2012-04-27 23:52 ]
Jackal | April 27, 23:48 CET
I watched it on thursday and loved it. Hulk was awesome. All the characters were much more likeable than in their own movies. Even Gwyneth Paltrow's part was more likeable this time.
There were a couple of the-whole-theatre-is-laughing-moments.
I wished Natalie Portman made a surprise-cameo, but nevermind.
roadi | April 27, 23:48 CET
I'd place it alongside The Dark Knight and Kick-Ass as one of the best superhero movies of all time. And this is the first one to be this great without trying to separate itself from the comics or deconstruct the genre. There have been some good ones, but this one stands out.
And on top of that, the Hulk works. That's a feat in and of itself. The Hulk is difficult. Usually Banner is interesting and the Hulk is just anticlimactic. Not here. In the Avengers, the Hulk is very satisfying, and also hilarious.
Joss nailed it. As did the cast. I hope they'll all be back for a sequel.
GreatMuppetyOdin | April 28, 00:43 CET
ERIC_Cavalier | April 28, 00:51 CET
I was a little unsure early on. The opening sequence was okay and intro to the various soon-to-be Avengers was a little slow. Then Tony Stark appeared and everything was okay. It just got better and better from there.
The standout has to be Mark Ruffalo's Bruce Banner/Hulk, particular during the final act. Thumping Thor and the "Puny God" scenes were just fantastic, and had the whole cinema in hysterics.
They all got their chance to shine though, particularly Black Widow, which shouldn't of come as a surprise really.
It was certainly the best of the Marval films by a long way, as even the best of them (Captain America and Iron Man) suffered from poor final acts, something that definitely could not be levelled at this. Best comic book film? I'm not so sure.
There were some ideas early on, which I assumed would be followed through with, but came to an abrupt end after the heavy handed Stuttgart sequence. There is also the issue of the alien race having zero explanation. Perhaps they mean something to readers of the comics, but as someone who knows nothing of the source material I was left entirely in the dark. Similarly, the previously mentioned problem of Hulk suddenly being less rampaging in the final act was pretty jarring.
The Cabin in the Woods probably remains my favourite Whedon project of the year, but this was a worthy contender. I still loved it.
Vandelay | April 28, 00:53 CET
kaiuno | April 28, 01:11 CET
One thing that clearly came to mind was how many different elements that did occur commonly from other Whedon projects, were reminiscent during Avengers, and were elements that felt organic to the movie.
The movie was funny, funny at parts, that I would only be funny in Whedon shows.
The scharma (sp??) thing reminded me of when Buffy, Willow and Xander set up a visit to the mall right before the final battle from Chosen, or Fury dealing with the council was just like dealing with the Watcher's Council.
All the pieces fit, and it didn't felt like a crowded movie, and it does set stage for the next phase of Marvel projects.
I was so happy that there was the shady side from what we assumed were the good guys. And Tony Stark is the embodiment of "I aim to misbehave".
I've tweeted a lot about the score of the movie. I haven't changed too much my opinion about Silvestri's score, it was an appropriate score for the movie, it just wasn't very memorable or iconic. However, the Avengers hero theme really grew on me, it does remind me of the theme for the 1st two seasons of Justice League.
During my 2nd watch I was reminded of some of the comments and criticisms that did circulate on the web way before the premiere. I remember reading criticism that the movie wasn't "cinematic" enough. Did we watch the same movie? I'm so glad that Joss never resorted to shaky cams (which is an acceptable way to shoot movies in certain circles), or if there was, it was barely noticeable, and very organically integrated to the rest of the movie. It didn't feel like a tv show being shot for the big screen. I did see a lot of the same angles and types of shots that Joss also used in Serenity, but in no way those felt like something out of the medium.
There were rumors that the movie would be seen through the eyes of Steve Rogers, which I don't think happened that much. Yes, we did see more flashback from him, and we did see the extended version of the Coda scene we had in Captain America, but even when he took charge of the team in the end, it didn't feel forced, or that unbalanced the movie. Actually, Phil Colson, was in my opinion the heart of the movie, I was so distracted by the set up, that when I should've been expecting it, when things went to route of "leaf in the wind", I was caught by surprise during the 1st watch. And when Tony tells Loki, that he also made Phil angry, it made me cry both times.
The Chitauri and their look. I'm aware that the race originates from the Ultimate Universe, more specifically the Ultimate series (which volume??), but considering that I've only read like the 1st 3 issues of the 1st Ultimates volume, I don't think I'm familiar with them. However look-wise, and even from the one who talked, they actually reminded me of Ord and the Breakworld people from Joss' run on Astonishing X-Men. I didn't mind at all that they were mostly blank, we're just going to hit things creatures of the movie, without more set-up than a name. The way potential next threat was set-up during the final scene of the movie, I think that having being mostly a blank race during it, is understandable, with so many other things that were happening on-screen. I don't think that giving them some personality or even goals, would have increased my appreciation towards the movie, I even worry if that would have ended up as something distracting from the rest of the movie. In the end, I just concluded, they were mindless (mostly), because that was part of Thanos' plans for them.
The Alexis Denisof role. I was so surprised to find that name in the credits (we've been aware of Enver's cameo ever since the set photos from NYC shoot were leaked, but Alexis was a new one), but had a hard time figuring his role. I assume (and according to some comments above seems to agree) that he played the talking Chitauri. Wonder if we'll get a chance to confirm that information. I tried paying attention to the pronunciation of that characters during the 2nd watch, but it was impossible to discern whether that was Alexis.
When the end of the Summer comes, this will be THE Comic Book movie, while DKR will probably be the more grounded in reality one.
The zone of plot speculation.
During the discussion scene after SHIELD's Phase 2 plans were uncovered by the Avengers and that discussion started, there was a very curious shot of the scepter by the side, showing how thin it is. Wonder if that's also part of the set up for the very probable sequel they'll be greenlighting really soon, if these ticket sale numbers keep up.
I wonder if the orb thing on the scepter was actually one of the Infinity Gems, more specifically the mind gem. They did imply that it was powered by the Tesserac, but what if that's a throwaway line, that serves more as mis-information. But, if it's one of the gems, wonder if that's the macguffin side of the next few moviews, with each movie introducing another gem, while in the possible confrotation with Thanos during Avengers 2, we'd see them deal the Infinity Gaunlet thing.
Numfar PTB | April 28, 02:16 CET
Also, Hulk being more in control the second time made perfect sense to me. It's already been established that Banner had learned to control his transformations, but it had been a year since he'd Hulked out, and being pushed into it after an argument with the group and a shocking explosion was terrible. He was the enormous green rage monster. The second time, it was his choice. He knew what he was doing.
UnpluggedCrazy | April 28, 03:04 CET
Pretty_Hate_Machine | April 28, 03:16 CET
ETA: http://marvel-movies.wikia.com/wiki/The_Other
[ edited by mossome on 2012-04-28 08:37 ]
mossome | April 28, 04:52 CET
ETA
@unpluggedcrazy I agree with your assessment of the HULK and his control/lack of control of his abilities. Black Widow specifically states that at that point he is being manipulated by Loki.
Also regarding the general point of the Chitauri being faceless, this bothered me not one iota, I never had that problem with the Stormtroopers in Star Wars and I didn't have that concern here either. They were Loki's army, and within the context of the story, that was all the explanation I required.
[ edited by viewingfigures on 2012-04-28 10:57 ]
viewingfigures | April 28, 10:41 CET
You really do have to take your hat off to Joss, to keep that many plates spinning in the one film, with every main character getting their chance to shine and no character coming to dominate the others was a great achievement. Also the fact that the over 2 hour long running time never felt bloated or stretched out is a fantastic thing.
Like nearly everybody else I've talked to, my favourite character was Banner/Hulk. It's the first time that they have gotten the tone of the character right in the films I feel and it helps that he got the best comedy beats. The entire cinema broke out laughing at his confrontation with Loki (and in Ireland that is a rare thing). I'd be really interested in seeing a new Hulk movie, as long as it stars Ruffalo and is written & directed by Joss. I'm not sure if another writing & directing team will get the tone right (they certainly haven't in the past).
If I have one slight quibble withe film it is that Cap never shouts "Avengers Assemble". As I said a very slight quibble.
I do have one question. Are we sure that Agent Coulson is dead? We really just have Fury's word for it (the medical team are still working on him when Fury gives the news) and as we see in the very next scene, Fury is quite capable of lying for effect.
mgmn | April 28, 12:05 CET
And seeing as how Banner/Hulk was the character(s) I cared the least about going in, having Ruffalo's be my favourite characters in the film going back out is ridiculous praise for the guy. Especially considering I loved everyone else, too
Also, complements to Whedon for maintaining the brother-feud aspect of the plot throughout instead of having Thor show up going "Loki's evil, I'll help you take him down" and then never address it again. Grounded the villain very well for me.
mgmn - I interpreted that as them leaving the door open to go either way with it. I think he's dead until they decide in a sequel that he wasn't.
And I wished for that shout too, but oh well - leaves something for the sequel, I suppose.
As for the general conversation Loki's manipulations and the change in Hulk's self-control, I read it as exactly that - Loki wanted to create a situation in which their main weapon was proven a liability and a problem, so that neither Banner himself nor the others would dare to bring the Hulk into the final fight. Stark just managed to prod Banner in the opposite direction so that the ploy failed.
Finally, to balance the gushing, I do have my own peeves, even if none of them take away from the awesomeness that was this film. I get that Cap's vibranium shield can take on Mjolnir, but when Thor hammers with all his strength, I have a hard time buying Cap not breaking a couple of bones beneath it. And I also found it hard to believe no airforce fighters showed up in the final battle. Sure, it was too brief for any ground troops to get there, but a squadron of planes would have really helped me believe the situation a bit more.
By the way of nothing, anyone know if Denishof's "The Other" character was just voice-work or if it was motion capture as well? Doesn't really matter, I suppose, but I suck at telling these kinds of things, and I just wondered.
Loki | April 28, 12:26 CET
I think he should at least stay dead for a while. If they want to bring him back for, do it 4 movies later into the line. The plotting was open enough to allow that.
I think he deserved that heroic death, and there's nothing wrong with him being Wash+Book of the movie.
Numfar PTB | April 28, 12:34 CET
Simon | April 28, 12:38 CET
gossi | April 28, 12:46 CET
Dude Meister | April 28, 12:47 CET
Dude Meister | April 28, 12:49 CET
Loki | April 28, 12:51 CET
But seriously, so much potential for Jossomeness. Why don't they just give him creative control over the entire Marvel franchise already? Scratch that, over all of Hollywood!
Dude Meister | April 28, 12:56 CET
I didn't escape Asgard, but my cell has pretty decent wi-fi.
Loki | April 28, 13:00 CET
Loved the Stan Lee cameo that appeared shortly after Beth's interview.
Vandelay | April 28, 13:05 CET
Also, anyone else see it in IMAX? I found the 3D better without it, and probably enjoyed it more without it too on my second watch.
Dude Meister | April 28, 13:09 CET
And although it was a post conversion project, the 3D did look good.
[ edited by Numfar PTB on 2012-04-28 14:14 ]
Numfar PTB | April 28, 14:13 CET
Liannon | April 28, 14:26 CET
Elsewhere on the Interwebs, I've seen a few people saying that the movie is underwritten or that it looks like Transformers. I really have no idea what to say to these people; in fact, I think the best course of action is to say nothing at all.
UnpluggedCrazy | April 28, 14:59 CET
The trailers and clips were well done in terms of mixing together quotations and scenes (lines such as Fury's "We are hopelessly, hilariously, outgunned" are expanded from the main trailer and have a completely different context).
I suspected that Coulson was in trouble as soon as reference was made to the agent having a girlfriend.
As Bluey (in the first thread) noted, there is an explanation for Jane Foster's absence (and it was nice that there was at least a nod to her and to Peggy Carter), but it seemed odd that there was no reference to her when Thor departed at the end.
At the end of Thor (and in the recent prelude comics), it seemed that Loki was controlling/impersonating Selvig prior to his arrival, but this didn’t seem apparent when Loki returned to Earth.
While all the actors delivered, I felt that Scarlett Johansson turned in the most interesting performance. Not only was there her enounter with Loki but her expressions showed the Black Widow to be in real peril when threatened with being pushed down a shaft when we first met her or when trapped with the Hulk.
To me the film lacked a signature theme (indeed, some of the music when the heroes are together sounded a bit like the Fellowship's theme from The Lord of the Rings).
Night On My Side | April 28, 21:58 CET
[ edited by Night On My Side on 2012-04-28 22:06 ]
Night On My Side | April 28, 21:59 CET
daylight | April 28, 22:22 CET
UnpluggedCrazy | April 28, 22:37 CET
gossi | April 28, 23:20 CET
UnpluggedCrazy | April 28, 23:33 CET
Jaymii | April 29, 00:26 CET
Alex_Jamieson | April 29, 00:49 CET
Numfar PTB | April 29, 00:58 CET
danielgm86 | April 29, 02:30 CET
Man I loved this movie, and I think I'll watch it again.
abitca | April 29, 04:10 CET
I'm so looking forward to the DVD, so I could pause and rewind, not to mention the extra footage! Plus, a few lines were drowned by the audience laughter.
Effulgent | April 29, 07:33 CET
mjwilson | April 29, 09:05 CET
UnpluggedCrazy | April 29, 09:49 CET
Here's a guy who was just in the thick of World War II a few weeks ago. He wakes up, is told the war is over, and that his country won. He understands that on an intellectual level, but he can't make sense of it on an emotional one. That's why (well, along with a million other little frustrations) he's so confused, upset, and isolated at the film's start. That he beats back the Chitauri as part of the Avengers finally gives him a sense of closure. They won.
UnpluggedCrazy | April 29, 11:02 CET
I'm sure this will do well and will probably be a great success but it didn't feel like a Joss movie to me.
Congratulations to Joss for the box office figures and generally favourable reviews - just didn't do it for me.
I feel oddly deflated.
catalyst2 | April 29, 12:41 CET
Nothing wrong with that of course, the movie was a lot of fun!
insistondoubt | April 29, 12:59 CET
UnpluggedCrazy | April 29, 13:02 CET
As far as I have seen, Marvel films will never be anything but unashamedly pro-US larger-than-life about stuff getting blown up and men and (always to a lesser extent) women with big muscles saving the day with little or no recourse to the consequences of said saving.
I think many of these things are fine, but I don't think they are particularly Joss.
[ edited by insistondoubt on 2012-04-29 14:09 ]
insistondoubt | April 29, 13:53 CET
I don't agree that there are little to no consequences, either; again, in the Iron Man films, the point is brought up that in giving up weapons-making, Tony turned himself into a weapon (granted, the sequel totally missed the mark in exploring that question, but I chalk that up to that film's generally sloppy writing). At the end of The Avengers, in between citizens proclaiming adoration of the group, you also hear the voices of those who are concerned or feel threatened by them.
Unfortunately, you're right about the diminished role of women in the films, which is something that's plagued superhero comics as a whole for their entire history. I do think that Black Widow was great, though.
UnpluggedCrazy | April 29, 14:18 CET
I think I'm just not really a fan of comic book films as a rule. That being said, I think The Avengers is by far and away the best Marvel flick I have seen.
insistondoubt | April 29, 15:49 CET
With Loki's questioning the importance of freedom to a happy society during the first 1/3rd of the film, I was expecting there to be questioning of how free a world with the Avengers and SHIELD would be. There were elements of it, such as the creation weapons with the Tesseract and Fury lying to coerce them into fighting for them, but this element felt to move towards the background the more the film went on. I was also expecting there to be more of an acknowledgement of the problems with what Captain America represents. This is very notably absent from the Stuttgart scene, which also felt very heavy handed in its allusions, despite a good build up.
But, and it is a massive but, this is a Summer blockbuster film. The fact that these are even touched upon is a massive improvement over the rest of its ilk and is something that Marvel films are actually generally pretty good at (see Iron Man and parts of Captain America.)
Joss's ideology was definitely present, even if it was a little muted. I would also say many of those things are probably best held off until a sequel, now the world is established..
Vandelay | April 29, 15:50 CET
daylight | April 29, 21:00 CET
I didn't have any problem not having been introduced further to the Chitauri. The scene was enough to tell me exactly what their place in the movie was, and set up the rest of the plot.
To me, the scene where the S.H.I.E.L.D complex is collapsing was SO reminiscent of the Buffy finale, I did a little happy dance in my seat, turned to whisper something about it to my daughter, then remembered she hasn't seen it yet-she's on season 3.
I loved it so much, I could go on and on.
I now have a dilemma though, I only have enough money to go and see one more film. I was going to go to see Cabin again, but now I want to see this!
My first post! :D
VicTopher | April 29, 21:05 CET
HULK not being able to pick up Thor's Hammer. (Take that Jeph Loeb.)
Black Widow being on top of Hawkeye before he realised she was there. Yes! She is a Super Spy. Plus, her not trusting him to be free of the influence of Loki, and knocking him out completely.
Steve Rogers' paid bet to Fury being in old money. Hah! Also the fact that he solved the Phase Two mystery quicker than Banner and Stark because, quite frankly, sometimes the old fashioned way just gets things done.
I loved the realisation from Tony that, of course, Loki would want Stark tower as his base. Where else would someone with such a huge ego position themselves?
Rescuing civilians was a priority.
Loki catching the arrow. Yeah, have it!
And Black Widow's response to Iron Man bringing the party to them.
I know there was other stuff I appreciated because it fulfilled my geeky comic book side. Little references and catches. All I know is I have to see this movie again on the big screen. Have to. Must. Will.
viewingfigures | April 29, 22:53 CET
- Ruffalo is amazing as Bruce Banner, as Joss proves that it Banner and Hulk duality can work. Also, anyone else thought that he got the Xander/Topher/Wash-ish lines of this movie.
- It's impressive what Joss did with Black Widow in the movie. Although It's really hard not agree that women really get short-handed (as they've been in most of the movies). Maria Hill barely gets anything to do, but she did get a few scenes showing how badass she can be as Fury's right-hand woman, as I commented if Colson is not dead, I hope they don't bring him back immediately, and we can see her get some spotlight, as a possible new character to tie-up the following movies (Iron Man 3, Captain America 2, Thor 2 - I wonder if Doctor Strange and Ant Man will be included in this sequence). But even with very little screen time, Pepper Potts does prove how important she is, and she doesn't even play a "hero". But back to Black Widow, I don't think that that action scene most outlets been using to promote how strong she is, is her highlight in the movie. I love how in the confrontation with Loki, as he tries to use every aspect of her being a woman to demean and insult her, she is the one actually conning him. Yes, she didn't leave unscathed from that, but that was the push she needed. And one can forget she doesn't have super powers in the end, as she leaped to the aircraft, and maneuvered it so she could return to the Stark Tower, and be pivotal to the closing of the portal. I remember being bummed they wouldn't be introducing another female heroine to the line-up, but now I'm somewhat glad Joss only kept her, as he was able to show her as being on par with the guys, and highlight sometimes even stronger. It unfortunate and sad, but a reality that women had to do more, so they can prove themselves as equal as men in certain situations, and although the movie doesn't really anything to disprove the point, it does reinforce that it is a reality.
Numfar PTB | April 29, 23:34 CET
So, I'll just note twenty things I particularly liked, in no particular order. NOTE: This is not a "Top Twenty" list of things, either.
1. Tom Hiddleston's evil Loki grin.
2. Black Widow's genuine fear when trapped in a tin can with the Hulk.
3. Captain America honouring his bet with Fury.
4. Thor's "He's adopted" line.
5. Thor and Iron Man's fight - especially in the context of Loki's "I'm listening" line.
6. Fury's early comment about the potential harm gamma rays can cause.
7. Thor's line about humans being petty "and tiny".
8. The scene with Banner and Harry Dean Stanton's character - "Son, you've got a
condition.
9. Black Widow putting Agent Coulson on hold.
10. Coulson's listening to the hold music.
11. Stark's "threatening" of Loki, and the staff-to-chest epic fail.
12. The impossible-not-to-include Hulk demolition of Loki.
13. The also impossible-not-to-include - Hulk's punch to Thor.
14. The equally great slow-motion Hammer wallop that Thor gave to Hulk!
15. Thor's entrance in the film, and Loki's unease.
16. Banner's decision to become Hulk.
17. Hulk's reviving "roar" for Iron Man, and Stark's subsequent reaction.
18. Rogers' delight at getting the 'monkey' reference.
19. The rage that RDJ brings to Stark's reaction following the death of Phil Coulson.
20. Thanos.
If for any film you can name twenty things you like without even trying, it's a damn fine film.
EffulGentleman | April 30, 02:28 CET
daylight | April 30, 09:33 CET
viewingfigures | April 30, 10:54 CET
I went with a friend who's a massive comics fan, and who'd said beforehand that she was apprehensive about Joss's handling of this movie she's waited for all this time.
But by the time we went on Sunday, she'd already seen it twice since it opened on Wednesday. The fact she was willing to go back a third time says a hell of a lot!
Also, I have a question for people who've seen it in both 2D and 3D: how would you compare them?
I went to a 2D screening, because 3D sometimes gives me a headache (and often seems pointless). But I'd be willing to try the 3D version when I inevitably see it again, if the consensus is that it's worth the extra money...
mermaidnz | April 30, 11:28 CET
*other quality 3d glasses are available
Jack Diamond | April 30, 12:02 CET
skittledog | May 01, 21:13 CET
Will Joss write/direct another Marvel movie? I think it's unlikely. I suspect the lack of full authorial control drove him nuts (yeah - all the way to the bank :). I don't think that situation will improve - there's an interesting Forbes article here which discusses the Marvel marketing division and their general plans for the various franchises. It's a depressing glimpse into the machine; a world away from Belwether.
malcolm | May 02, 07:20 CET
Joss has signed an option for the next two(?) Avengers films. If Marvel wants him, they've got him.
Kaan | May 02, 16:43 CET
Wonder if Disney will issue updated prints for the International markets, so we can also see this additional scene.
Bleeding Cool sums it up:
It’s hard to discuss the scene without taking all of the air out of it. I’d suggest you wait and see it in context. Suffice to say, it’s a neat idea and contrary to expectation that it might be used to set up an upcoming Marvel movie – Ant Man, say, or Iron Man 3 – it actually serves to pay off something from earlier in The Avengers.
And they link to sources that discuss and even show a screenshot for this additional scene, that will appear at the very end of the credits.
Numfar PTB | May 02, 16:44 CET
Got to go with effulGentleman's '20 things' there too, pretty much what I would put on my list.
The Do That Girl | May 02, 17:22 CET
Wait a minute... does that mean we did deserve it or didn't?
(It's the movie Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs?)
dispatch | May 03, 05:21 CET
Do you have a link to that news, as it is pretty major? I assume that deal was done when he originally signed onto the project, but I'm fairly certain I have heard him say recently that he is much more drawn to smaller scale productions and doesn't have a lot of interest in becoming known for making big budget blockbusters.
Vandelay | May 03, 19:59 CET
DreamRose311 | May 04, 15:43 CET